Worldwide Israel Sanctions Until Palestine Achieves Independence.

 

Posted on October 23, 2014

by Jerry Alatalo

ocean222United Nations Security Council President for the month of October is Argentina’s representative to the UN, and on October 21 an extremely important open debate on the Middle East and Palestine was held lasting 7 hours 30 minutes. Around 60 men and women UN representatives from around the world took turns speaking. Without exception, but for Israel’s UN ambassador, every speaker called for an independent, sovereign State of Palestine (two-state solution) after the 51-day, latest Israeli aggression against Gaza killing 2,180, injuring over 10,000, destroying 20,000 homes, commercial buildings, schools, hospitals, as well as destroying Gaza’s major infrastructure. Over 100,000 Gazans are now homeless because of Israel’s military aggression.

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon, after traveling to Gaza recently, described the destruction as “beyond comprehension”. The over-7 hour meeting saw each speaker, as well as calling for an independent State of Palestine, pointing out the need for Israel to immediately end its confiscation of occupied territory and construction of settlements. Many speakers made the point that the United Nations has discussed the issue of Israel-Palestine again and again and again through the decades without realizing a long-lasting peaceful solution but – as the woman ambassador from Belize said, “this (Israel’s 50-day bombing campaign) is the last straw of the last straws” – the clearly unanimous consensus during the meeting is that the time for empty words without results is over.

Listening closely to the words coming from Israel’s UN representative during his turn to speak – then again after everyone spoke and Argentine’s President of the Security Council asked if there were additional comments – was very odd in that he failed to discuss seriously (not at all, really) any of the very significant points made by what seemed like 59 out of 60 meeting attendees. The total unwillingness of the Israeli UN representative to acknowledge any detail out of the entirety of the meeting’s clear, unambiguous message from men and women there could be described as irrational because of the extreme difference of opinion between an in-agreement 59 compared to one.

Many of the speakers used the word “intransigence” in describing the Israeli government’s uncompromising stance regarding Palestinian independence. They are precisely correct, and for that reason the only way Israel will compromise and agree to Palestinian statehood is a worldwide sanctions movement on Israel, based on the economic sanctions model currently applied against Iran, Russia and other nations around the world. Every nation on Earth, including the United States of America, must completely halt all economic, financial and military dealings with the State of Israel until Palestine has become an independent nation. Signed, sealed, and delivered.

Israel will not alter its law-breaking actions and cooperate with the international community to allow Palestinians their own sovereign nation without the necessary, powerful incentive of a sanctions process carried out by the world’s nations. It has become painfully clear Palestinian statehood is inevitable. That reality needs to occur as soon as humanly possible, because the Israel-Palestine conflict represents war and peace in the Middle East region depending on when Palestinian statehood is irreversibly achieved.

—-

In the following CCTV interview a former Israeli ambassador to Mauritania, now journalist in Israel, Boaz Bismuth becomes asked for his thoughts on recent actions by the nations of Sweden and Britain to recognize the State of Palestine. His responses, very similar to Israel’s ambassador to the UN during yesterday’s meeting, fail in addressing the concerns of an increasingly aware and rapidly growing majority of the world’s people and government officials, and, because their Israeli narrative could be compared to an encapsulated summary of over six decades of irresolution of the conflict. At the end of Israel’s UN ambassador’s words in front of the Security Council yesterday, after Boaz Bismuth’s interview here on CCTV, and after over 60 years of Israeli “intransigence” and consistent violations of international law – Israeli words and actions have contributed nothing to solving the conflict with Palestine: creation of a Palestinian state.

(Boaz Bismuth / Thank you to CCTV America at YouTube)

Compare what Boaz Bismuth said to an excerpt on Israel-Palestine from the address by Luxembourg’s UN representative, which she delivered yesterday to the Security Council.

