Ending Apartheid In Israel: Beyond Zionism To Democracy.

Posted January 21, 2014

by Jerry Alatalo

cumberland 1-1“From time immemorial it has been repeated, with hypocrisy, that men are equal; and from time immemorial the most degrading and the most monstrous inequality ceaselessly weigh on the human race.”

– Pierre Sylvain Marechal (1750-1803)

There is no benefit that can be gained from describing the Israel-Palestine situation in early 2014 as anything but what it is: apartheid. Just as nobody was predicting the end of American apartheid conditions in the 1960’s, or the end of South Africa’s apartheid system in the late 80’s /early 90’s, the same applies for Israel’s apartheid system in 2014.

To begin, there is a need for a few historical corrections on the beginnings of the state of Israel. Many are under the illusion that Israel in 1947 had to fight off Arab armies to set up the new nation. The truth is that the Palestinian people had nothing compared to Israelis in the way of military power in 1947. What occurred from 1947-48 was an ethnic cleansing of an essentially unarmed Palestinian population, with destruction of schools, churches, mosques, homes, and displacement of over 1 million original inhabitants of Palestine from their lands and homes.

At the time there were 500,000 Israelis and 1,500,000 Palestinians, and the largest portion of the land came under the control of the smaller population, while the smallest portion of the land went to the largest population – the Palestinians. So, Israel facing great Arab armies to establish their nation is a misperception – only after the ethnic cleansing and removal of Palestinians was there any reaction from Middle Eastern people in any military manner.

The next misperception in need of correction relates to the previous one: many have the view that Israelis and Arabs have fought each other for thousands of years – that this is “the way it is” and nothing possibly can be done to change the situation. There was no such fighting until after 1947, absolutely not going back thousands of years.

1967 was the pivotal timeframe in Israeli-Palestinian relations. When Egyptian President Nasser removed United Nations peacekeepers from the Sinai Peninsula, there was debate between older and younger members of the Israeli military about going to war with Egypt. The older Israeli military were reticent and worried about severe consequences from entering into war with Egypt, including a repeat of Nazi-like atrocities which occurred a few decades earlier. The younger military members held the view that Egypt’s military was “not prepared for war, we should strike now”. And they did.

So, another misperception which needs correction is that Israelis fought and defeated the Egyptians in 1967 because Israel was under attack by “massive Arab armies” – an existential threat to the nation of Israel. The correct historic version is that Israelis saw an “opportunity” and not any existential threat. Israel decimated Egypt’s military in the “Six Days War”, at the same time taking the West Bank, Gaza Strip and the Sinai Peninsula – essentially wiping Palestine off the map.

From the mid 1970’s through 1993 Palestinians, represented by the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) spoke with so-called “renegade” Zionists to find a resolution, but never with the true Zionist leaders of Israel until after 1993. An agreement in Washington, D.C. in 1995 between Israel’s Yitzhak Rabin and the PLO’s Yassar Arafat was the last, best chance for peace between Israelis and Palestinians, ended after Rabin was shot and killed in Israel following a speech to 100,000 at a peace rally by a right-wing Israeli law student.

Another misperception in need of correction is the view that Palestinians are not willing to make concessions to reach a peace agreement. In truth it is not Palestinians unwillingness to make concessions that has blocked a real agreement, but, since Israel has flooded the West Bank with highways, infrastructure, homes and apartments after forcing Palestinians from their homes and land, it is impossible for Israel to make concessions.

In 2014 the only solution which provides the next, best chance for real peace is a one-state solution where all people, both Israelis and Palestinians, live in a true democracy with equal rights for all. It will be necessary to create a mass movement of world proportions like that which occurred to force the end of apartheid in South Africa, and the end to apartheid in America – to end apartheid in Israel. That is the inescapable reality.

There are now three sets of laws in Israel:

Laws for Israeli Jews

Laws (discriminatory) for Palestinians living in Israel

Laws (apartheid) for Palestinians living in the West Bank and Gaza

The Israeli education system is Zionist and teaches racism. The Israeli bureaucracy makes life impossible for Palestinians.

