enowned legal expert/attorney, professor and author Daniel Sheehan was one of the keynote speakers in New York City over the weekend (September 10-11) at the Justice In Focus 9/11 symposium. Mr. Sheehan shared details of major historic American cases he’d participated in and/or led, to provide relevant examples of difficulties and challenges the men and women pushing any effort to prosecute the potential criminals responsible for 9/11 will run up against.
From facing aggressive criticism by corporate media, to politically appointed judges who will block efforts for 9/11 justice, to probable near-endless resources available to individuals named as defendants, men and women lawyers on any team working for justice after 15 years will need their legal plans, tactics, and details in proper order – their legal “ducks in a row”.
A legal effort to prosecute individuals responsible for the crimes of 9/11 represents a higher level of seriousness than normal petty political crimes, and another category of scandal or crime involving national politics/government. The extremely rare events of 9/11 are criminal offenses for which existing legal institutions were never designed to handle.
To help illustrate the extraordinary legal nature and seriousness of the crimes committed on 9/11, Mr. Sheehan shares the words of President Jimmy Carter administration official Gary Sick, where Sick, referring to the Iran-Contra scandal, quotes a French poet: “..(crimes) so grave that they cause the very foundation of the law itself to tremble.”
Mr. Sheehan shared more words written by Gary Sick: “We know what to do with someone caught appropriating funds, but when confronted with evidence of a systematic attempt to undermine the very democratic political system itself, we all recoil in a general failure of nerve.”
In what was a very informative, revealing and forceful talk, Daniel Sheehan ended by telling men and women seriously considering lawsuits against the planners of 9/11 that, once begun: “..they better not stop, better not delay, but must be ready to go all the way with this.”
He also pointed out any 9/11 case would end up in front of the U.S. Supreme Court, making clear potential legal actions involve extremely high-level litigation, a heightened level of scrutiny, more attempts by judges to dismiss, and the necessity to “cross every ‘T’ and dot every ‘I’ .”
More people are becoming aware of the individuals and/or groups behind the 9/11 attacks as the U.S. “Deep State”. Of the remaining candidates in the 2016 presidential election, only Dr. Jill Stein and Ajamu Baraka of the Green Party have called for a new, independent investigation of 9/11.
Gary Null of the Progressive Radio Network posted a 15-year commemorative, 6-hour compilation of 9/11 interviews, including a talk with Daniel Sheehan. Other experts on various aspects of 9/11 interviewed by Mr. Null include:
Barbara Honeger, Former White House Policy analyst, founding member of Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth
Richard Gage, Founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
James Fetzer, Professor emeritus of the Philosophy of Science University of Minnesota, founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth
Graeme MacQueen, Retired professor of Comparative Religion at McMaster University in Ontario, co-editor of the peer-reviewed Journal of 9/11 Studies
Scott Bennett, Federal whistle-blower, author of “Shell Game”, former U.S. Army Special Operations officer specializing in terrorist financing
David Chandler, Retired physics teacher and board member of Scientists for 9/11 Truth
Lee Jamieson, Organizer of 9/11 Truth symposiums and founder of HR14.org
Consider Gary Null’s compilation of interviews a 6-hour audio book on the events of September 11, 2001. Thank you, Gary Null.
re those men and women who hold that the attacks on 9/11 (September 11, 2001) were not as the official government 9/11 Commission Report described so-called “conspiracy theorists”, to remain completely ignored, or powerful warriors for the truth? That is the question. Given many who’ve questioned the official version of events are very well-educated, serious men and women, how important for humanity is getting to the bottom of , seriously addressing, concerns the thousands have written and spoke to?
For the sake of argument, let us presume the concerns are legitimate, based on completely sincere, sometimes exhaustive efforts of research and investigation. It seems clear that, in many instances, men and women have indeed been guided by high moral standards in their search for the truth, leading most people to agreement that a new, thorough, all-inclusive investigation simply must become undertaken.