“I’d like to thank the Secretary General for his presentation as well as the permanent representative of the State of Palestine and the permanent representative of the State of Israel for their interventions. Luxembourg fully associates itself with the statement that will be made by the European Union. Madame Chairman, the Secretary General has just presented the appalling outcome of the 50 days of war on the Gaza Strip; the third such war in 6 years that has caused so many deaths and wounded people; that has destroyed so many lives and entire neighborhoods”.

“We’d like to thank Egypt, its efforts have led to a ceasefire concluded on August 26. It was the first step that was essential to put an end to the hostilities, suffering and humiliations. We also welcome the conference on Palestine restructuring of Gaza that was held in Cairo on the 12th of October, organized by Egypt and Norway in the support of the Palestinian Authority. Our Minister of Foreign and European Affairs was there and he reiterated the strong solidarity of Luxembourg with the Palestinian people that translates into a lasting financial commitment of approximately 7 million Euros a year”.

“We also welcome a mechanism established between the United Nations and the Palestinian Authority and Israel, which is also an essential step in the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip, but we know that we need to go further. No people would be able to live under the conditions imposed on the inhabitants of Gaza, besieged between three walls on one side and the sea, and that survive only thanks to UN and international aid. We need to lift the blockade that is strangling Gaza and its economy”.

“Madame President, the war on Gaza confirms that fighting is inevitable in a context of political stalemate, hatred and discord. Over the past 20 years, the peace process has gone through repetition of three successive phases: relaunch, bogging down and failure. Each new cycle has provided its share of suffering. Its time now to step off the beaten path. The time is no longer to repeat the same sterile processes of perpetual negotiations that don’t lead to anything. Our duty is to draw the lessons from the past. The components of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East have been set forth many times; we all know the terms of the equation, there’s no need to repeat them”.

“The goal is quite clear: an independent, democratic, contiguous Palestinian State, living in peace and security next to Israel on the basis of 1967 borders with Jerusalem as the capital of two states. The time has come to take bold and concrete measures to implement the two-state solution, before others take further measures that will make this solution impossible. In this context, Luxembourg condemns the recent decision by the Israeli authorities to approve the construction plans for 2,600 housing units. This decision is a direct threat to the two-state solution and the need for Jerusalem to be the capital for the two states Israel and Palestine”.

“If this decision is maintained, it would confirm our doubt about the commitment of Israel towards a negotiated settlement with the Palestinians. Luxembourg would like to recall here that settlements are illegal with regard to international law. We call on Israel to reconsider its decision, and more broadly, to put an end immediately to settlement activity in East Jerusalem and the whole of the West bank. Just as the European Union, Luxembourg will not recognize any changes to the 1967 borders except those agreed by both parties”.

“We hope that the Security Council is able to play its constructive role in order to achieve peace, to encourage and facilitate efforts aimed at saving the two-state solution and putting an end to occupation. My country is ready to support those efforts”.

Luxembourg’s woman ambassador to the UN expressed views virtually identical to all men and women who spoke at the October 21 Security Council meeting on the Middle East, which can be heard and viewed at the United Nations website, UN.org.  Sweden and Britain have taken actions heard round the world when they recognized the State of Palestine. Boaz Bismuth replied to his CCTV interviewer about Sweden and Britain’s actions: “I would say it is, I would say, that it is a spectacular display of ignorance”.

When the CCTV interviewer suggested that Israel was facing increased world isolation, Mr. Bismuth responded, “Should Israel commit suicide now because of world public opinion?” He told the CCTV interviewer that Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas’ address to the 69th United Nations General Assembly calling for Palestinian statehood was “vicious, violent lies”, Israel is just a small nation, and finally “This is ridiculous, it is ridiculous”.

Every nation on Earth must place overwhelmingly powerful economic and military sanctions on the State of Israel with the stated purpose of bringing into reality a Palestinian State. Israel’s stubborn, uncompromising, criminal actions are not only irrational but, with its possession of hundreds of nuclear weapons, extremely dangerous.