Any man or woman on Earth who has an interest in learning the real history of Israel-Palestine would do well to listen and learn from the man in the following interview. His name is Miko Peled, author of the book, “The General’s Son: Journey of an Israeli in Palestine”. He was born and grew up in Jerusalem and his father was a general in the Israeli defense forces. His talks are widely available on the internet, with many over hour-long videos on YouTube which will allow you to zero in on what the real history is.

Mr. Peled is a man who came to change his perceptions from those taught in the schools he attended while growing up in Israel, eventually becoming a peace activist advocating for democratic reforms in his home country. He describes the Israeli army as “the best-fed, best-equipped terrorist organization in the world”. He describes one particular day in September 2008 as “the most shameful day in Israel’s history”, when Israel’s army carpet-bombed Gaza with 100 tons of bombs (one ton capable of destroying a city block in very densely populated Gaza), delivered at 11:25 AM, when most of the 800,000 Palestinian schoolchildren were on the streets – the beginning of 21 days of slaughter.

He strongly suggests that Zionism, like racism – like apartheid – must go. Israelis and Palestinians must build a true democracy where all people become treated equally. In fact, he believes this is the only solution.

On Iran, Miko Peled believes that so-called “threats” from Iran’s supposed nuclear ambitions are nothing but a “smokescreen” which has been used to divert growing attention from Israel’s apartheid regime. Politicians in the United States have to go along with the Zionist’s agenda or face defeat in elections. The U.S. has strategic, geopolitical reasons for providing billions of taxpayers’ dollars annually to wealthy Israel, while going along with the charade of an impossible “two-state solution”.

Please find and listen to more talks by Miko Peled and read his book “The General’s Son: Journey of an Israeli in Palestine”. He is a true peacemaker.

Moral and ethical power from the world’s courageous leaders and citizens can end apartheid in Israel, allowing for the best peaceful solution – true democracy and equality for all. 

****

(Thank you Astro Awani @ YouTube)

Advertisements

Pacific Island Nation Kiribati Fights Global Climate Change.

English: Anote Tong
English: Anote Tong (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Posted October 2, 2013

by Jerry Alatalo

Given the debate on climate change, the following speech delivered before the United Nations by President Anote Tong of Kiribati, an island nation east of Australia in the Central Pacific, settles the issue.

****

REPUBLIC OF KIRIBATI

STATEMENT BY HIS EXCELLENCY (PRESIDENT) ANOTE TONG

 UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY

25 SEPTEMBER 2013

Mr President; Excellencies; The Secretary-General, Distinguished delegates; Ladies and gentlemen.

I bring to you all warm greetings from the people of Kiribati, on whose behalf I am privileged to once again address this august body.

Mr President,

I echo the sentiments conveyed by previous speakers in congratulating you on assuming the Presidency of the 68th session of this General Assembly. We are indeed very proud to have a fellow brother from the Small Island Developing States presiding over this session. I am confident that under your able stewardship, our organisation will continue its work towards improving the security and quality of life for all members of our global community, in particular those who are most vulnerable. Let me also take this opportunity to acknowledge with appreciation the commendable leadership of your predecessor, His Excellency Mr Vuk Jeremic.

Mr President,

I also commend the untiring commitment and work of our Secretary-General, Mr Ban Ki-moon who has served as an able navigator of our ship, steering the United Nations through the diverse and complex realities and the myriad of challenges facing our peoples and nations. The people of my country and of our region reiterate our deep gratitude for his personal commitment to the issue of climate change and the plight of the most vulnerable. Our people still remember, with fondness, the Secretary-General’s visit to Kiribati in 2011, particularly significant as it was the first visit to our country and to our region by the head of the United Nations. I am also heartened and humbled to hear that his visit brought home for him the stark realities of the challenges facing our people, living as they are on the front line of the climate challenge.

Mr. President,

The challenges facing us as we gather again in New York for this session are perhaps greater than when we did a year ago. Security challenges posed by climate change, conflicts, terrorism, transnational organised crime and others continue to undermine our efforts as a global family to achieve sustainable development, peace and security for our global community. In the past few weeks, we’ve seen heart-breaking events unfolding here in the United States, in Syria, in Pakistan, in Kenya and in other parts of the world, giving evidence of the growing security threats to our peoples from within our own societies. We share and join in prayer with the families of all those affected by these barbaric and terrorist acts.

