The 9/11 BIG LIE Dam Is Hemorrhaging.

(The Oneness of Humanity – Editor’s note: This article is cross-posted from Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Please share this monumentally important, powerful and explosive (pun absolutely INTENDED) expose’ to the furthest corners of planet Earth. Thank you.)

How 36 Reporters Brought Us the Twin Towers’ Explosive Demolition on 9/11

Ted Walter and Graeme MacQueen

July 8, 2020

Editor’s Note: As of the publication of this article, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is awaiting a decision from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) regarding the request for correction that AE911Truth and ten family members of 9/11 victims submitted to NIST on April 15, 2020. The request seeks corrections to eight separate items of information in NIST’s 2008 report on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, any of which would effectively force NIST to reverse its conclusion that fires caused the building’s destruction.

NIST informed AE911Truth on June 12, 2020, that it was unable to meet its goal of responding within 60 days. Under the procedure governing such requests, NIST must provide a decision within 120 days of the submission, which would fall on August 13, 2020. If NIST elects not to take the corrective action being sought, AE911Truth and its fellow requesters would then have 30 days to file an appeal with NIST. Should NIST fail in any way to comply with the procedure governing requests or should it fail to rectify the information quality violations documented in the request, AE911Truth and its fellow requesters are prepared to take legal action.

In the meantime, AE911Truth is taking one further step toward correcting the record on the destruction of the Twin Towers with the publication of this article. This exhaustive review of 70 hours of 9/11 news coverage reveals that the hypothesis of explosions bringing down the Twin Towers was not only prevalent among reporters covering the events in New York City on 9/11 but was, in fact, the dominant hypothesis.

The 36 reporters who brought us the Twin Towers’ explosive demolition on 9/11 include, by network, ABC’s George Stephanopoulos and Cynthia McFadden; CBS’s Harold Dow, Tom Flynn, Mika Brzezinski, and Carol Marin (appearing on WCBS); NBC’s Pat Dawson and Anne Thompson; CNN’s Aaron Brown, Rose Arce, Patty Sabga, and Alan Dodds Frank; Fox News’ David Lee Miller and Rick Leventhal; MSNBC’s Ashleigh Banfield and Rick Sanchez; CNBC’s John Bussey, Ron Insana, and Bob Pisani; WABC’s N.J. Burkett, Michelle Charlesworth, Nina Pineda, Cheryl Fiandaca, and Joe Torres; WCBS’s John Slattery, Marcella Palmer, Vince DeMentri, and Marcia Kramer; WNBC’s Walter Perez; New York 1’s Kristen Shaughnessy, Andrew Siff, John Schiumo, and Andrew Kirtzman; USA Today’s Jack Kelley; and two unidentified reporters (1 and 2) who attended a press conference with Mayor Giuliani and Governor Pataki. Video clips of each reporter’s statements on 9/11 can be viewed below.

The widely held belief that the Twin Towers collapsed as a result of the airplane impacts and the resulting fires is, unbeknownst to most people, a revisionist theory. Among individuals who witnessed the event firsthand, the more prevalent hypothesis was that the Twin Towers had been brought down by massive explosions.

This observation was first made 14 years ago in the article, “118 Witnesses: The Firefighters’ Testimony to Explosions in the Twin Towers.” A review of interviews conducted with 503 members of the New York Fire Department (FDNY) in the weeks and months after 9/11 revealed that 118 of them described witnessing what they interpreted that day to be explosions. Only 10 FDNY members were found describing the destruction in ways supportive of the fire-induced collapse hypothesis.

The interviews of fire marshal John Coyle and firefighter Christopher Fenyo explicitly support this finding. Coyle remarked in his interview, “I thought it was exploding, actually. That’s what I thought for hours afterwards. . . . Everybody I think at that point still thought these things were blown up.” Similarly, Fenyo recalled in his interview, “At that point, a debate began to rage [about whether to continue rescue operations in the other, still-standing tower] because the perception was that the building looked like it had been taken out with charges.”

News reporters constitute another group of individuals who witnessed the event firsthand and whose accounts were publicly documented. While many people have seen a smattering of news clips on the internet in which reporters describe explosions, there has never been, as far as we know, a systematic attempt to collect these news clips and analyze them.

We decided to take on this task for two reasons. First, we wanted to know just how prevalent the explosion hypothesis was among reporters. Second, anticipating that this would be the more prevalent hypothesis, we wanted to determine exactly how it was supplanted by the hypothesis of fire-induced collapse.

In this article, we present our findings related to the first question. In a subsequent article, we will examine how the hypothesis of fire-induced collapse so quickly supplanted the originally dominant explosion hypothesis.

