ome people have, as most journalists experience, various levels of negative opinions of Luke Rudkowski of We Are Change. But try to name one other journalist who’s gotten directly into the faces of Rothschild, Kissinger, Silverstein etc., and now – Donald Rumsfeld. Mr. Rudkowski recently ran into the former Secretary of Defense during the time of 9/11 in 2001, and asked him about World Trade Center Building 7, the 3rd skyscraper to collapse on September 11, and about which virtually every man, woman and child on Earth knows about.
Consider this:
In response to the “smoking gun” controversy surrounding Building 7, Rumsfeld told Luke Rudkowski: “I don’t know anything about that.”
There are people who’ll see this short three-minute video and react with laughter, or get some kind of “kick” out of hearing Rumsfeld, frankly, lie through his teeth. Unfortunately, what Rudkowski captured on film and audio is far, far from a laughing matter. It’s impossible to describe this encounter, this historical record, in any other manner but as deadly serious business… Because those responsible for 9/11, including Donald Rumsfeld, have yet to face prosecution for the profoundly negative-consequence war crimes they’ve committed.
Metaphorically speaking, and to illustrate how preposterous and disturbing Rumsfeld’s statement is – it’s as if he is saying he’s unaware that the sky is blue, or that the grass is green. Rumsfeld’s words were beyond the point of – far beyond the point of – ridiculous, and in a world with the slightest sense of morality and justice would produce loud and unanimous, across-the-board and directly clear, demands for a necessary, new, real investigation of 9/11.
In what might seem to some as an insignificant though gutsy effort at revealing the truth, Luke Rudkowski’s confrontation with Donald Rumsfeld was a truly courageous journalistic act, and…
“They say that knowledge is power. I used to think so, but I now know that they mean money.”
– Lord Byron (1788-1824)
Yesterday we posted an interview of retired head of U.S. Army Strategic Intelligence, Major General Albert Stubblebine. In that interview Mr. Stubblebine, the highest ranking U.S. military person to publicly state that the official 9/11 Commission Report was false, shared his experience of having his entire world perception shaken to the core. With the ability he developed from 32 years in the U.S. military, with a particular emphasis on photographic analysis, his study of the damage done at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 led him to believe that the official government story was wrong.
Now, for a man with Mr. Stubblebine’s military experience to publicly state that the government was in effect lying about the events of September 11, 2001 is at the very least disturbing. If any person reading this has researched Albert Stubblebine and can share your opinion here, please do so in the comments. I have only just discovered his interview and would greatly appreciate your honest opinions.
Since posting the 19-minute interview of Albert Stubblebine yesterday, I have found one other interview that was slightly over an hour. The comments after that interview were varied but perhaps 80-90% seemed to express the belief the Mr. Stubblebine is truthful, and that what he is saying about September 11, 2001 is what he believes is true. He is over 80 years old, an elder, that segment of the population many spiritual traditions hold in the highest respect because the elders have attained wisdom.
So, it is difficult to believe that a man over 80 years old and moving closer to the great transition commonly called death could falsely contradict the government and people that he spent decades serving. In the over hour-long interview he notes that he has decided to decline interviews with any person but person(s) that he trusts, because interviewers broke promises to let him watch interwiews before publication. He shares in that interview his experience of removing the “blinders” and “earmuffs” – after he retired from the military, he talks about “waking up”.
Alfred Stubblebine seems like an honest man who, because of his public statements contradicting the official story on September 11, has received blows to his reputation and honor. And would an octogenarian make a choice to intentionally lie and cause confusion? In other words, either Alfred Stubblebine is telling the full truth or he missed his calling as a dramatic actor. When one considers his age of over 80 years, his 32 years of military service, and the way he speaks in what seems like without pretense, it becomes hard to conclude but that he speaks truth. Once again, please either agree or disagree here, including details about why you agree or disagree, to provide clarification for myself and readers. Thank you.
Please share any opinion or knowledge you may have of Major General Albert Stubblebine’s wife, Dr. Rima Laibow, who in the following video gets interviewed by “We Are Change” and Luke Rudowski. Luke Rudowski is a fellow who I admire for his guts and courage in confronting the powerful. Dr. Rima is a woman I’ve listened to just today after looking for more interviews of her husband. Just the same as her husband, I listened to another over one hour-long interview of Rima Laibow and find her as intelligent and credible.
Having only just found this husband and wife and their astonishing messages in the last few days, without researching them, one finds it hard to remove the last feelings of doubt about the truthfulness of what they are sharing and asserting. With regard to Rima Laibow, there is a certain amount of agreement based simply on my reading of naturopathic books in the past. So, I concur with her on the subjects of pharmaceuticals (she says she has never prescribed them to patients), vaccinations (not because of any scientific knowledge I have but I sense that they are not good), GMO because of my modest research, and geoengineering (although no governments have even admitted it is occurring, or why), with thousands of homemade videos of planes spraying extended contrails around the world for view on the internet.
Her connecting of pharmaceutical, agribusiness, medicine/health, and chemical companies through interlocking directorates, and her use of the term “Uber-Cartel” seems understandable from the standpoint of having read Ben Bagdikian’s book “The Media Monopoly”, where he explains the interlocking directorate scenario of media conglomerates.
The most difficult aspect of Rima Laibow’s assertions to deal with is her claims about eugenics or depopulation. Is it possible that those in the Uber-Cartel have plans to reduce the number of human beings by 90%? Frankly, it’s hard to even type the question, as it suggests a level of diabolical thinking that is in many ways – in all ways – unthinkable. Based on the sense of honesty in Albert Stubblebine’s voice, one would think that if he’s honest so is his wife.
So, with regard to Major General Albert Stubblebine and his wife Dr. Rima Laibow, there is no doubt that what they have and are saying is nothing but astonishing. Is it overwhelmingly false or, God forbid, overwhelmingly true? I sincerely ask for comments on these folks from you, because, if their information is false I have to take down their interviews – this blog is intent on posting only the truth. Either Mr. Stubblebine and Dr. Laibow have no problems with leading people on the wrong, dishonorable track of lies and disinformation or…
What comes after “or” is beyond humanity’s worst nightmare.
Palestinians are at the heart of the conflict in the M.E Palestinians uprooted by force of arms.. Yet faced immense difficulties have survived, kept alive their history and culture, passed keys of family homes in occupied Palestine from one generation to the next.
This blog is devoted to legal, historical and human rights matters, in which issues of general concern are addressed freely and spontaneously. It is intended to further an informal exchange of views in the democratic spirit of freedom of opinion and respect for the opinions of others, in an effort to understand rather than condemn, to propose constructive solutions rather than grandstand. The perspective is both from inside and outside the box and the added value lies more in the questions than in the answers.
ome people have, as most journalists experience, various levels of negative opinions of Luke Rudkowski of We Are Change. But try to name one other journalist who’s gotten directly into the faces of Rothschild, Kissinger, Silverstein etc., and now – Donald Rumsfeld. Mr. Rudkowski recently ran into the former Secretary of Defense during the time of 9/11 in 2001, and asked him about World Trade Center Building 7, the 3rd skyscraper to collapse on September 11, and about which virtually every man, woman and child on Earth knows about.
THE ONENESS of HUMANITY 