World Needs An Army Of Honest Accountants And Lawyers.

Posted January 26, 2014

by Jerry Alatalo

Suits 1“The type of character produced by wealth lies on the surface for all to see. Wealthy men are insolent and arrogant; their possession of wealth affects their understanding; they feel as if they had every good thing that exists; wealth becomes a standard of value for everything else, and therefore they imagine there is nothing they cannot buy. They are luxurious and ostentatious;… ostentatious and vulgar.”

– Aristotle

Oxfam International’s recent report showing that 85 people own wealth that is equal the wealth of 3.5 billion people has gone viral, leading to numerous articles and discussions in the world’s media outlets. After deciding to learn some more about Oxfam International, I learned that it is headed by a woman whose name is Winnie Byanyima.

So, then there was a search for recent interviews of Ms. Byanyima. There was one of her at a recent meeting on economic and business development in her homeland of Africa, where she expressed her concerns about the same wealth inequality on Earth explained in the viral report – which was published after this particular interview. She finds that economics and job-creation in African nations is reason for some excitement but with a few caveats.

Her concern has to do with the extreme wealth inequality as it relates to instability and insecurity. Ms. Byanyima has found that historical events on the continent have led to a situation where Africa’s tremendous natural resources wealth has exited through a variety of means. Among these are tax breaks and concessions, corruption and bribery, disappearing funds, and tax schemes which have allowed transnational corporations to avoid paying millions and billions of dollars.

This situation, where huge sums are escaping from African nations’ treasuries, has tied the hands of governments on the continent in relation to societal spending on education, health, and job-creation. Ms. Byanyima points out that this has led to poverty and frustration of the people, and is a major factor which has led to wars and killing on the continent. Her comments in that November 2013 interview reflected the reality which is Africa.

I next heard Ms. Byanyima when she was part of a six-member panel at the World Economic Forum in Switzerland held recently.

Many who are reading this understand the concept of “élite capture of wealth and power” leading to domination of political power in nations and regions around the Earth. The Oxfam report confirms that such a situation is real and is an issue which many are more intensely aware of.  When Ms. Byanyima spoke to the audience and her fellow panel members, I noticed that the woman moderator cut her off in mid-sentence almost every time, changing the subject and asking a separate-issue question of someone else on the stage.

Maybe, because I was keen on hearing more from Ms. Byanyima, it seemed that the white woman moderator was putting up roadblocks in front of her.  For example, at one point Ms. Byanyima was making a point about Africa’s “going down the road of more and more insecurity”, due to the fact that 6 of the 10 nations on Earth with the greatest wealth inequality were in Africa, when the moderator abruptly cut her off and changed the subject, turning to another panelist for comments.

She was able to make some important points. Regarding the lack of transparency in the transactions of transnational corporations in various African nations, Ghana has a law which requires very specific reporting to the Ghana government of how much oil is taken out of the ground, all contracts’ content, pricing and earnings, etc. At the same time Uganda has no such law or requirements for transnational corporations.

She was on the stage in Davos, Switzerland with political and business leaders – at the World Economic Forum for an hour-long discussion about the future of the African continent. Oxfam International had just released the viral “85 people” report. Oxfam is a non-governmental organization (NGO), Ms. Byanyima being the only person of six on the discussion panel associated with an NGO, the others consisted of three members (two black, one white) of the business community and two presidents (black) of African countries.

So, I went to look for more lengthy talks with Ms. Byanyima to learn more about Oxfam and the organization that produced the “85 people” viral report. While searching I found the following outstanding documentary “Stealing Africa: Why Poverty?” – which tells viewers in a more effective way what Winnie Byanmiya was trying to say at the World Economic Forum 2014. Come to think of it, the panel at Davos could have been part of the audience, replacing them with the audience’s viewing of this film.

About the film, let me first say that I was very surprised that I had never heard of it until today. For those who appreciate excellent documentaries, may I say that if you have not viewed this film yet, have concerns about the economic reality on Earth and wish to increase your awareness of that reality (the reality provided in the Oxfam report), you won’t be disappointed. Great credit goes to the producers of “Stealing Africa” for creating a powerful expose that identifies a world-wide practice that is responsible for most of the problems on this Earth in 2014.

The film focuses on Zambia, one of the world’s largest suppliers of copper, and the Zambian government’s relationship with Glencore Corporation, which has extracted billions of dollars of copper in the years since it started operations in Zambia. Without giving you a play-by-play of the documentary let me say that the film provides more confirmation to the writings of John Perkins in his blockbuster expose book, “Confessions of an Economic Hitman”. Perkins description of his job as an economic hitman mirrors what has occurred in Zambia perfectly.

