‘Incontrovertible’ Demands Real Investigation Of 9/11.

By Jerry Alatalo

“Simply put, this is not just the best film I’ve seen on 9/11, it’s the best film I have seen all year.”

– SERGEANT JOHN MEADERS, 32-year California law enforcement officer

aaa-20Perhaps the above quote about the powerful documentary “Incontrovertible” from Sgt. Meaders would be more accurate if the word “best” hooked up with the words “most important”. Filmmaker Tony Rooke’s brilliant, creative production will hopefully open enough eyes to how necessary it is for a real investigation into September 11, 2001 for it to finally happen.

Men and women around the world who’ve gained awareness that the “official” 9/11 Commission Report is nothing more than a whitewash of what really happened on that major-consequence day already know how frustrating are attempts to convince enough people and force an investigation to answer unresolved questions. Some of those men and women have come to the point where they’ve simply given up, where it seems like an impossibility to ever get to the truth.

While the endless frustration leading to the choice of dropping the matter and giving up the battle for truth becoming revealed is certainly understandable, the fact of the matter is that 9/11 represents the major unsolved war crime of this generation – possibly of any generation in world history. Is that a wild over-exaggeration? Watch “Incontrovertible” and odds are one answers in the negative, and comes to an understanding that there are – at this moment – very likely major war criminals walking freely on this Earth. The main issue is that these criminals need to become stopped.

“The essence of lying is in deception, not in words; a lie may be told in silence, by equivocation, by the accent on a syllable, by a glance of the eye attaching a peculiar significance to a sentence; but all of these kinds of lies are worse and baser by many degrees than a lie plainly worded.”

– JOHN RUSKIN (1819-1900) British writer

More than fourteen years have passed, repeated and serious efforts to force an investigation by men and women with impeccable credentials have been unsuccessful, annual gatherings of concerned people calling for the truth have experienced consistently smaller numbers as September 11 recedes further into history, yet, despite those disappointing time-related developments, the fact remains that unaltered questions remain unanswered, without urgent, necessary legal attention.

While Tony Rooke made “Incontrovertible” with an intended target audience of current and former members of the world’s military forces, police agencies and firefighting departments, the messages presented are surely of profound interest to every human being – in particular those who have an interest in building a more peaceful global civilization for themselves, their children and grandchildren – for all people, all children and future generations.

Watching the documentary is strongly recommended, along with making the film’s existence known to as many others as possible, especially men and women members of the military (former and current), law enforcement officers (retired and serving), and persons in the field of firefighting. Viewers of the film will understand that action is clearly necessary and find the best ways to move forward.

Will this superlative film “tip the scales” and make the critical difference? Is it within the realm of possibility that a real investigation of September 11, 2001 will finally occur and the truth becomes revealed? Mr. Tony Rooke and the people who appeared in or in any way contributed to “Incontrovertible” clearly believe the answer is “yes”, otherwise they wouldn’t have taken the actions leading to the film’s completion.

“And one may say boldly that no man has a right perception of any truth who has not been reacted on by it so as to be ready to be its martyr.”

– RALPH WALDO EMERSON (1803-1882) American philosopher

Purchase a DVD or Blu-Ray DVD of “Incontrovertible” at:

www.incontrovertible911evidence.co.uk

(Thank you to 911familymember at YouTube)

Advertisements

Would Ending Private Control Of Money Creation Improve Everything?

Posted on December 3, 2014

by Jerry Alatalo

aaa-14Alphabet According to Ken O’Keefe and a growing number of men and women around the Earth, the answer is yes. Mr. O’Keefe, at The 2nd International Conference of Independent Thinkers in Tehran a few weeks ago, said that taking the massive power held now in the United States, Europe and many other nations by a very small number of private, extremely wealthy individuals and transferring that power to the people in the form of a monetary public utility would change everything on Earth – for the better – in a day.

The United States government issues 3% of the money supply in the form of coins. The remaining 97%, in the form of paper currency, becomes created by private interests through the Federal Reserve system and privately owned banks – out of thin air, by typing some numbers into a computer screen. Quite simply, such a profoundly large power in the control of a very small number of ultra-wealthy global élite must end before there is any chance whatsoever to successfully defeat centuries-old problems faced by humanity like starvation, wars, homelessness, disease, environmental degradation, wealth inequality, species extinction and more.

