The World ‘Knows’ Bin Laden Did 9/11 — So Why Isn’t There Any Evidence?

Vietnam veteran Geoffrey O’Neill’s powerful and impeccable writing and the facts surrounding September 11, 2001 are impossible to deny, impossible to forget, and impossible to ignore.

Truth and Shadows

The media continues to show no interest in the lack of evidence against bin Laden.

Saudi ‘monster’ pronounced guilty by government decree

“A lie told once is lie but a lie told a thousand times becomes the truth.”—German propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels

By Geoffrey O’Neill (Special to Truth and Shadows)

He is arguably the most notorious person in the 21st century.

The world takes for granted that Osama bin Laden was the architect of the “terror attacks” of Sept. 11, 2001. But why was this man singled out for this horrific crime? How did we learn of his alleged guilt? And what is the evidence used to support his guilt?

These questions are critical because the allegation against bin Laden led, less than a month later (on Oct. 7, 2001), to the launching of the Global War on Terror with the invasion of

View original post 2,587 more words

Advertisements

The Crucifixion Of Julian Assange.

By Jerry Alatalo

***

“Persecution is the first law of society because it is always easier to suppress criticism than to meet it.”

– HOWARD MUMFORD JONES (1892-1980) American writer

ournalist Julian Assange remains silenced in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London while charged with no crime. He has been a prisoner there for more than six years. One might say Julian Assange is being unjustly crucified in front of the world.

Head of the Internet Party of New Zealand Suzie Dawson’s 3-hour interview on “Ramola D Reports” at YouTube (from January) might qualify as the most important internet interview of 2018. Her support of Julian Assange and WikiLeaks made her a target of Western intelligence agencies along with Internet Party founder and fellow New Zealander Kim Dotcom – targeted with other supporters of Julian Assange around the Earth – in an irrational process where activists simply wishing to create a better world through education of citizens become treated as terrorists.

Suzie Dawson’s initial impetus for becoming more active came when she, along with millions of people around the world, became very excited about the potential good that might come from the 2011 Occupy Movement in the United States, only to find herself disappointed and wondering how such a momentous, historic event received zero coverage from corporate media outlets. She asked herself, if such a massive and thunderous event in New York City is met by total silence from mainstream media, “what else aren’t they reporting on?”

Two words are used by Ms. Lawson to describe her set of reasons for becoming more and more determined and active over the months and years since Occupy in 2011: “Righteous indignation”. Her experience and the experiences of other so-called whistleblowers such as Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning, William Binney, Mark Weibe and many more make clear the real risks involved for anyone – unless and until major positive change dependent on greater/increased awareness occurs – willing to get involved with sharing disturbing, deep, long-secreted government-military facts in the widest manner possible.

In addition to ending any further debate on the authenticity of WikiLeaks and Julian Assange through planted disinformation and smears such as “Julian Assange never mentions Israel”, “WikiLeaks denies 9/11 truth”, “Assange is a C.I.A. plant … limited hangout” etc., she also defeats through internet examples and argument the same style of smear campaign run against Edward Snowden. Suzie Dawson suggests simply going to the WikiLeaks website, typing “Israel” and “9/11” in the search box, pressing “enter”, and seeing the tens of thousands of (100% factual, verified, original) documents on Israel and 9/11 to understand the massive disinformation efforts perpetrated against Julian Assange.

“The militaries run the world … WikiLeaks supports whistleblowers facing life-and-death situations, therefore we must save Julian Assange … Julian Assange saved Edward Snowden’s life … WikiLeaks is the #1 target of Western intelligence agencies.”

***

The host of this amazing interview, “Ramola D”, deals with targeted individuals, directed energy weaponry and silent punishment of dissidents and/or whistleblowers (or random “test” subjects), a topic which has been somewhat controversial because of (thus far) limited research due to its relatively recent emergence. Suzie Dawson accepted the invitation for an interview with Ramola D because she wanted to share WikiLeaks information on the approximate 2014 introduction, global sales and marketing of directed energy and electronic weapons, classified as “electronic warfare” or “non-lethal weapons”. Ms. Dawson took this interview in part as an action to support targeted individuals who often become labeled as suffering from mental illness.

***

WikiLeaks has 10,000,000 (ten million) documents, and Suzie Dawson’s essential message is that people need only spend time at the website searching, finding and reading the massive storehouse of information “just sitting there”. She has the same message with respect to the Edward Snowden files.

