Malaysian Newspaper Charges Ukraine Shot Down MH17.

Posted on August 17, 2014

by Jerry Alatalo

Many around the world are making an effort to try to find the truth about what happened to Malaysian Flight MH17 which crashed in Eastern Ukraine last month. Malaysian newspaper The New Strait Times has recently published an article asserting Ukraine’s government was responsible. Close to 300 passengers perished. Those who’ve followed developments on the tragedy across the internet are aware that many articles have been published which contradict the narrative that pro-Russian Eastern Ukraine separatists or Russia shot the airliner down.

What, if any, relation the announcement by BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) of a new development bank to compete against the World Bank and International Monetary Fund has to the downing of MH17 – two days after that major announcement – is unknown.

While there seemed to be a rush to point the finger of blame at Eastern Ukraine separatists and/or Russia, in a previous reposted article retired U.S. military/intelligence men and women wrote an open letter to President Obama suggesting releasing to the public any evidence supporting administration claims of Russian involvement. MH17 is a very controversial issue which is being debated almost everywhere in the corporate media and alternative media over the internet. Thus far, few if any western mainstream media groups have commented on reports that contradict the U.S. government narrative pointing toward Russian accountability.

Frankly, an event the size of MH17, which could result in war on a level no man or woman wants to imagine, is of such high importance that how it’s been dealt with in corporate media and the halls of governments is extremely disturbing. Although the number of people killed was one tenth the number killed on September 11, 2001, the event was on the same scale of possible negative consequences and huge questions about criminal responsibility. MH17 and September 11 are alike in that all legitimate theories of what happened are not being presented to the public, as seen with government/media absence of response to possible scenarios and reasonable questions.

When a respected newspaper from Malaysia publishes an article pointing toward Ukraine’s government, and there’s no mention or analysis coming from U.S. politicians in Washington, European governments, Ukraine’s government or Western media, one is simply left with the strong feeling that something is wrong with this whole scenario. This situation is not being handled in the way it requires – with coördinated law enforcement efforts taken by the world’s best investigators.

Former U.S. Congressman and presidential candidate Ron Paul has said on air the “U.S. is likely hiding truth” about MH17. Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, his son and potential Republican nominee for president in 2016, has thus far not made any comment about his father’s MH17 assertions. Here again, one is left with no clear explanation for such an odd situation, where a father and former high level U.S. politician makes extremely controversial remarks and his high level U.S. politician son is silent.

With regard to MH17, what is so distressing and highly disappointing is the feeling that something not being right and very odd is felt by many people who have the power to get this extremely important issue on the correct path. Some party was behind the downing of MH17, people are acting very strangely over the shoot down and – because of the public’s confusion and failures of governments and media to deal with the event in ways which match its tremendous importance – it is urgent that capable people step forward and get the MH17 investigation straightened out as quickly as possible.

Information about MH17 and the Malaysian newspaper publishing the article claiming Ukraine’s government was behind the downing was found while viewing a weekly program by investigative journalists Kevin Barrett and James Fetzer. Both men are long-time writers on their personal sites along with other media outlets, and both men are former university professors. Kevin Barrett and James Fetzer have been guests on numerous talk radio and television programs over many years, often seen on Press TV and RT, while hosting their own radio talk shows dealing with a variety of “controversial” topics.

The following video is their program from August 14, 2014. They changed the name of their show recently from “Dynamic Duo” to “False Flag Weekly News”, covering current events in ways that may seem difficult for people who rarely hear or read alternative viewpoints.

Besides the MH17 Malaysian newspaper article, in this episode Mr. Barrett and Mr. Fetzer touch on the U.S. Centers for Disease Control patent on an Ebola virus, Russian health officials’ concerns Ebola may be a type of biological weapon, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Fukushima radiation and other topics.

Worth noting is that $1,000 debate challenges from both Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and Mr. Barrett on the official 9/11 Report and/or questionable collapse of Building 7 have resulted in zero debates – no credentialed man or woman academic, professional, or expert has stepped forward to argue in favor of the government’s version of events.

Unfortunately, since 2011 and the disaster at Fukushima, it looks that full-blown “China Syndrome” is occurring, the Pacific Ocean and all life in it has been perhaps irreparably harmed by massive dosing of radiation, and could be an “extinction level event“.

****

The topics covered are not easy to deal with and, for what it’s worth, it would be a better world if certain anxiety-producing situations didn’t exist. But certain situations do exist, it is important that citizens are aware of them, and for that reason the following video made by Mr. Barrett and Mr. Fetzer is made available. Comments are encouraged on these important and provocative issues.

****

(Thank you to noliesradio at YouTube)

Ukraine: President Olga Bogomolets?

Posted on May 11, 2014

by Jerry Alatalo

“In Aristotelian terms, the good leader must have ethos, pathos and logos. The ethos is his moral character, the source of his ability to persuade. The pathos is his ability to touch feelings, to move people emotionally. The logos is his ability to give solid reasons for an action, to move people intellectually.”