In a recent post we shared a video of British MP Michael Meacher speaking during a historic debate on just this issue – monetary reform – inside the British Parliament, including pro-monetary reform speeches made by both conservative and liberal MPs. Just as governments in Sweden, Britain, Ireland, Spain – and now France – have made strong statements recognizing a Palestinian state recently, the world is evolving in such an accelerated manner that monetary reform will soon become just as publicized as the people of the world rapidly grow in awareness of what is really happening, and take the actions which lead to corrections of unjust, immoral, extremely harmful events and conditions.

Let us be thankful that the world’s people are acting to finally correct the decades-long injustice experienced by the Palestinian people. Give thanks as well that men and women in every nation and region are finally acting to correct the way money has historically become created – at least since 1913 and establishment of the Federal Reserve banking system in the United States – under private control, which has been a massive societal failure responsible for the tragic cycles of global economic booms and busts – and every war.

****

(Thank you to Ken O’Keefe at YouTube)

Global ISIS Debate Intensifies.

Posted on September 22, 2014

by Jerry Alatalo

OKEEFENarratives are stories of events. President Barack Obama says the world is threatened. Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif says, “We were not convinced that the United States government was serious. I’m sure that what happened yesterday in the House and the Senate approving the request of President Obama for financing the Syrian opposition does not correspond well with an attempt to fight terrorism. You do not fight terrorism by weakening the central (Syria) government”. Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister says the United States is “playing with the ISIL in Iraq, and turning a blind eye to the terrorist group’s operations in Syria”.

Syria’s Ambassador to the United Nations Bashar Ja’afari told the Security Council, in a reference to Saudi Arabia and Qatar, that “some participants in the coalition themselves helped create ISIL”.

Does anyone feel the need for some serious gun control legislation for the Middle East. Perhaps people would lose their employment at the corporations who build the weapons which are now in the Middle East, but the situation seems to have gotten out of hand. Some are suggesting harsh sanctions on nations like Saudi Arabia and Qatar and others who have financed the terrorist groups in Syria over the past three years, including weapons, supplies, training and pay. There have been similar calls for sanctions against Jordan and Turkey, where mercenaries such as those now in ISIS received their training.

With so many narratives/stories now becoming published about ISIS/ISIL/IS, perhaps the first step in eliminating the threat they pose is a truth commission for arriving at the true causes behind the rise of the ISIS. Once the factors become identified, actions can then be taken to eliminate those factors, then ISIS will begin to rapidly and steadily diminish in power until at a certain point the group is no longer a threat to people in Iraq, Syria, and the Middle East.

Television programs like “The Debate” may, in the eyes of some, represent a form of “minor” truth commission, while others will see the program produced by Iranian network Press TV as a kind of state-owned propaganda organ. However men and women hold their opinions of “The Debate”, every now and again it produces some memorable moments like the episode/debate to follow between peace activist Ken O’Keefe and former US intelligence officer Bob Ayers.

The show’s focus is on America’s division of terrorists into “good” and “bad”, and whether the US’ main goal is overthrowing Bashar al-Assad’s government in Syria. The title for the show is “Dubious Mission” and the guests begin their discussion after the woman host asks, “does the US really want to stop ISIS?”

Bob Ayers: I think that the United States wants to stop ISIL, but I don’t think the United States is willing to take the steps necessary to actually defeat and get rid of ISIL.

Ken O’Keefe: Absolutely not. And I find it laughable that anybody would ever consider the United States to be seriously interested in ending terrorism. We’ve had over 13 years of this farcical war on terror, all of it built on lies. From the false flag of 9/11, to the non-prosecution of Osama Bin Laden because the FBI admitted there was no evidence linking him to 9/11, from every policy sense… The invasion and occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq, the attack on Libya destroying that country, attempting to fully destroy Syria – all of this is terrorism. Terrorism on a grand scale.

Host: … killings and beheadings going on for years now in Syria, why is the United States acting now?

Bob Ayers: I think there are several triggers that caused the United States to react in this current timeframe. One trigger was the continuing success of ISIL in terms of expanding its territorial acquisition, and (2), the extension of, if you will, beheadings and things like that, to include United States citizens. That always triggers the United States. So, the United States is reacting to events that have caused them to sit up and take notice of ISIL.