The world cannot risk waiting for Israel to come to its senses and conform to the wishes of an increasingly growing, “not buying it anymore”, impatient world. An international sanctions regime placed on Israel represents the action closest to a guarantee that Israel will capitulate to internationally agreed upon reason and rationality, and may offer the one and only chance of peace for men, women and children living in the Middle East region of Earth.

—-

(Part 1 of 3 / The 7,281st meeting of the United Nations Security Council) 

http://webtv.un.org/watch/part-1-middle-east-including-the-palestinian-question-security-council-7281st-meeting/3851389937001

The Spiritual Dimension: Toward A Progressive Unifying Vision.

Posted on October 21, 2014

by Jerry Alatalo

aaa-9Rabbi Michael Lerner, Sister Joan Chittister and Dr. Cornel West co-founded the Network of Spiritual Progressives. Michael Lerner likes to point out that Dr. Martin Luther King didn’t say “I have a… complaint” but “I have a dream”. The main message he gives to audiences across the United States and around the world is that liberal/progressive movements have excluded the spiritual dimension in their articulations, and that – because almost every human being desires a world with more love, kindness, caring, and generosity – simply because of that exclusion a better world has been severely slowed in manifesting into reality.

The Network of Spiritual Progressives (NSP) share the perspective that there are two views of the world. One is a view that has been widespread in most of human society for thousands of years and says everyone is looking out for themselves, maximizing advantages and control so others won’t dominate and take advantage of them, all the while creating fear, distrust, and psychological, physical stress and violence ranging from personal differences to domestic/family disputes to wars between nations.

The other view, which Michael Lerner believes progressives unfortunately dismiss as impractical, has also been around for millennia, and that is a world of love, caring, kindness and generosity. This worldview forms the basis of all the world’s major religions, included in the sacred writings of Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Chinese folk religion, Shintoism, Sikhism, Judaism, Jainism, Baha’i, and others. Most people shift back and forth between the many times simultaneously held views in their daily lives and realities, and members of the NSP advocate for a tremendous strengthening of love, kindness, caring and generosity views in public debate, discussion, and other forms of conveying ideas and proposals.

If humanity were able to vote on it, most have reached the point where a new world fueled by more love, caring and generosity is something that would greatly help in solving what Michael Lerner calls the “spiritual crisis” created in large measure by absorption of competitiveness, maximization of profits, selfishness and materialism in today’s global society. In what Mr. Lerner and fellow members of NSP see as a great paradox, what most people want – a new and better world – is not coming into existence simply because people hold the belief that it’s not possible.

He gives the example of low-income people voting for right-wing politicians against their own interests to point out how progressives’ inclusion of the spiritual dimension in their writings, talks, and other forms of communication has become a serious matter for consideration. Widespread perceiving from the materialist, competitive view of the world has led many people/voters to – because of the shortage of spirituality in offered progressive political philosophy – lean on right-wing churches as their perceived only option for answering psycho-spiritual needs, although by doing so their votes end up going to candidates who act against their interests after winning the election.

According to spiritual progressives, change activists must acknowledge a failure to articulate a broader vision of the world which everyone wants: a different world conveyed which will startle and move people because they’ve never heard progressives talk from such a viewpoint. Michael Lerner is aware that responses to the ideas of spiritual progressives typically include “materialism and selfishness is everyone’s lifestyle” so what groups like NSP recommend is “unrealistic”. Michael Lerner’s suggestion to audiences is “do not be realistic”, throw out all perceptions that the way things are is all that’s possible, and always go for the highest vision of the greatest good, whatever your issue(s).

—-

Michael Lerner is the editor of Tikkun Magazine (the spiritual left), with articles written by spiritually progressive men and women from all religious traditions. The following video is of Rabbi Michael Lerner giving a fascinating talk in Ashland, Oregon in September 2014 after accepting an invitation from Peace House.

Does participating in spiritual progressivism offer humanity a magnificent opportunity to create positive change – the new and better world every man, woman and child wants to experience?