Suzie Dawson and Elizabeth Vos of Disobedient Media hosted over 10-hours of interviews/statements of support during early June called “Unity4J” (Unity for Julian Assange). The organized effort was an Online Vigil calling for Julian Assange’s freedom featuring Cynthia McKinney, Caitlin Johnstone, Vivian Kubrick, Cassandra Fairbanks, William Craddick, Marc Crispin Miller, Jimmy Dore, Lee Camp, Lee Stranahan, Kevin Zeese, Mark Sleboda, Dmitri Babich, Jack Posobiec, Ciaron O’Reilley, Peter Lavelle, Kim Dotcom, Ross Cameron, Greg Barns, H.A. Goodman, Niko House, Graham Elwood … and found here.

Free Julian Assange.

***

(Thank you to Ramola D Reports – YouTube | Length: 2 hours, 59 minutes)

9/11 Activists Urge Iran Appeal In U.S. Courts.

By Jerry Alatalo

“A wise man, therefore, proportions his belief to the evidence.”

– DAVID HUME (1711-1776) Scottish philosopher

he government of Iran has been urged to act quickly to appeal a U.S. court judgment of complicity in the events of 9/11. The urgent invitation was offered by researchers and activists who assert they hold the evidence for overturning the decision. In what most informed observers perceive as a completely irrational, nefarious and politically provocative legal move – and in a process Iran ignored and never engaged with, Iran was eventually “ordered” to pay $6 billion to surviving family members of 9/11 victims. The deadline for Iran’s appeal – should their government decide to challenge the U.S. court system – is only hours away on Wednesday May 30.

Were the Iranians to appeal the decision, long-time determined men and women activists would be feeling added encouragement – after the petition for a Grand Jury was officially served on April 10 in New York City by the Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry – that their wish for a new investigation of 9/11 will become reality. The U.S. Attorney in New York has the obligation by law to act upon the petition by the Lawyers Committee, and, should the petition be denied, the Lawyers Committee has the right of pursuing additional legal (mandamus) action making it impossible for the government to block the initiative’s moving forward – effectively forcing the U.S. Attorney to act.

Were Iran to choose the appeal process and accept the extremely strong body of research, facts and evidence of the (currently) over 40 men and women who signed the letter urging Iran to appeal, one could foresee a situation where the global spotlight on 9/11 shines at an unprecedented level since September 11, 2001. One might describe such a development as the lighting of a fuse which leads to the blowing up of the greatest military false flag deception of the 21st century, quite possibly the most decisive and consequential in world history.

While millions around the Earth wish for Iran to appeal and accept the help of researchers, academics, military experts and investigative journalists in challenging the official U.S. government narrative as put forward in the “9/11 Commission Report”, the idea of measuring the magnitude of the decision reveals that instances of such historical importance and enormity are very rare – thus making a correct assessment close to impossible.

One thing is certain. An Iranian appeal would represent and fully entail, among others, the following descriptive terms:

  • Off-the-charts
  • Paradigmatic
  • World-changing
  • Volcanic
  • Stupendous.

***

(Thank you to PressTV at YouTube)

Featured

9/11 Truth Legal Battle Shifts Into High Gear.

By Jerry Alatalo

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry

Petition to U.S. Attorney to Report Federal Crimes to Grand Jury

he nonprofit public interest organization, the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc. is filing a Petition with the U. S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York formally requesting, pursuant to federal statute, that he present to a special grand jury extensive evidence of thus-far unprosecuted federal crimes relating to the destruction of three World Trade Center (WTC) Towers on 9/11/01. The evidence presented in the Petition and the exhibits thereto is considered by the Lawyers’ Committee, after careful evaluation, to be conclusive.

In the Petition, the Lawyers’ Committee explains that the U. S. Attorney is legally required to present the evidence submitted to a grand jury. The 52-page Petition, accompanied by 57 exhibits, presents extensive scientific and eye-witness evidence that explosives were used to destroy three WTC buildings on 9/11, including:

1) Independent scientific laboratory analysis of WTC dust samples showing the presence of high-tech explosives and/or incendiaries in the form of thermite or thermate.

2) Testimony of numerous New York firefighters who were 9/11 First Responders that they heard sounds of explosions and saw explosions on 9/11 at the WTC resembling controlled demolitions, and some reported seeing molten iron like in a foundry.