The negative consequences of not pursuing the truth about 9/11 could logically be compared to ignoring symptoms of cancer in an individual human being, except that not getting to the truth about 9/11 ignores a global form of cancer, eating away at confidence displayed by people the world over on integrity at the highest levels of government. Given much less public expenditure went to financing the activities conducted by the 9/11 Commission than to the Clinton/Lewinsky sex-between-two-consenting-adults scandal, and that there are many men and women who have actively called for a real investigation and announced their willingness to present their exhaustive research findings, the amount of taxpayer money needed for getting to the truth, letting the chips fall where they will, is next to zero.
If there is any expense to the taxpayer, it consists of allowing very well-educated, serious men and women to, freely, convey what they have found and believe actual, disturbing differences between the official 9/11 Commission Report and the facts they have discovered. Common sense is enough, along with the globally persistent, cancerous, trust-destroying consequences of failing to adequately address serious concerns about a historic, world-changing event, to conclude further investigation is warranted.
The events of September 11, 2001 were simply far, far too important for humanity to ignore, risking continuing severe and negative consequences for the international community. The clear moral choice is fearlessly and honorably agreeing to making efforts which reveal the truth…
September 11, 2001. The events of 9/11, where the World Trade Center towers and Building 7 were taken down, were manipulated to wage two wars and the expenditure of trillions of dollars. The amount of people around the globe killed and seriously wounded, the destroying of societies, and the amount of suffering by humanity in the events following 9/11 have been devastating.
Given the many important, unanswered questions regarding the accuracy of the official 9/11 Commission Report, there is an absolute need for a new, independent from the government, examination. For example, that building 7 of the World Trade Center complex, which was not hit by any plane and had but a few office fires, totally collapsed like a controlled demolition into its own footprint and was not even mentioned in the report.
Building 7 for many is a form of smoking gun that points to there being another story than that painted by the commission. As building 7 was not even mentioned in the report there is an even greater concern leading to the calls for a new investigation.
Many organizations have come out to demand such a new investigation, and there must be one, to allow every person with a legitimate concern or question to get their message on record. Given the example of the false flag incident of the Gulf of Tonkin which started the Vietnam War, there can be no allowance of doubt from the people of the world that every shred of evidence was thoroughly examined before closing any books on 9/11.
Senator James Fulbright of Arkansas said the following about the Gulf of Tonkin incident: “Biggest mistake of my career to accept the story from the military that was false.”
What happened to building 7 is among many other unanswered questions which simply have to be heard, noted and addressed.
What really happened at the Pentagon that day?
What does the chemistry of the dust found at the Twin Towers tell us?
What are the thoughts of controlled demolition experts?
What was the true extent of insider trading right before September 11?
What about the hundreds of police, firefighters and other people who heard explosions before and after the planes hit?
What about the sub-basement explosions that were heard?
Why was every window blown out of the north tower?
Why were fighter jets given a stand down order and not scrambled immediately?
Why do experienced pilots think the hijackers could not have performed the maneuvers?
Why do 2,000 architects and engineers support a new investigation?
What about “rivers” of molten metal seen by firefighters?
How did the towers fall in 10 seconds when physics says it should have been 40 seconds?
Why was there no pile of rubble from buildings that were 1,500 feet tall?
How did buildings that weighed 500,000 tons each dematerialize and turn to dust?
How did 1,000 cars up to one half mile away become toasted without any contact with the buildings?
Why was only one filing cabinet out of 50,000 found after the collapse?
Was Donald Rumsfeld’s testimony of September 10 that 2 trillion dollars of the Pentagon budget was missing and unaccounted for of any importance, or related to, the events of September 11?
Why was Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, on the grounds of the Pentagon helping with rescue when the threat was still there for more attacks?
How could the most well guarded building in the world, the Pentagon, not be protected from an attack by airplane? How did this airplane break the intense security of the Pentagon?