For more information please visit: http://www.tikkun.org

—-

(Thank you to Peace House at YouTube)

PressTV Reporter Serena Shim Dies In Suspicious Turkey Crash.

Posted on October 19, 2014

by Jerry Alatalo

“Hold for yourself the belief that each day that dawns is your last.”

- HORACE (65-8 B.C.) Roman poet

earthblog3Serena Shim died in a suspicious auto accident in Turkey, where she was covering events for PressTV and the warring between Kurds and ISIS in the Syrian city of Kobane. If any man or woman reading this has contacts with journalists in that region of Turkey near the border with Syria, or contacts who can travel to the area where Serena Shim died, please consider urging those contacts to travel there as soon as possible and investigate her tragic death.

Independent media reporting crews which have the means to travel to Turkey to investigate Serena Shim’s death are strongly encouraged to do so as soon as possible. In memory of Serena Shim, all efforts must become undertaken so that an army of independent journalists gets to that place in Turkey with a determined and focused mission of uncovering the truth.

For those who have no contacts in that region of the world and so are unable to talk with anyone about investigating Serena Shim’s death, write her name down and place it on your wall as a reminder to stay on top of developments. In all likelihood a courageous woman journalist dedicated to reporting the truth became the victim of political assassination.

For those in the United States and Europe, pay close attention in the upcoming days to how, or if, western mainstream corporate media covers the tragic death of Serena Shim. Follow reports on investigations into her death and write articles on developments until the truth of what really happened becomes known.

Independent media, citizen journalists and peace activists around the world must unify now in a powerful effort directed toward finding and telling the truth of what happened in Serena Shim’s death – a mother of two and journalist dedicated to revealing the truth.

****

(Thank you to PressTV News Videos at YouTube)

Donetsk: October 8, 2014

—-

On Turkish spy accusation: October 18, 2014

—-

Serena Shim’s last report: October 18, 2014

—-

(Thank you to iStateOfMind at Youtube)

PressTV panel on Serena Shim’s death: October 19, 2014

German Whistleblower/Journalist: “Always People Behind Push For War.”

Posted on October 18, 2014

by Jerry Alatalo

Book11German journalist and editor Udo Ulfkotte says he was forced to publish the words of intelligence agents under his own name. His insider story ranks up there with author of “Confession of an Economic Hitman” John Perkins, central character – the late journalist Gary Webb – of the just-released movie “Kill The Messenger”, Edward Snowden and Glen Greenwald, Julian Assange and Chelsea Manning, along with a group of Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) whistleblowers starting with John Stockwell (at the time, the highest ranking CIA official to blow the whistle) in the 1970’s.

Combining “Kill The Messenger” and its focus on mainstream media’s intentional efforts to falsely discredit and tarnish Gary Webb’s reputation and silence his reporting/story of CIA drug connections during the Iran-Contra era, increasing numbers of examples of corporate media getting caught publishing false information, and now 25-year veteran German journalist Udo Ulfkotte’s revelations, furthers the deteriorating image of the mainstream/corporate media in the minds of men and women around the world.

It will be interesting to see if Germany’s parliament will become the focus of increasing pressure from the German/European people to hold hearings on what Mr. Ulfkotte wrote in his book. Perhaps much stiffer laws/penalties are forthcoming in Germany and around the world which punish news organizations for intentional publication of articles/information managers, editors, and journalists know is false. Probably so, and that is a media state-of-affairs which is long overdue. It seems almost certain the trend toward more and more insiders of powerful corporate, mainstream media coming forward with new revelations on their experience of propagandist, manipulative efforts will only intensify.

Interesting as well will be testimonies from both the owners of large media corporations, top managers and editors before government hearings in Germany and other countries as this scandal becomes more widely known. It is uncertain whether Udo Ulfkotte has ever read Ben H. Bagdikian’s classic 1983 book “The Media Monopoly”, but one can bet he agrees with what Mr. Bagdikian wrote:

“Each generation has to establish its own priorities and reinvigorate the best principles of the society. This generation is no different. By raising small, minority voices today, this generation, like the Jeffersonians 180 (now 210) years ago, can produce a change that will strengthen American democracy and validate the principle of a truly informed consent as the basis of a free society”.