Ken O’Keefe: … the beheadings have largely been debunked. At the very least, the people who are being executed in those videos are not alive. We know when you execute somebody by cutting off their head, their heart is still beating, blood will pour forth profusely. This is not the case with these videos, and it also is one massive manipulation to suggest that the life of one or two Americans somehow justifies yet another invasion and occupation, which we have destroyed three countries at the very minimum – in terms of Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya.

We have largely caused the breeding grounds for so-called terrorism all around the region. It is beggar’s belief that anyone would be manipulated in yet another policy in which invasion, bombing, and occupation, ultimately destruction of entire areas, is somehow going to make the world a better place. We have seen this all before, and the United States is repeating the same role as it has been. And it will make for more blood and more guts and more misery, and ultimately a breeding ground for those who see the West for what it is. Absolutely hypocritical.

The West has no moral authority whatsoever; it is in no position at all to discuss any issue regarding morality. Because it is the most corrupt and most violent of all peoples on this planet. The West is the problem, not the rest of the world. And our little boogeyman we create will stop once we stop having the power through the global reserve currency of the US dollar, to be able to pay those psychopaths to run around and behead, and so on and so forth.

Host: … actual goal the government in Damascus?

Bob Ayers: Certainly that’s the opinion of some people. The purpose of this debate tonight is to try to understand why the United States is acting the way they are, and what the steps are that they plan on taking to try to defeat, degrade, or destroy ISIS. It’s not a venue for standing on a soapbox and preaching against all the perceived ills and crimes of the United States over the last 50 years.

Host: … Syria is obviously in this scenario.

Bob Ayers: There’s no question that Syria is involved in this current situation. The United States position is that they have been trying to unseat Assad. Now, the United States is in an interesting position in that to defeat ISIS or ISIL, they’re going to have to defeat them not only in Iraq where they’re located, but also in Syria. If they defeat them in Syria, they are inadvertently supporting Assad, because Assad is fighting ISIL in Syria.

Host: … they don’t want to defeat them there (Syria)?

Bob Ayers: No. What I’m saying is, they want to defeat them there, but they don’t know how to do that without bolstering the Assad regime, which is something they don’t want to do. So the United States is resorting to these consortia, which they’re trying to find alternative ways, and alternative sources to defeat ISIL, without the United States doing it themselves.

Host: What kind of precedent does this set?

Ken O’Keefe: Well, it’s not a precedent at all. We’ve already been bombing Pakistan, Yemen; we have been running around the world basically in a lawless kind of way, have been carrying out policies including executions of anyone, anywhere, anytime, based on the so-called President of the United States having a meeting and declaring somebody to be a terrorist. This even includes American citizens. So, there is no sovereignty of nations. There is no international law.

And this so-called intelligence analyst. This intelligence analyst appears to be completely oblivious to the fact that it was the United States which supported the mujahideen, which became al-Qaeda, which morphed into al-Nusra Front, then ISIS, ISIL, IS, whatever the hell you want to call it. Has been arming these people, training these people, providing bases and training in Jordan and also in Turkey. Their little proxies of Saudi Arabia and Qatar and Kuwait have been funneling money and arms, and now we’re being told they’re going to be training these so-called moderate factions of resistance in Syria in Saudi Arabia, that bastion of moderate behavior, the Saudi Arabia regime, one of the most offensive – if not the most offensive – regimes on the planet.

A place that we give weapons and we give cover to, political or media cover. The idea that an intelligence analyst could be so oblivious, and so completely incompetent at his own field that he does not recognize the United States having supported, armed, trained, coddled, and protected all those terrorists for decades now, is beyond belief. He can’t be so stupid surely, not to know that the United States has an inherent interest in propping up continuously one boogeyman after another to justify what I said earlier: the military-industrial-complex, the goal of full spectrum dominance, military bases all around the world. This is what’s happened. People with half a brain know this.

Bob Ayers: I can’t continue to be insulted by this other person. I’m ending this interview. Find somebody else who’ll listen to this moron speak his mind.

Ken O’Keefe: You insult the people of the world with your so-called intelligence analysis. You are sending the American sons and daughters off to yet another war, so that they can become so traumatized, and so sick and so maimed that they can come back home to the tune of 22 American sailors and servicemen a day committing suicide. You are a traitor to your nation, or criminally incompetent.

