Economic Crisis’ Cause: Screwiness Or Criminogenics?

English: Brooksley Born
English: Brooksley Born (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Posted October 23, 2013

by Jerry Alatalo

“Money, money, money, monnn-ney… MON-ey.”  So goes the song by the Motown musical group The O’Jays, “For The Love of Money”, which came to the radios in the 70’s. To be honest, there are times when one wishes money were never created. Can’t Public Banking become implemented now as the new monetary system and replace the old debt-based, private-controlled central banking model? Well, they say patience is a virtue.

In this post we will find a large contrast in views between former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan and Law and Economics Professor William K. Black of the University of Kansas City-Missouri. The very obvious contrast points to, in my mind, an intentional effort by those at the highest levels of management at the Federal Reserve to obfuscate or confuse the people.

In the first video (thanks to Kevin @ YouTube) we find Alan Greenspan on October 22 Daily Show with Jon Stewart. Mr. Greenspan”s book “The Map and the Territory” just came out, and he talks with Stewart about “what went wrong” in the events leading up to the 2008 economic crisis. In my opinion Greenspan speaks in a vague, hazy kind of way filled with generalizations.

The first few minutes before Alan Greenspan walks on are about glitches/problems with internet enrollment in the so-called Obamacare program, good for a few laughs.

Mr. Greenspan says “we” didn’t see it coming-that we thought banks would be better stewards of their capital, that they (the bankers) didn’t understand the risks out there. He goes on to say that markets do “weird” things, and that people are sometimes a little “screwy”. He said that we always thought that the “screwiness” would wash out. First, can the former Chairman of the Federal Reserve be any more vague and non-specific than, in effect, blaming the worldwide economic crisis on “screwiness”?

He goes on to “identify” the problem: in 1970 the New York Stock Exchange made some change that allowed broker/dealers to incorporate, which led to risk-taking that would not have occurred if the partnership arrangements were kept as the majority of brokers and dealers’ relationships-equity would have been protected. Mr. Greenspan suggests the easiest thing to do is increase capital requirements because, when banks fail it “rumbles through the system”.

He goes on to say “that those of us who look at that sort of “stuff” (totally lacking specificity) recognize…” He sums it up by saying that if there is enough regulatory capital, “then they can do a lot of things which you shouldn’t be able to…which you shouldn’t worry about.” I am still trying to determine if, when he said “shouldn’t be able to” and “which you shouldn’t worry about”, this was a sort of gaffe. Did Mr. Greenspan start that sentence and almost say “which you shouldn’t be able to do”, thereby admitting that fraud and criminality will continue even with increased capital requirements, his idea of an easy fix? Has retirement dulled his ability to obfuscate and confuse on his feet, where before he never had to stop in mid-sentence and correct himself?

Mr. Greenspan mentions zero, nada, zilch about the frauds and corruption, or his dealings with Brooksley Born, head of the federal regulatory agency overseeing derivatives, and her very urgent call to regulate the multi-trillion dollar, unregulated derivatives trading transactions-which were a major factor in the economic crisis-and which Born’s suggested regulation Greenspan, Larry Summers and others fought and blocked. Find the essential, astonishing Frontline episode “The Warning” which reports on Brooksley Born and her unsuccessful battle to regulate derivatives trading.

Alan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke are “Wizard of Oz” characters, the men behind the black curtain, who have used smoke and mirrors, obscuration, confusing, overly complex economic blather, and banking jargon as they are high-paid managers for the ultra-rich owners of the Federal Reserve Bank.  Ivory Tower economists who don’t mention the “downsizing” and “workforce reductions” which led to millions of American jobs sent to Mexico and China for low-wage workers. They are Ivory Tower economists who assert that Americans aren’t working because “entitlement programs are too generous”, calling on governments around the world to begin “austerity measures” so that their bosses, the owners of privately owned central banks get paid the principal plus interest.

Contrast Alan Greenspan to Bill Black.

In 2011 Bill Black received an invitation to speak before Congress as part of a panel of experts on the issue of derivatives. He accepted the invitation. Shortly before the panel convened and was ready to speak to Congressmen, Mr Black was “disinvited” because, he was made aware in email communication, he was going to “bash banks”, be “confrontational”, and may “cause damage to the reputations of banks”.

Before this he had testified five times, before both Democrat and Republican committees, about fraud, banking and regulatory matters. He has over thirty years of experience in law, white-collar crimes and economics, and led the effort to convict around a thousand savings and loan executives in the bank crisis of the 1980’s. Mr. Black says that the 2008 crisis is the biggest in 75 years, the economies of America and Europe have suffered devastation, and nothing fundamental has changed.