“The media provide unintegrated fragments of this arrogance without the coherence that brings understanding. The major media speak with clarity and persistence about the sins of the powerless, but they do not speak with clarity and persistence about the sins of private power”.

“…If this generation of Americans exercises its responsibilities to political morality, it will be following the dictates of eighty years ago (now one hundred ten years ago) by that remarkable physician-philosopher William James: ‘The deadliest of enemies of nations….always dwell within their borders. And from these internal enemies civilization is always in need of being saved. The nation blest above all is she in whom the civic genius of the people does the saving day by day, by acts without external picturesqueness; by speaking, writing, voting reasonably; by smiting corruption swiftly; by good temper between parties; by the people knowing true men when they see them, and preferring them as leaders to rabid partisans or empty quacks’.”

—-

Transcript: Udo Ulfkotte interview

“Well, I’ve been a journalist for about 25 years, and I was educated to lie, to betray, and not to tell the truth to the public, but seeing right now within the last few months, how the German and the American media tries to bring war to the people in Europe; to bring war to Russia. This is a point of no return, and I’m going to stand up and say it is not right what I have done in the past. To manipulate people, to make propaganda against Russia; and it’s not right what my colleagues do and have done in the past. Because they are bribed to betray the people not only in Germany but all over Europe”.

“The reason for writing this book was that I’m very fearful of a new war in Europe and I don’t like to have this situation again. Because war is never coming from itself; there is always people behind the push for war. And this is not only politicians, this is journalists too. And I just have written in the book how we have betrayed in the past our readers to push for war, and, because I don’t want this anymore; I’m fed up with this propaganda. We live in a banana republic and not in a democratic country where we have press freedom; where we have human rights”.

“When we… if you see the German media especially, my colleagues, who day by day write against the Russians who are in transatlantic organizations and who are supported by the United States to do so. People like me, I became honorary citizen of the state of Oklahoma in the US, just why? Just because I write pro-American; I wrote pro-American. I was supported by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Why? Because I should be pro-American. I’m fed up with it. I don’t want to do it anymore”.

“And so I’ve just written a book, not to earn money, no, it will cause a lot of trouble for me; just to give the people in this country Germany and Europe and all over the world, just to give them a glimpse of a view of what goes on behind closed doors. There is many examples for that. If we just go back to history, if you go into the year 1988. If you go to your archives you will find that in March 1988 there was in Iraq the Kurdish people had been gassed by poisoned gas. That is known all over the world. But, in July 1988, they sent me to the Iran-Iraq border, it was war between the Iranians and Iraqis, and I was sent there to photograph how the Iranians had been gassed with poison gas – with German poison gas”.

“Mustard gas – made by Germany. And I was there to make photographs how these people had been killed by poison gas from Germany. When I came back to Germany, there was just one small photo in a (Frankfurt) newspaper, and there was one small article – not writing how brutally, how unhuman, how terrible it was to kill decades after the 2nd World War people with German poison gas. So, this was a situation I feel misused for having been there just to give a documentary what has been done, but not being allowed to cry out to the world what we have done behind closed doors. Up until today it’s not well known in the public, that was German public – us, there had been hundreds, thousands of people gassed in this city”.

“Now you ask what have I done for intelligence agencies. So, please see most of the journalists you see in foreign countries, they claim to be journalists, and they might be journalists – European or American journalists. But, many of them, like me in the past, are so-called “nonofficial cover”, that’s what the Americans call that. I have been a “nonofficial cover”. Nonofficial cover means what? You too work for an intelligence agency; you help them if they want you to help them, but they will never, never… When you are locked, when they find out you are not only a journalist but a spy too, they will never say, “this is one of our guys”. They will not know you. That means “unofficial cover”. So, I have helped them in several situations and I feel ashamed for that too”.