3) Testimony and scientific analysis by numerous architects, engineers, physicists, and chemists which demonstrates conclusively that the WTC Twin Towers and WTC Building 7 were brought down by use of explosives and incendiaries, not by airplane impacts or the resulting jet fuel and building fires.

4) Expert analysis of seismic evidence that explosions occurred at the WTC towers on 9/11 prior to the airplane impacts, and prior to the building collapses.

The Petition presents scientific reports and testimony explaining that the documented presence of molten iron proves that temperatures were present at Ground Zero much higher than those that jet fuel and building contents could create when burned, extreme temperatures consistent with use of the high tech explosive and incendiary materials called thermite and thermate.

The Petition also presents scientific reports and testimony explaining that the presence of previously molten iron microspheres, which have been established as present in the WTC dust in large quantities by electron microscope analysis of WTC dust samples, by both government and independent scientists, is scientifically impossible based on the burning of jet fuel and office contents alone but would be expected from the use of thermite or thermate.

Video evidence is also presented that shows the ejection during the collapse of WTC 1 and 2 of heavy steel elements laterally some distance from these WTC buildings which would not be possible from a gravity-driven collapse.

In addition, the Petition notes that scientific analysis, eyewitness testimony, and government reports confirm sulfidation and high temperature corrosion of the steel found in the rubble after the collapse of the WTC towers and WTC 7, a phenomenon not expected in a jet fuel fire and gravity driven collapse but consistent with the use of thermate.

The Petition cites longstanding federal court precedent that recognizes that a grand jury may act independently of any branch of government. The Petition adds that Federal law, 18 U.S.C. § 3332(a), requires the United States Attorney who receives information concerning an alleged federal crime from any person, if requested by that person, to provide that information to a special grand jury. The Petition emphasizes that this federal law creates a duty on the part of the United States Attorney, and removes the prosecutor’s discretion in deciding whether to present information to the grand jury.

The Petition cites the law that makes it a federal offense to bomb places of public use and government facilities. In the Petition, the Lawyers’ Committee concludes that the scientific, video, and eye-witness evidence taken together is conclusive that explosive and incendiary devices that had been pre-placed at the WTC were detonated causing the complete collapse of the World Trade Center Twin Towers on 9/11, substantially increasing the tragic loss of life from the terrorist attacks. The Lawyers’ Committee states unequivocally that the evidence permits no other conclusion — as a matter of science, as a matter of logic, and as a matter of law.

Pointing out that these crimes were not committed by a single person acting alone but rather by several persons acting in concert, the Petition urges that the attention of the jurors should not be limited simply to the bombing crime but should include a full inquiry into the crimes of aiding and abetting and conspiracy, and into those who may be guilty of these additional crimes, whether or not such parties are principals (direct perpetrators).

The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry is a nonprofit, 501(c)(3) organization whose mission is to promote transparency and accountability regarding 9/11. The Lawyers’ Committee’s work includes conducting investigations and public education in the public interest regarding matters related to the tragic events of September 11, 2001 and the circumstances leading up to and following those events. A primary focus of the Lawyers’ Committee is government accountability for the diligent investigation and prosecution of those responsible for the crimes related to 9/11 (whether those responsible are foreign or domestic individuals, corporations, or government entities).

***

(Transcript of Press Event – April 10, 2018)

“Witness this historic press conference”

Les Jamieson: Hello. My name is Les Jamieson. I’m a big supporter and participant with the efforts of the Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Truth. We want to welcome everybody to witness this historic press conference. This is the culmination of many, many years of hard work of researchers and activists all involved in a quest for the true explanation and full spectrum analysis and exposing of all the evidence of the events of 9/11. And this is also, more specifically, a culmination of three years of hard work and research and strategizing by a team of lawyers called the Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Truth. Right … Let me rephrase it … They are a nonprofit organization called the Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry.

Their website is LCFor911.org. And there’s a groundbreaking article on Op-Ed news.com about this event today by Andrew Craig. We urge everybody to go to Op-Ed news.com … send a million people there to read the article, and then also to the website LCFor911.org.. With that I’m going to introduce you to the attorneys and also you’re going to hear from a 9/11 family member Bob McIlvaine. And first we’re going to start off with Julio Gomez. He’s on the board for the Lawyers for 9/11 Inquiry and is part of the entire process to formulate this grand jury petition.

***

Continue reading “9/11 Truth Legal Battle Shifts Into High Gear.”