A Letter To Dr. Andrew Hill, And Humanity.

ost readers who pass this way will already be aware of the immense scandal regarding the highly-effective drug ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19, and most especially the bizarre, even criminal, suppression of its use on a large portion of the Earth’s landmass.

The newly-released short documentary film “A Letter to Dr. Andrew Hill” deals with the scandal in the most direct, powerful manner possible. The film and its central message must be seen and heard all across this Earth.

The most widely circulated theory for the puzzling and irrational, not to mention unprecedented, blocking of the drug – even to the extent of viciously slandering men and women doctors who strongly advocate for its use to defeat COVD-19, including revocation of their licenses to practice medicine – is that ivermectin represents an available alternative treatment, which legally nullifies the reason for allowing Emergency Use Authorization for the (now) proven deadly and dangerous (never before used on humans) mRNA injections.

Dr. Andrew Hill was initially a strong advocate of ivermectin for treating COVID-19, having joined with renowned Doctors Tess Lawrie, Paul Marik, Pierre Kory and many others around the Earth who’d discovered profound success with the very inexpensive and potent off-patent anti-viral drug – which was, incidentally, awarded a Nobel Prize.

Dr. Andrew Hill for some inexplicable reason(s) – and to the great disappointment of the previously named doctors sharing their extremely high anticipation of the World Health Association’s (WHO) immediate recommendation for the drug’s use – concluded in his scientific paper on ivermectin for the WHO that more, much larger trials were first necessary. In the process, unfortunately, the greatly troubling turnaround action had the effect of essentially aborting the urgent efforts to implement ivermectin worldwide.

When all ivermectin trials worldwide have shown the drug to be capable of reducing deaths by an estimated 70%, and when taking into consideration that doctors are still being viciously slandered for advocating and/or prescribing ivermectin to this day – a full one year later, the reader will understand the full magnitude of the scandal and why a criminal investigation is absolutely necessary.

Hundreds of thousands of men, women and children across the world have perished unnecessarily – from both being denied ivermectin and as the ultimate negative adverse side effect from receiving the mRNA injections. We do not hesitate in asserting, here and now, that what humanity is witnessing is a ruthless (ongoing) premeditated mass murder.

Please do what you must… Get this urgent information out to the entire world. Thank you.

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/a-letter-to-andrew-hill-dr-tess-lawrie-oracle-films_X4ZQwrke1kDafEu.html

So How Serious Is Ukraine’s Neo-Nazi Romance?

With her lengthy in-depth article, Cynthia Chung covers all the bases and the controversies surrounding the tragic situation concerning Ukraine and Russia, and with each passing day, increasingly, concerning the entire Earth….

UPROOTED PALESTINIANS: SALAM ALQUDS ALAYKUM

May 20, 2022

Source

By Cynthia Chung

In the history of civilization, Politics has more often than not, been a matter reduceable to the question of “whose side are you on?”

Granted it is not an easy affair to discern what most-nearly approaches truth in the fog of “the present.” Hindsight is 20/20 they say, although that is also not entirely true, for the interpretation of history is just another battlefield, albeit in much slower motion.

In a world of increased division, where we are told there is only black or white, the best we mere “civilians” can hope for is to not get hit by the crossfire. However, that is becoming increasingly harder to do.

It is not a matter of holding “opinion” any longer, it is about upholding a “conviction,” not earned with your own personal scrutiny and research, but by your “faith” in such a…

View original post 7,255 more words

Empire Of Hypocrisy.

The real relationship between The Commonwealth and its “family of nations and peoples” here becomes starkly clear.

When the City of London vampires look at men, women and children in Africa, Asia or elsewhere, they don’t see fellow human beings but “assets” with “potential”, “human capital” from which they hope to derive a highly lucrative “demographic dividend”.
….
….
….
….
….Anyone who dares to expose and challenge their sugar-coated sociopathy is likely to be denounced as a selfish, reactionary, right-wing conspiracy theorist.

After all, what decent citizen could possibly have a problem with an empire which is “a compelling force for good” working to “eradicate poverty”, to bring about “peace and harmony” and “a better world for our children”?

*

Fasten your seatbelts … tight.

winter oak

by Paul Cudenec

1. The nice imperialists
2. A global agenda
3. Human capital
4. Impact outcomes
5. Vast fortunes
6. Devoted to deceit

1. The nice imperialists

In the middle of the 19th century, the British Empire ran into what what would today be termed a “public relations crisis”.

Influential domestic voices were starting to criticise its industrial system and worldwide domination on ethical grounds, not least the art critic John Ruskin.

He wrote that all he had found at the heart of what was supposedly a great civilization was “insane religion, degraded art, merciless war, sullen toil, detestable pleasure, and vain or vile hope”. (1)

Lack of public support for the empire at home from the wave of “Little Englander” sentiment also risked affecting the way Britain’s activities were viewed abroad.

As Carroll Quigley writes, its success was partly due to “its ability to present itself to the world as the defender of…

View original post 7,240 more words