The Zambian government took large loans from the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, came to the point where they could not meet the repayments, and then sold its state-run copper mining operation to private investors for cash. That the Zambian president when the sale occurred was later convicted of corruption, that he had 11 trunks full of designer clothing – 206 designer suits, 185 shirts, 36 jackets, 157 pairs of trousers, 64 pairs of shoes, and 74 ties (all expensive designer brands made in Switzerland and Italy) – and that Marc Rich, who founded the company and who was in the early 1980’s the world’s most-wanted white-collar criminal – eventually pardoned by William Jefferson Clinton in the last days of his presidency – add to the film’s extraordinary power.

That Glencore Corporation’s conversion from private to public made its CEO $8.8 billion, and 400 other employees over $100 million each, gives people a good clue how the world has “evolved” to the point where 85 individuals own as much wealth as 3.5 billion people.

****

For more information visit whypoverty.net

****

(Thank you to Why Poverty @ YouTube)

United Nations Action In Congo Offers Hope.

Rape has been used as a weapon of war in both ...
Rape has been used as a weapon of war in both the First Congo War and Second Congo War. Original caption states: “Photo: USAID/Leah Werchick; Rape victims who have been successfully reintegrated into their communities assemble in a “peace hut” near Walungu, South Kivu in DRC.” (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Posted November 6, 2013

by Jerry Alatalo

The long-suffering people of the Congo have been given some relief in the past few weeks thanks to military actions taken by the United Nations to halt the crimes of so-called M23 rebels in that country.

First, let me say that before the last few days I had no idea how horrific events in the Congo were. It can safely be said that, as an estimated 6,000,000 Congolese men, women, and children have been killed from 1996-2013, the situation in the Congo is an African holocaust. I have no explanation for there being no focus by mainstream news organizations on what has been occurring in the Congo. One can only guess. My guess is that absence of reporting on the Congo has something to do with the country’s tremendous natural resource wealth.

Let me ask you the reader. Were you aware that a literal holocaust has been occurring in the Congo? If not, why not? This is a very significant question which leads one to wonder if the events in the Congo from 1990 until today in 2013 have been censored by the mainstream media. Speaking for myself, I am astonished that I have not heard about how horrific the situation in that country has been, and that the unimaginable suffering of the people of the Congo is not in the minds of every man and woman on Earth.

How is it that the recent events regarding a possible escalation of war in Syria was front page, headline grabbing news for weeks, with hour upon hour upon hour of reports and commentaries, yet the Congo, where the world sees a literal genocide occurring, receives no mention? Surely there are managers and editors at these news outlets who have been aware of the horrific situation in the Congo. Just minutes ago the CBS Evening News headlined their program with the results of Virginia and New Jersey governor elections. Here is the issue and what has me so confounded. I do not recall a single mainstream report on the Congo – ever.

Pardon me for remaining on this media issue of choosing, deciding what is important to report. Let me say that the situation in Syria is tragic as well, and deserves journalistic attention. I am trying to wrap my mind around the lack of media attention and reporting on the Congo. My first thought is that there are men and women who are sitting on the boards of directors of both corporations that are involved in business surrounding the tremendous natural resource wealth of the Congo and mainstream media corporations.

My second possible explanation for media avoidance of reporting on the Congo-Rwanda-Uganda state of affairs is that there are potential consequences for media corporations if they tell the truth about Central Africa. Consequences like loss of advertisement revenue from corporations doing business in that region of Africa. Consequences like negative publicity for both corporations and the US government’s history in the wealthy, resource-rich region, leading to complications which have to do with criminal responsibility and prosecution.

United Nations correct to intervene militarily in the Congo.

If ever there were a correct application of the United Nations’ principle of “right to protect” (R2P), the Congo situation met the requirements. R2P has been somewhat controversial because there is debate about when the concept matches conditions in a region or country. My view is that there should be a push for a world military force overseen by the UN to carry out actions regarding situations which are severe enough to trigger R2P. I imagine every UN member state ceding their nation’s military operations to a planetary military force, or police force, if you will, comprised of men and women from every nation..

If and when all UN member states agree to such a planetary military arrangement, the United States would become able to reduce it’s defense spending significantly. If one can imagine a world police agency, this is my suggestion. The UN’s actions in the Congo recently, which halted the rebel group M23, is an example of the actions such a world police force would carry out.

A legal entity mirroring the Nuremberg Trials should be convened to prosecute those responsible for the African holocaust in Central Africa.

Given the death statistics of the ongoing war in Central Africa, one can conclude that the events there rise to the level of being perhaps the largest mass murder in human history. After the Second World War those responsible for the holocaust were tried in Nuremburg, Germany for crimes against humanity and genocide.

The Congolese people, who have suffered the loss of over 6,000,000 mothers, fathers, sisters, and brothers – after those who have been responsible are prosecuted and receive appropriate punishment – can try to begin living normal lives.

****