Mr President,

The ongoing work of the United Nations and for us at this session reflects these challenges and you have appropriately selected the theme “Post-2015 Development Agenda: Setting the Stage” for our discussions this week. Kiribati welcomes this theme. It provides an opportunity for us to reflect on what we have done and achieved as individuals, as leaders of our countries, and together as a global body entrusted with securing a more peaceful, secure and better world for our people. We must ask ourselves if what we are doing is in the best interests of our people, or of just a select few. We must look at our efforts as leaders of this global family, and ask ourselves if we are doing the right thing for our children and their children, whose future is in our hands

Climate Change

Mr President,

This is the eighth time I have had the honour to address this Assembly in my ten years as President. On each occasion, I have sought to convey the same message. On each occasion, I have spoken of the real and existential threat to my nation. On each occasion, I have called for urgent action to address climate change and sea level rise to ensure the long-term survival of countries like mine. I said last year that I will continue to speak of the peril faced by my country for as long as I have breath in my body

Well, I‘m still breathing, and the peril remains.

This is a critical issue for the survival of our people and indeed for all of humanity. Many of you here today are parents, or even grandparents. My wife and I have been blessed with 10 grandchildren. Surely the world that we want to leave to our grandchildren should be a better one than what we inherited. But we are not on course to achieve this. In fact, we are disastrously off course. The scientists tell us that calamity awaits, and not just for those of us on low-lying islands. What we are experiencing now on these low-lying atolls is an early warning of what will happen further down the line. No one will be spared. We cannot continue to abuse our planet in this way. For the future we want for our children and grandchildren, we need leadership. We need commitment. And we need action…. NOW

When we all return home to our children, and grandchildren we must be able to look them in the eye and tell them with confidence that we have done all that is humanly possible to combat the devastating consequences of climate change.

Mr President,

We are grateful to the General Assembly for acknowledging climate change as a matter warranting the attention of the Security Council. And I applaud the commitment of our Secretary-General to this specific security threat, and particularly welcome his recent announcement to convene a High Level Summit on Climate Change next year, the most significant opportunity since the 2009 conference in Copenhagen. But the Secretary-General needs the support of all nations to ensure that the action necessary to address climate change is taken. We must step up our national and collective efforts to mitigate global greenhouse gas emissions. We must urge major greenhouse gas emitters to do their part. We must also call with urgency on our development partners to assist in our efforts to deal with the impacts of climate change and sea level rise now being experienced in our countries, and in our efforts to prepare our people for an uncertain future.

Mr President,

The delivery of international adaptation finance and resources are taking much too long. We cannot continue to stand on the side-lines and wait for others to deliver. We are taking charge of our situation and moving forward with our mitigation and adaptation strategies. We have finalised a National Adaptation Framework and are now working directly with our partners on this. Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and the World Bank are working with us to implement our national adaptation priorities. While we are taking adaptation measures to ensure that Kiribati remains habitable for as long as possible, prudence demands that we prepare for the future of our people.  We are looking to improve the skills of our people to a level where they are able to compete for jobs in the international labour market. We want our people to have the option to migrate with dignity.

Sustainable Development

Mr President,

On the Millennium Development Goals, our situation has not changed that much since I last spoke before this august body. We are on track on some of the Goals but we continue to be off-track on most of them. This should not come as a surprise, as most of the limited resources we have continue to be directed from equally pressing priorities towards fighting the onslaught of the rising seas and storm surges and its impact on our water supplies, on our homes, livelihoods and public infrastructure. This is a costly exercise – one we cannot afford – but one that is necessary. We will continue to rely on the goodwill of our partners and members of our global family in this regard. As we prepare for the Third Global Conference on Small Island Developing States in Samoa in 2014, the special needs of the most vulnerable, low-lying small states, like Kiribati, the Marshall Islands, the Maldives and Tuvalu, need to be highlighted. For how can we meaningfully discuss sustainable development goals when a disproportionate amount of our time and scarce resources are focused on ensuring the survival of our people?