At this point Mr. Ayers has ended his internet connection and his participation in the discussion. The host apologizes to the viewing audience and Ken O’Keefe is the lone guest. A few of his statements from the rest of the program worth noting:

“But at the end of the day, I come from the West, and what we can see is that my birth nation in the United States is the #1 terrorist. This is simply not debatable. And so I understand that many people are still being conned into believing in this nonsense – the latest boogeyman creation – but ever-growing numbers of people are not buying it. They are not. And this is extremely promising, and a necessary step to create a better world”.

“…The policy is being carried out exactly as it was written, and the scenes of sectarian hatred and divide, which are necessary to fracture the people of the region so that you’ll be in a weakened state and therefore be subject to the real intention and the goal, which is to expand the Israeli empire. Ultimately, this is going to fall flat on its face, but right now the chaos that is being sown is extremely advantageous for the powers that be”.

****

(Thank you to Ken O’Keefe at YouTube)

Critical Mass: Toward A Peaceful, Just, Sustainable, Sane World.

Listening To The Sound of Peace Under The Sunset
Listening To The Sound of Peace Under The Sunset (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Posted December 15, 2013

by Jerry Alatalo

Are the men, women, and children living on this Earth all members of one human family? When one thinks about the question one enters into the perennial, essential area of thought which makes all the difference in shaping reality in the world. Without going into the millions of theories proposed by men and women through history about the true meaning of life and existence, the fact remains that every single person has come to live and co-exist in this generation.

Humanity has evolved through the centuries of many paradigm shifts and changes in ways of living, generations living and dying – contributing in all ways to the circumstances passed on to the next generation – and creating the paradigms for the young ones to live in. What is the type of world we pass on to the next generations going to be? Does humanity have a choice in the matter? Yes, it is up to the human race to create the world in ways that would benefit those who inherit the Earth.

Every day more people around the world are coming to understand that a better world is within reach. What is going to become the difference, what is going to offer the requisite catalyst for taking actions which result in a better world, is a sufficient number of people – a critical mass – to know for a fact that we are all brothers and sisters on this Earth. There is a perception that the world is composed of single nations with names, and that these created boundaries called nations are somehow not related.

Perhaps a more accurate perception is that each person is a member of not a synthetic creation called a nation, but a member of the human family – the one human family. And that understanding is what leads to the ongoing and rapidly increasing intensity of evolution happening now around the Earth. And because of this profound evolutionary leap by mankind there will come soon a point of decision – between God and money. My belief is that humanity will choose the Creator/God over money, and bring about a situation on Earth where historical problems – war, greed, starvation, homelessness, harm, hate, etc. – will become dealt with and eliminated, once and for all time.

Love of money is the head of the snake that will soon be challenged worldwide and defeated. The love of money, where people serve themselves and not their brothers and sisters in the family of man, finds its greatest example in the world of international banking cartels, where financial organizations’ major emphasis is profiting at the expense of persons and governments of all sizes. Debt-based monetary systems have produced inestimable hardships for the world’s people for centuries, and people are now thinking there are better ways – ways which place the health and well-being of all at the forefront.

Monetary reforms which remove the predatory nature of interest, a monetary system which includes public banking at national levels in countries around the world, would allow for a dramatic increase in standards of living across the planet. It would create true democracy or all, not just the select few who control international finance today. There will be profound increases in egalitarianism, social equality, brotherhood, peace, and justice on Earth.

At present the world’s nations and people face debt which can never be repaid, all because the financial cartels have said “you can’t have your own national banks, you have to borrow at interest from us.” Those at the top rung of these money monopolies show no concern for their brothers and sisters around the world, the essential motivating force is profits derived from the people and natural resources of the planet. In their minds if this calls for indebtedness of governments to the point of austerity, overthrowing democratically elected leaders through assassinations or coups, or outright mass murder in the form of wars of aggression, then these people have historically taken those actions.

****

This is a form of insanity that the people of the world are simply tired of experiencing. The insanity is fully concentrated in its most extreme measure in the privately owned central banks of the world. It is the world’s “head of the snake” as many have come to call it, including Ken O’Keefe – the man interviewed in the following video – which perpetuates the status-quo, insane nature of living on Earth. It is a system which shows itself as not the best way forward – where domination and control of nations and people becomes practiced instead of coöperation and brotherhood between the world’s people.

Ken O’Keefe hosts a weekly program about the Middle East on the internet at The People’s Voice TV. He can also be found on YouTube at his Ken O’Keefe channel.

Change begins with the realization that all men, women, and children on this Earth are brothers and sisters in the family of man.

****

Related articles