Did War Criminal Donald Trump Start The Covert COVID-19 Fire?

By Jerry Alatalo

Why does Donald Trump find it impossible to say “Fort Detrick”?

erhaps some inspiration is needed as a first step to deal with this most uncomfortable matter. We’ll take it at this moment from popular musical artist Billy Joel, whose smash hit “We Didn’t Start the Fire” unknowingly sums up the unprecedented, current COVID-19 “natural versus covert biological warfare” global predicament.

(Thank you to Billy Joel at YouTube. Maximum volume recommended.)

There is an absolutely huge (and growing) controversy surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. The controversy – which nobody in the Washington, D.C. establishment nor western corporate media is talking about – is precisely the question as to whether COVID-19 is a naturally-occurring virus or a laboratory made so-called “gain-of-function” creation, or in other words, designed by scientists as a biological weapon.

What is extremely disturbing is the fact that nobody in the Trump administration, the United States Congress, nor the corporate media are talking about the July 2019 closure by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control of the 1,000,000 square foot bio-defense laboratory, for safety concerns, at Fort Detrick, Maryland in July 2019. The proverbial $64,000 has become: Why does it seem impossible for any of these establishment figures to say the word “Fort”, immediately followed by the word “Detrick”?

Let’s say the shutdown was due to an accidental release of a deadly virus. At that point, if the leaders in America were straight shooters and loyal to truth, there would have been an immediate notification conveyed to the American people, with honest and strict instructions for limiting and preventing the out-of-control spread of the bio-weapon’s deadly health consequences. Given the mysterious (total) silence coming from the Washington power center institutions regarding the Fort Detrick shutdown, what can observant people conclude but that the COVID-19 originated in Maryland, U.S.A. in the summer of 2019?

It’s a fair question.

Let’s again assume COVID-19 was an accidental release from Fort Detrick. Is it possible the worst-feared event had occurred: a deadly “gain-of-function” virus had slipped out of containment and into the environment? What explains the odd spike in flu cases close to Fort Detrick in elderly care facilities around the time of Fort Detrick’s closure? What accounts for the “Mystery Vaping Illness”, which just so happens to display the precise same symptoms as COVID-19, and which began manifesting in the summer of 2019, after the shutdown of Fort Detrick?

These are, once again, completely rational and fair questions.

Speaking of pertinent questions … Is it possible the Trump administration decided against alerting the American people in the Maryland region of the virus’ escape from Fort Detrick, – but instead weighed and considered their options and decided on a cover-up, while opting to “hit” China, Iran, Italy and potentially elsewhere with covert bio-warfare in order to throw people off the tracks with respect to COVID-19’s true origin?

Again … most thoughtful people would perceive that as a clearly fair question.

Those stubborn pertinent questions raise their ugly head again when asking about the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee’s “behind closed doors, secret” meeting with COVID-19 czar Anthony Fauci, which eventually resulted in a (quickly buried and forgotten) scandal involving members of the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives (of BOTH parties) initiating stock market transactions based on their dismal COVID-19 inside information – at the same time traitorously keeping maximally important life-and-death information withheld from their employers: the American people.

How did this immense scandal so, so quickly vanish down the “memory hole”?

Perhaps such pertinent questions are perceived as a “nuisance” to some people, however: Where are the Congressional investigations to resolve the obvious questions and significantly growing controversy surrounding the COVID-19 phenomenon – concerning whether it’s naturally-occurring or a man-made biological weapon? Some people are old enough and/or informed enough to have an awareness of the very serious U.S. Senate Church Committee Hearings in the 1970s on the C.I.A.’s nefarious and most-often criminal activities.

It seems clear beyond doubt another Washington, D.C. investigation based on the Church Committee Hearings model has become necessary to obtain the true facts on the monumentally consequential, unprecedented and historic COVID-19 global pandemic. The absence of an investigation is absolutely unacceptable.

Why?…

Because if COVID-19 was released on an unsuspecting and innocent humanity as part of a sophisticated covert biological warfare operation, then the criminals who are responsible must become identified and prosecuted to the fullest extent of existing law. If it becomes proven such is the case, our suggestion is hanging the covert war criminals by the throat until dead on a worldwide public live-streamed broadcast.

After all, COVID-19 is one of the mild (yet deadly) forms of biological weapon on the shelf, leaving any potential war criminals access to an even more deadly array of weapons to utilize in future strikes. This state of affairs must be taken on as a matter of utmost, immeasurable gravity and consequence.

Heaven help us all… One final summarizing word of advice: Investigate. Peace.

(Thank you to John Hankey at YouTube)

Prediction: “SEVEN” Wins The Oscar For Best Documentary.

By Jerry Alatalo

“Art as art, not art for art, must be life-enhancing.”

– BERNARD BERENSON (1865-1959) American art critic

(In the late afternoon hours of September 11, 2001) This image comes a split second after World Trade Center Building 7 started its completely symmetrical collapse, straight down into its own footprint.

hile the unbelievably intense global debate over whether the COVID-19 virus is naturally-occurring or a man-made weapon used for covert biological warfare burns on intensely, in the background a powerful new documentary titled “SEVEN” has become created and is set for release.

“SEVEN” features the absolutely explosive results of an engineering study conducted at the University of Alaska-Fairbanks, led by engineering expert Professor Leroy Hulsey. In a major development with respect to events on September 11, 2001 – now known by everyone, except those simultaneously deaf, dumb and blind, as “9/11” – Professor Hulsey’s team concluded, in direct opposition to the government’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), that the World Trade Center’s Building 7 did not collapse dues to fires.

We are perhaps overly optimistic or looking at the world through rose-colored glasses or walking out on the proverbial limb in sharing the prediction “SEVEN” wins the Academy Award for Best Documentary. It doesn’t matter anymore for those of us who’ve endured seemingly endless frustration in the over (18) years of waiting for an obviously necessary re-examination of the (unarguably) most important event of the 21st century.

So we’re sticking to the prediction, come hell or high water: “SEVEN” will take the Oscar.

If we are fortunate enough in the near future, this cartoon won’t mirror the experiences of men and women headed out to theaters after becoming determined to watch the just-released powerful new documentary “SEVEN”.

“SEVEN” is a documentary about the extraordinary conclusions of the University of Alaska Fairbanks study on the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 and the epic failure of our institutions to tell the truth.

Here is the 2-minute Official Teaser:

(Thank you to Charles Ewing Smith at YouTube)