Oceans

Mr President,

The ocean is a double edged sword for us in Kiribati. Sea level rise threatens the very survival of our people. But the ocean is also an integral part of lives and provides daily sustenance for our people. It can and should be a ticket away from dependency on others. We are a nation of water. We own substantial fisheries resources. The annual total catch in our waters is valued at some 400 million dollars. Yet, as owners we get only about 8 % of this.

Mr President

Where is the equity and fairness in this? This must change. Our goal is to maximise returns from this resource and we have started on this with the establishment of our first fish processing plant through a public/private partnership. We invite our partners to join us in this endeavour. I am convinced that given the right support we can achieve sustainable development through utilising the available resources of our vast Exclusive Economic Zone. We believe that through this approach we can reduce our reliance on development assistance. I am convinced that we will even be able to do away with development assistance altogether, if we are provided with the support we need now to develop our capacity to harvest and process our own resources.

Mr President

The ocean is the next frontier in the pursuit of sustainable development. While we have failed to protect our land and atmospheric environments from our human demands we must make sure that the ocean does not meet with the same fate as that of the atmosphere and the land.

The Future We Want

Mr President,

In June last year we met in Rio de Janeiro to review our progress 20 years on from the 1992 Earth Summit. Unfortunately our track record in delivering on our undertakings has not been good. In fact, in many respects our environment is worse off today than it was over 21 years ago. We renewed our commitment in Rio to achieving the future we want. But we need to move beyond commitments to ACTION.

This future we want will require this organisation to restructure and realign itself to reflect realities of our time. A time in which new and emerging security threats and injustices such as climate change, climate variability, sea level rise and ocean acidification are challenging the international system of governance. A time in which the future survival of some nations is seriously in question. A time when all those countries with the ability to do so must contribute to the prevention of this calamity or be forever judged by history.

“Business as usual” can no longer be considered to be part of the way forward. Let us not limit ourselves to working within the shackles and boundaries of our comfort zones. Let us be inclusive rather than exclusive. We must listen and allow civil society, our youth, women’s groups and those with the ability to assist and who have a contribution to make to join in the global dialogue and action to address these major challenges. In this regard we welcome the continued resolve of our Secretary General and yours Mr President to accelerate action on the reform of our organisation and to ensure highest level of global collaboration, accountability, decisive action and instillation of a greater sense of urgency on issues of critical concern to our global family.

Mr President

We also welcome the inclusion of Taiwan in international processes of the World Health Assembly and hope that this similar inclusive approach will prevail in respect of other international institutions and processes where Taiwan and all can participate and contribute meaningfully for the good of humanity.

Mr President,

The Future We Want calls for a frank assessment of our global decision making structure. It requires bold but rational political commitment on a global scale. As leaders of our global family, we must be brutally honest in accepting the reality that unless we act now on the future we want for our children and their children’s children, the prospects for success are bleak.

Conclusion

As we chart the path and set the stage towards a future we want, we must address the fundamental threats to the security and very existence of the members of this family of nations. Once again I call on all of us to ask ourselves the question “Whose interests are we pursuing? Are we here to secure the future of each other’s children or just our own?”

This is the greatest moral challenge facing all of us today.

Thank you.

Historic Syria Debate: Whole World Watching.

079 Capitol Hill United States Congress 1993
079 Capitol Hill United States Congress 1993 (Photo credit: David Holt London)

Posted September 4, 2013

by Jerry Alatalo

Following the history-making debate in the British Parliament, where the representatives of the people of that country voted down a resolution which would have Britain conduct military action on Syria, the United States Congress is in the middle of the same debate.

The whole world is watching now, whether through CSPAN broadcasts of the debates on the floor of the United States Congress or through the thousands of televised news reports, radio interviews and blog sites, fueling millions of everyday discussions.

A meeting and debate in the United Nations on the crisis in Syria should be held as soon as possible, with worldwide broadcast of the proceedings. The magnitude of possible consequences for humanity is too high to conduct debate on television, or in countries whose populations are a fraction of the world’s. What the world is watching now is a situation which affects the entire human race-every Ambassador from every member country of the United Nations absolutely must be allowed to express their questions, concerns and proposals.