Mr. Greenspan failed to note in his conversation with Jon Stewart, as Mr. Black does here, that millions of fraudulent “liars loans“, 40% of the mortgages made, were largely responsible for the crisis. Bill Black emphasizes that “liars loans” are fraud and they are crimes. Mr. Greenspan must have missed the “liars loans” meetings.

Mr. Black quotes Mr. Greenspan when he spoke to Brooksley Born about her push for the regulation of derivatives, “I don’t think there is any need for laws against fraud. The market will take care of itself”.

So, was the 2008 crisis caused by, as Alan Greenspan put it, “screwiness”, or as Bill Black sees it, “criminogenics”?


The Public Banking Solution. It Is Time.

English: Clockwise from top-left: Federal Rese...
English: Clockwise from top-left: Federal Reserve, Bank of England, European Central Bank, Bank of Canada (Note: Uploaded for use on Wikinews) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Posted October 12, 2013

by Jerry Alatalo

It is safe to say that a large percentage of the human race has an awareness, a feeling, that there is something wrong with the banking system on Earth. For most men and women reading these words there is a higher level of awareness about how money becomes created and who owns the world’s private central banks – Federal Reserve, European Central Bank (ECB), World Bank, International Monetary Fund (IMF), and Bank for International Settlements (BIS).

Just as in a small-town bank the wealthiest individuals and families in that town own it, the private central banks in those nations where they operate, in small and large countries, are owned by the wealthiest people on Earth-the “Big Town”. One has memory of Mr. Ross Perot’s famous line delivered in a 1992 presidential debate, not directed toward banks but toward the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), where he described  a “huge sucking sound” of jobs moving from America to Mexico and other countries where corporations have since set-up shop with employees working for much less money than Americans.

His “huge sucking sound” reference can easily apply to private central banking, where money has been circulating for centuries, with vacuüm cleaner efficiency, up from average citizens, and through the tube to the owners/stock-holders of those banks.

Everyone on Earth now knows what has occurred through history regarding this private central banking phenomena and realize that, like the Jack Nicholson movie, “Something’s Gotta Give”. In an earlier post I predicted that the Federal Reserve as we know it will end. Public banking is an idea whose time has come. Thanks to many men and women around the world, including Ellen Brown in this interview, founder and president of the Public Banking Institute, people are now moving and taking the necessary actions to create public banks.

There are more than twenty states in America which are initiating action to set up state-owned public banks along the lines of the state-owned Bank of North Dakota.

In this interview Ellen Brown stressed the absolute importance of citizens’ becoming fully informed about the public banking solution. She points out that it is essential for as many men and women as possible to have a full and complete knowledge of banking before they can advocate and bring public banks into reality. There is a lot of misunderstanding and ignorance about banking. An excellent place to learn about public banking are at Ellen Brown’s very good websites. Here are two of them:

The Bank of North Dakota is the sole repository of the state’s deposits and revenues. It is a huge deposit and asset base which returns the profits to the bank/people instead of seeing those profits going to Wall Street. Ms. Brown mentions that 40% of banks around the world are state-owned public institutions. She then mentions the BRICS financial alliance (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) which represents 40% of the population on Earth.

Germany has public banks in some of their cities and counties which facilitate loans at low-interest for local businesses and for infrastructure projects. What is important to note is that public banking has no speculative transactions like Wall Street, where reckless gambling on derivatives, interest rate swaps, and other complex transactions, with customer deposits, led to multi-billion dollar losses which the American taxpayers bailed out. Wall Street operators made huge, risky bets using their customer’s money to earn profits for themselves.

It is casino gambling which has led to hundreds of trillions of dollars in derivatives trading. Bank of America and Chase have upward of 70-80 trillion dollars worth of derivatives on their books. Ms. Brown describes the “shadow banking system”, the wild-west aspect of finance, where operators routinely gamble recklessly with billions of dollars of bets, and super-priority claims of derivatives in bankruptcy cases such as is the current situation in Detroit.

She notes that it is time for a new banking system which will allow none of the massive fraud and corruption which led to the financial crisis of 2008, continuing to this day.

With the next inevitable burst of the financial bubble-since the beginning of the Federal Reserve System in 1913 the boom and bust cycle has marched on relentlessly-the situation will find the nation in a place where there is 25 billion dollars in the FDIC, and the Dodd-Frank provisions by law allow no government bail-out(s). At that point the bankrupt banks will turn to “bail-ins”-the banks will take depositor money to re-capitalize themselves.

Public banking is the solution.


Related articles