Continue reading “The 9/11 BIG LIE Dam Is Hemorrhaging.”

Did War Criminal Donald Trump Start The Covert COVID-19 Fire?

By Jerry Alatalo

Why does Donald Trump find it impossible to say “Fort Detrick”?

erhaps some inspiration is needed as a first step to deal with this most uncomfortable matter. We’ll take it at this moment from popular musical artist Billy Joel, whose smash hit “We Didn’t Start the Fire” unknowingly sums up the unprecedented, current COVID-19 “natural versus covert biological warfare” global predicament.

(Thank you to Billy Joel at YouTube. Maximum volume recommended.)

There is an absolutely huge (and growing) controversy surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. The controversy – which nobody in the Washington, D.C. establishment nor western corporate media is talking about – is precisely the question as to whether COVID-19 is a naturally-occurring virus or a laboratory made so-called “gain-of-function” creation, or in other words, designed by scientists as a biological weapon.

What is extremely disturbing is the fact that nobody in the Trump administration, the United States Congress, nor the corporate media are talking about the July 2019 closure by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control of the 1,000,000 square foot bio-defense laboratory, for safety concerns, at Fort Detrick, Maryland in July 2019. The proverbial $64,000 has become: Why does it seem impossible for any of these establishment figures to say the word “Fort”, immediately followed by the word “Detrick”?

Let’s say the shutdown was due to an accidental release of a deadly virus. At that point, if the leaders in America were straight shooters and loyal to truth, there would have been an immediate notification conveyed to the American people, with honest and strict instructions for limiting and preventing the out-of-control spread of the bio-weapon’s deadly health consequences. Given the mysterious (total) silence coming from the Washington power center institutions regarding the Fort Detrick shutdown, what can observant people conclude but that the COVID-19 originated in Maryland, U.S.A. in the summer of 2019?

It’s a fair question.

Let’s again assume COVID-19 was an accidental release from Fort Detrick. Is it possible the worst-feared event had occurred: a deadly “gain-of-function” virus had slipped out of containment and into the environment? What explains the odd spike in flu cases close to Fort Detrick in elderly care facilities around the time of Fort Detrick’s closure? What accounts for the “Mystery Vaping Illness”, which just so happens to display the precise same symptoms as COVID-19, and which began manifesting in the summer of 2019, after the shutdown of Fort Detrick?

These are, once again, completely rational and fair questions.

Speaking of pertinent questions … Is it possible the Trump administration decided against alerting the American people in the Maryland region of the virus’ escape from Fort Detrick, – but instead weighed and considered their options and decided on a cover-up, while opting to “hit” China, Iran, Italy and potentially elsewhere with covert bio-warfare in order to throw people off the tracks with respect to COVID-19’s true origin?

Again … most thoughtful people would perceive that as a clearly fair question.

Those stubborn pertinent questions raise their ugly head again when asking about the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee’s “behind closed doors, secret” meeting with COVID-19 czar Anthony Fauci, which eventually resulted in a (quickly buried and forgotten) scandal involving members of the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives (of BOTH parties) initiating stock market transactions based on their dismal COVID-19 inside information – at the same time traitorously keeping maximally important life-and-death information withheld from their employers: the American people.

How did this immense scandal so, so quickly vanish down the “memory hole”?

Perhaps such pertinent questions are perceived as a “nuisance” to some people, however: Where are the Congressional investigations to resolve the obvious questions and significantly growing controversy surrounding the COVID-19 phenomenon – concerning whether it’s naturally-occurring or a man-made biological weapon? Some people are old enough and/or informed enough to have an awareness of the very serious U.S. Senate Church Committee Hearings in the 1970s on the C.I.A.’s nefarious and most-often criminal activities.

It seems clear beyond doubt another Washington, D.C. investigation based on the Church Committee Hearings model has become necessary to obtain the true facts on the monumentally consequential, unprecedented and historic COVID-19 global pandemic. The absence of an investigation is absolutely unacceptable.

Why?…

Because if COVID-19 was released on an unsuspecting and innocent humanity as part of a sophisticated covert biological warfare operation, then the criminals who are responsible must become identified and prosecuted to the fullest extent of existing law. If it becomes proven such is the case, our suggestion is hanging the covert war criminals by the throat until dead on a worldwide public live-streamed broadcast.

After all, COVID-19 is one of the mild (yet deadly) forms of biological weapon on the shelf, leaving any potential war criminals access to an even more deadly array of weapons to utilize in future strikes. This state of affairs must be taken on as a matter of utmost, immeasurable gravity and consequence.

Heaven help us all… One final summarizing word of advice: Investigate. Peace.

(Thank you to John Hankey at YouTube)