The following video shows a CNN interview of Bashar Ja’afari, Syrian Ambassador to the United Nations.

****

The Truth About Syria Must Be Told.

Greater Middle East
Greater Middle East (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Posted August 25, 2013

by Jerry Alatalo

After visiting numerous blogs and reading many articles on the heart-wrenching situation in the country of Syria, I have come to believe that high-level televised talks have to be held at the United Nations. And as soon as humanly possible.

The reason such talks have to be held is that the people of the world are sharply divided on the tragic scenario in Syria. The reason people have differing views is because very few, if any, reports are being given to people that has the type of in-depth analysis people need to determine accurately what is occurring, and why. Depending on which reports people are reading and listening to, and they are all well-written no matter which “side” of the Syrian issue articulated, this is what they come to accept as true.

On the one hand there are those who believe that the recent chemical attacks, tragically resulting in the deaths of hundreds of men, women and children, are no doubt the work of the Syrian government and President Bashir Al-Assad. On the other hand there are those who believe that the rebel mercenaries, those fighting to topple the Al-Assad government were responsible, and that it was a “false flag” operation to allow the United States and western allies to escalate, to begin firing cruise missiles into Damascus.

This writer gets the sense that reports have been written by men and women from a standpoint absent any drilling down into real analysis of the causes for the Syrian civil war and increasing tensions; it is causeless, it is just the way it is. I have asked the following question in comments sections at a good number of blogs: “what is the reason for the warring and killing in Syria?” and have yet to receive any reply, much less any form of analysis.

In the following talk by economic, geopolitical researcher and author William Engdahl, he points out that Syria has allegedly reached an agreement with Iraq and Iran for a pipeline to transport natural gas, from Iran through Iraq to Syria, for shipment at Syrian ports on the Mediterranean. He mentions the “Leviathan” gas field, an enormous gas field in Israeli territory which Israel has begun to tap into.

Is this the reason for the warring and killing in Syria, and the west/east involvement: natural gas?

Or is the warring and killing in Syria because of the competition that privately controlled central banks in the west are receiving from the newly established, so-called BRICS financial organization, with Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa the original member states? A documentary by radio talk show host Michael Rivero titled “All Wars Are Banker Wars” could allow one to point to BRICS as the main reason which has led to the warring.

Is the warring and killing because of the rise of the BRICS nations’ competition against historical monetary control by private central bank cartels?

I have no wish to take sides on the Syrian war issue. Believe it or not I believe there are no “sides” for the human race-we are all one-whether we are conscious of it or not. The posting of this talk by William Engdahl was done because it was one I came across that at least delved in an analytic way into the situation, the big picture so to speak, of the Middle East region, including Syria. If any of you have similar sources of information which can give people more understanding of the forces at play in Syria, please mention them in the comments section.

Please do all you can to find and express the truth about the situation in Syria. The stakes are too high, there are too many negative consequences possible in this already horrific situation, for any man or woman to sit on the sidelines. Do not fear to propose spiritual solutions when speaking or writing about Syria. Do not fear to propose any and all solutions when speaking or writing about Syria. Now is the time for all good people to push as hard as humanly possible to prevent any escalation of war and violence in Syria, and all countries around this Earth.

Humanity needs to know exactly, and specifically, why there is war and killing in the country of Syria. Humanity must know the truth so that there is no doubt about what actions must be taken, where necessary. The truth has to be known by humanity in order that the wisest, most positive actions be taken, which ends the violence and suffering in Syria and the Middle East.

Take any and all action on Syria with the view that men, women and children who happened to somehow be born in that country are fellow brothers and sisters in the one family of man. Truly feel that relationship as brothers and sisters. What would you do if your mother or father, your brother or sister, your son or daughter were in Syria? This is the vision which all people on this Earth must hold now, and act as it is the true reality.

I state once again that there is an urgent need for high-level, televised talks with representatives from every country involved, every country concerned about this dangerous situation in the Middle East region. If that is every one of the 193 member states of the United Nations, so be it.

****