“Now, like I feel ashamed that I’ve worked for very recommended newspaper, because I was bribed by billionaires, I was bribed by the Americans, not to report exactly the truth. I just imagined in my car while I was driving to this interview, I just tried to work out in my brain what would have happened if I would have written a pro-Russian article in the Frankfurter (newspaper). Well, I don’t know what would have happened. But we were all educated to write pro-European, pro-American, but “please, not pro-Russian”. So I’m very sorry for that, but this is not what I understand for democracy and for press freedom. I’m very sorry for that”.

“Well, Germany is still kind of a colony of the United States; you see that at many points. Like the majority of Germans don’t want to have nukes in our country, but we still have American nukes. We are still a kind of a colony of the Americans, and being a colony it is very easy to approach young journalists through – what is very important here – is transatlantic organizations. All journalists from really respected and recommended big German newspapers, magazines, radio stations, TV stations…they are all members or guests of the big transatlantic organizations. In those transatlantic organizations, you are approached to be pro-American and there is nobody coming to you and saying “we are the Central Intelligence Agency, would you like to work for us” No. This is not the case how it happens”.

“What they do, those transatlantic organizations, is they invite you, they invite you for seeing the United States. They pay for that, they pay all your expenses and everything. So you’re bribed, you get more and more corrupt, because they make you good contacts. You won’t know that those good contacts are, let’s say, “nonofficial” covers or officially people working for CIA or other American agencies. But you make friends, you think they are friends, and you cooperate with them. They ask you, “well, could you do me this favor, could you do me that favor?”, and so your brain is more and more brainwashed through these guys”.

“Your question was is this only the case for German journalists. No, I think it is especially the case with British journalists, because they have a much closer relationship. It is especially the case with Israelis; of course with French journalists – for a part, not that big as with German or British journalists. It is the case for Australian journalists, for journalists from New Zealand, from Taiwan, from, well, there is many countries. Countries that, the Arab world, Jordan for example. Like Oman, the Sultanate of Oman. There is many countries where this happens, where you find people to claim they are respected journalists but if you look behind them you will find they are puppets on a string of the Central Intelligence Agency”.

“I’m sorry for interrupting you. To give you one example, sometimes the intelligence agencies they come to your office and they want you to write an article. I’ll give you an example, not from other journalists but from me myself. I’ve forgotten the year, I just remember that the German foreign intelligence (BND), a sister organization of the CIA – it was founded by the CIA. So, one day the BND, the German foreign intelligence agency, came to my office in Frankfurt and they wanted me to write an article about Libya and about Colonel Moammar Gaddafi. I had absolutely no secret informations regarding Colonel Moammar Gaddafi and Libya”.

“But they gave me all these secret informations, and they wanted me to write, to sign the article with my name. I did that, but it was not an article that was published in the Frankfurt (newspaper) – that originally came from the German intelligence agency. So, do you really think that this is journalism? Intelligence agencies writing articles? Oh yes, that article I have reprinted it partly in my book. The article was “How Libya and Colonel Gaddafi Secretly Tried to Build a Poison Gas Factory”. It was a story that was printed worldwide two days later”.

“But I had no information on that. It was the intelligence agencies that wanted me to write that article. But this is not the way journalism should work – that intelligence agencies, that they decide what is printed and what is not”.

“If I say no? … I know what would happen if I did not cooperate with intelligence services. Well, I have had 6 times my house was house-searched because I was accused by the public prosecutor, the German public prosecutor, I was accused of leaking state secrets, leaking secrets of state. Six times house-searched. They hoped that I wouldn’t do that ever again”.

“But I think it’s worth that the truth will come out one day. The truth won’t die. And I don’t mind what will happen. I’ve had three heart attacks. I have no children. So, if they want to bring me to court or to prison, so it’s worth for the truth”. 

****

(RT at YouTube)