Rumsfeld: The One Human Being “Unaware” Of Building 7?

By Jerry Alatalo

RethinkAlphabet Some people have, as most journalists experience, various levels of negative opinions of Luke Rudkowski of We Are Change. But try to name one other journalist who’s gotten directly into the faces of Rothschild, Kissinger, Silverstein etc., and now – Donald Rumsfeld. Mr. Rudkowski recently ran into the former Secretary of Defense during the time of 9/11 in 2001, and asked him about World Trade Center Building 7, the 3rd skyscraper to collapse on September 11, and about which virtually every man, woman and child on Earth knows about.

Consider this:

In response to the “smoking gun” controversy surrounding Building 7, Rumsfeld told Luke Rudkowski: “I don’t know anything about that.”

There are people who’ll see this short three-minute video and react with laughter, or get some kind of “kick” out of hearing Rumsfeld, frankly, lie through his teeth. Unfortunately, what Rudkowski captured on film and audio is far, far from a laughing matter. It’s impossible to describe this encounter, this historical record, in any other manner but as deadly serious business… Because those responsible for 9/11, including Donald Rumsfeld, have yet to face prosecution for the profoundly negative-consequence war crimes they’ve committed.

Metaphorically speaking, and to illustrate how preposterous and disturbing Rumsfeld’s statement is – it’s as if he is saying he’s unaware that the sky is blue, or that the grass is green. Rumsfeld’s words were beyond the point of – far beyond the point of – ridiculous, and in a world with the slightest sense of morality and justice would produce loud and unanimous, across-the-board and directly clear, demands for a necessary, new, real investigation of 9/11.

In what might seem to some as an insignificant though gutsy effort at revealing the truth, Luke Rudkowski’s confrontation with Donald Rumsfeld was a truly courageous journalistic act, and…

Historic.

(Thank you to We Are Change at YouTube)

Advertisements

20 thoughts on “Rumsfeld: The One Human Being “Unaware” Of Building 7?

  1. Jerry, Jerry, Jerry… here is an excerpt from the official report and confirmed by ALL other agencies..except the “Truthers” of course:

    “After the North Tower collapsed, some firefighters entered 7 World Trade Center to search the building.

    They attempted to extinguish small pockets of fire, but low water pressure hindered their efforts. Over the course of the day, fires burned out of control on several floors of 7 World Trade Center; the flames visible on the east side of the building.

    During the afternoon, fire was also seen on floors 6–10, 13–14, 19–22, and 29–30.

    In particular, the fires on floors 7 through 9 and 11 through 13 continued to burn out of control during the afternoon.

    At approximately 2:00 pm, firefighters noticed a bulge in the southwest corner of 7 World Trade Center between the 10th and 13th floors, a sign that the building was unstable and might collapse.

    During the afternoon, firefighters also heard creaking sounds coming from the building.

    Around 3:30 pm, FDNY Chief Daniel A. Nigro decided to halt rescue operations, surface removal, and searches along the surface of the debris near 7 World Trade Center and evacuate the area due to concerns for the safety of personnel.

    According to FEMA, the building started to collapse at 5:20:33 pm EDT when the east mechanical penthouse started crumbling, but differing times are given as to what time the building completely collapsed—at 5:21:10 pm EDT according to FEMA, and at 5:20:52 pm EDT according to NIST.

    There were no casualties associated with the collapse.”

    Like

    1. Aaron,
      The point made by posting Donald Rumsfeld’s irrational attempt to convince whoever came to see his encounter with Luke is that it’s impossible for the Secretary of Defense to say he is unaware of Building 7 – without lying. For Building 7 to drop into its own “footprint”, proven and agreed upon by 1,000s of architects and engineers, all the columns at the base of the structure had to fail simultaneously, only possible through controlled demolition. While the attempt to provide a scientifically unrealistic theory gets an “A for effort”, my only response who be to ask your opinion of the investigations of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. That Building 7 came down with explosives is the correct analysis and long-known “slam dunk”. A new investigation, for anyone serious about the truth, is an urgent matter because major-league criminals are walking as free men.

      Like

      1. I don’t get the point of the you whole exercise.
        First with regards to Rumsfeld’s dodging the question, its only to be expected.

        You have a highly sensitive tenant that just lost most of its documents and computers to a collapsing building. You have a former defense secretary. How can you expect him to have a conversation on a subject matter with a jo-blow citizen without the required security clearance?

        Give me a break.

        With regard to the building’s collapse, who cares anyway?
        Why is it even relevant to the price of tea in China?
        All that was lost was brick and mortar and millions from from the pocket of Silverstein and other creditors

        Even if there was a “controlled demolition” who cares? Perhaps it was deemed a safety hazard if it would continue to burn endlessly whereby eventually one side would in fact collapse and fall all over the place.