– MORTIMER J. ADLER American philosopher, educator

To readers who are unfamiliar with the name Olga Bogomolets, she is running for President of Ukraine. She is a doctor who was in Kiev treating victims of sniper fire during the large protests on the Maidan leading to Viktor Yanukovych leaving Ukraine and a change of government. Observers may or may not hold the opinion that the murder of over 100 police officers and civilian protesters in Kiev on and around February 20, 2014 is perhaps the most significant world event since the year 2000.

The major impetus of this article is to request help in getting Dr. Olga Bogomolets’ message to all Americans. Those who are familiar with this blog know that each article/post usually includes video from YouTube. Today, after viewing perhaps over 20 videos with Olga Bogomolets either being interviewed or giving a talk to the press, what I discovered was that it is literally impossible to find an understandable English-translated example of her messages after February 26, 2014 on YouTube.

Before going further, let me share another experience about videos that give viewers a translation option inside the video. In a previous post, “Who Is Vladimir Putin?”, a woman who has conducted a form of citizen diplomacy with USSR/Russia for over 30 years – Sharon Tennison – wrote an article about demonization of Vladimir Putin recently in the west by media organizations and politicians, in her attempt to correct erroneous perceptions.

Now, wanting to find out more about Sharon Tennison, a search quickly found two YouTube videos of her addressing a Russian audience with help from a woman interpreter. Ms. Tennison was talking about her book, “The Power of Impossible Ideas”, and her book tour in America. Now, choosing translated captions on those videos was probably unnecessary because Ms. Tennison spoke in English and the woman interpreting to the Russian audience was speaking the same message to the audience – but I took the English-translated option never-the-less.

What I discovered, and this relates directly to my asking for help in getting Dr. Olga Bogomolets’ message in English to Americans, was that nothing Ms. Tennison actually said, which I perfectly understood during her speaking, came across in the translated captions at the bottom of the screen. In other words, every bit and word Ms. Tennison spoke, in the translated interpreter’s captioned “English”, was wrong. To drive this point home, if the interpreter was by herself speaking Russian, and the option to have her words translated to English was chosen, every word she spoke would be translated wrong.

There are dozens of YouTube videos with Dr. Bogomolets speaking in them – in her foreign language (Ukrainian) – for various lengths of time, from one-minute to a half-hour to over an hour. For an English-speaking American, it is impossible to get her messages because the caption-translation YouTube option delivers incomprehensible gibberish.

Why is it important that Americans receive Ukrainian Dr. Olga Bogomolets’ messages in English?

1. Dr. Bogomolets was treating sniper victims in Kiev and noticed the wounds entering from behind as well as the fact that wounds were found near the eyes, neck, and heart – not to the arms or legs, but to kill.
2. Dr. Bogomolets’ name was brought up in the now world-known intercepted March 5 phone call between Eurpean Union high official Catherine Ashton and Estonian Foreign Minister Urmas Paet. Paet told Ashton that snipers were controlled by the “new coalition” not Viktor Yanukovych, that the snipers were killing both police and civilians, that the “new coalition” was unwilling to investigate, and that some of what he was saying to Ashton came from discussions with Olga Bogomolets.
3. Dr. Bogomolets declined an appointment as Ukraine’s top medical/health officer, because she “didn’t know any of these people.”
4. And because Dr. Olga Bogomolets, based on what she has experienced, made the life-changing decision to run for the top office – president – of Ukraine.

What I observed from correctly translated comments about incomprehensible-for-English-speakers videos of Olga Bogomolets is that a large percentage of those comments from Ukrainian people express the most positive wish to have Olga Bogomolets elected Ukraine’s next president. The reason Americans need to hear what she says stems from the fact that Ukrainians have been overwhelmed by the sheer spiritual and moral power coming from this woman doctor. The words used by Ukrainians in these comments express such a respect, honor, and profound admiration for Dr. Bogomolets’ political philosophy at this pivotal moment for Ukraine that Minnesota Senator Paul Wellstone comes to mind.

It is apparent that Olga Bogomolets shares with Paul Wellstone that very rare quality of men and women involved in governing of a real and mutual love between a leader and the people. For that reason, Dr. Bogomolets is a person who has a message that is universal and needs to become known by people around the world.

In summary, I believe Dr. Olga Bogomolets’ story, message, and profound decision to seek the approval of the Ukrainian people to become their leader represents perhaps the most important, consequential, single news event now present on this Earth.

If you know men or women living in Ukraine please contact them to discuss creative ways of contacting Dr. Bogomolets to arrange for English-language translations or English-language communications. At this time there are three websites – two related to her candidacy for president in Ukrainian, and her personal site in English.

You can send Dr. Olga Bogomolets an English-language email message at> bogomolets.com.

****

The following is the only English-language communication of Dr. Bogomolets available. This was from on or around February 20, 2014 discussing the “Maidan Massacre.” There are other videos posted at YouTube from as recently as May 2, 2014 (including televised in Ukraine presidential debates) but, as explained, they are incomprehensible to English speakers.

(Thank you to Verfassung1871 @ YouTube)