        Don’t forget the firefighters saw the building start to bulge on one side so clearly the fires and heat were having an effect on the building making its collapse eminent. I agree it looks “engineered” however I also think its a coincidence.

        Do you recall how the twin towers came down? They burnt for hours 3/4 of the way up and suddenly the whole building collapsed in an almost perfectly symmetrical column of debris and dust? Was that also engineered?

        Like

        1. Perhaps you’ve heard of Christopher Bollyn. If not, a post with video of him speaking on 9/11 just went up. If so, and you’d be interested in discussing Mr. Bollyn’s perceptions along with those of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, we would also be willing to in an effort to arrive at any possible, just, reasonable conclusions.

          Like

            1. Aaron,
              If dissemination of developments on the issue of September 11, 2001 results in either identifying untruths being told about that day or providing a truer picture of actual facts then it is beneficial to do so. Millions of people are of the opinion that the official 9/11 Commission Report was a whitewash, continuing irresolution of unanswered questions posed by serious and respected individuals maintains significantly separative/divisive situations among those who perceive the events differently, so any effort aimed at settling or resolving those legitimate questions is worthwhile.

              Like

              1. The only main unanswered question was in the days immediately following the attack, while US airspace was closed, why did the bush administration allow a large quantity of Saudi nationals to leave the country in their private jets without any scrutiny? We know of the Bush family’s connections to mid-east oil from the time of the 1940’s. My concern is were they protecting anyone? All the other conspiracy theories, building 7 and all that stuff is mere nonsense.

                Regards

                Like

                1. Aaron,
                  Your comment reinforces the argument of those in Congress asking for the “28 Pages”, apparently showing Saudi financing, to be declassified and available for every American to read. If that were to happen, and Americans deserve to know the truth, it would result in a new (real) investigation of 9/11, including the Saudi connection, plus addressing any/all legitimate, remaining concerns or unanswered questions.

                  Like

                  1. Nothing wrong with the investigation other then the Saudi involvement.

                    911 one way or the other was orchestrated and carried by Muslims who hate Christians and Jews. Bottom line, nothing else interests me nor should it anyone else.
                    We should be focusing on the eradication of this cancer period. Once that is done we can all sit around the campfire and sing kumbaya.

                    Like

                    1. It seems the best argument for conducting a new investigation of 9/11, which could be done very cheaply, is that it is important to heal a very toxic and divisive situation where half the American people trust the 9/11 Commission Report and half do not. The division is real, has lasting real negative consequences, and is essentially a persisting national disease until it is successfully treated and healed.

                      Like

                    2. Again, too many more important things in the world today that need looking into. Let’s get rid of Daesh, Al-Queda, Al-Nusra, Boko-Haram, Hizballah and Hamas first.

                      Then with all the extra time on our hands we can deal with world poverty, climate change, health, corruption etc.

                      Then still only after all of the above is solved would i waste four quarters for the “911” conspiracies. Oh wait… even before that we should put to bed the Apollo 11 moon landing, Roswell and UFO’s and the Bermuda Triangle as these guys have been in line for verification way before 911.

                      Like

                    3. George Bush, Dick Cheney, and Tony Blair are responsible for lying and conducting a war of aggression against Iraq, the supreme crime on Earth in the eyes of virtually all international law experts. Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar, with help from the same group of British and American power brokers, have trained, equipped and paid ISIS from the start. Those extremely tragic examples define illegal war and state-sponsored terrorism. Every nation on Earth must sign the Rome Statue and agree to come under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, otherwise powerful leaders will continue committing war crimes and crimes against humanity with impunity.

                      Like

  2. Sorry, a little dissens: if “virtually every man, woman and child on Earth” would know about.Building 7, I would be fine! But unfortunately many have their “eyes wide shut”! By the way I admire your patience with that guy “Falk-Uncensored”, who has too fixed an agenda to be convinced of any clear view.

    “USA and Israel, the Helpless Giant and his Mad Dog: are there more dirty secrets?“

    http://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2014/08/12/usa-and-israel-the-helpless-giant-and-his-mad-dog-are-there-more-dirty-secrets/

    Best regards
    Andreas Schlüter
    Sociologist
    Berlin, Germany

    Like

    1. Andreas,
      Nice to meet you. Thank you for commenting. One senses great truths (lies) are about to become revealed, starting with the “28 Pages”, and that because of those revelations a major transformation of human civilization, holding war criminals to account, is set to occur. For that people can be very thankful.
      Thanks,
      Jerry

      Like

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s