There are many, many more unanswered questions. Questions which were never answered by the official 9/11 Commission.
The official story of 9/11 has become accepted by most people because they do not want to rock the boat or suffer ridicule as a “conspiracy theorist”. For many this poses a risk of job and family security which is too high to take. Those in the universities run the risk of jeopardizing their employment and grant monies anytime they upset or oppose the activities of those who supply the monies. University professors face risks for speaking truth on other important issues besides 9/11.
People give up any thought of determining the truth of what happened on 9/11 and you hear them, as they shrug their shoulders say, “nobody knows what happened” or “we’ll never know what really happened”.
We return to our analogy of the alcoholic who must make the required effort and take the required actions to end his or her denial in order for his or her healing to begin. With regard to the truth about September 11, 2001 most Americans are in denial. The denial must end.
There are those who have clarified complex issues surrounding 9/11 to the point where a new, independent commission has to be undertaken. This event from the past has to be thoroughly understood in order for humanity to understand the present and positively shape the future. Many proud and patriotic Americans have devoted tremendous amounts of time and effort investigating this event for over twelve years, and the issue has to be resolved. This is a gaping international wound that simply has to be healed.
When a new commission identifies previously unknown perpetrators and profiteers, they have to be brought to justice, arrested and prosecuted for crimes against humanity. War criminals cannot be allowed to roam free and not answer for their crimes.
The beginning of the healing of humanity would happen after a one-hundred percent complete re-examination of the events on that day, with absolutely no omissions of legitimate inquiry. If this required the filming of 200 hours of testimony by credible concerned citizens-400 hours-the cost would be minimal and the truth of what actually happened will be uncovered. This is an action which has to be taken in order for humanity to heal. Any concerns or questions still in the minds of citizens about what actually took place on that world-changing day have to be addressed and answered to eliminate any incorrect information that is moving about in society.
The correcting of errors in people’s beliefs and theories about what happened that day has to be undertaken, because the continued existence of any such unreal perceptions allows the festering of negative thoughts which are poisoning the waters of culture. Public trust in the institutions of society could be renewed-while more importantly, finding the truth would be experienced as the all-important aspect of life that it is.
Facing the truth about 9/11 would allow humanity to make gigantic strides toward renewal of societies which consider telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth as sacrosanct. Sacrosanct is defined as extremely sacred or holy; inviolable. Inviolable means must not or cannot be violated, criticized or tampered with.
The greatest positive results of such an effort would be a profound increase in the number of people on Earth who would decide to practice complete honesty and tell the truth in their lives. This would lead to a profound increase in the amount of honest, truthful information that circles the planet-where subsequent decisions made by humans would be much more inclined to allow for the healing of all.
Those questions and concerns which have not been addressed about the events of 9/11 are giant thorns in the side of humanity. These thorns would be removed with a new, thorough, complete investigation without any omission-where the only concern is arriving at the truth.
As we come upon the July 4 holiday, perhaps looking back at the events of September 11, 2001 may not be on your list of things to do. Many have spent much time researching, going down the “rabbit hole”, to try to find out what really happened that day.
Personally I believe that there needs to be a new investigation into what happened that day. As the official 9/11 Commission Report does not even MENTION Building 7, the “smoking gun” that many point to as evidence of an inside job, one can only believe that the report was a whitewash.
A new investigation which answers each and every question and concern must be undertaken to arrive at the truth. I am doing this short post to point you to the work of Dr. Judy Wood. Her book “Where Did The Towers Go?” uses science to show that the Twin Towers turned to dust. Her presentations are fascinating to watch and her theory and the evidence she has produced is being censored by the mainstream media.
In this short YouTube video you will hear Alex Jones fail to answer the caller’s request, or question, to interview Dr. Judy Wood. He talks about there being no screens of calls, he talks about Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, but what he does not give one word’s worth of time to is Dr. Judy Wood’s theory or evidence.
Alex Jones is one of the largest personalities in the alternative news world. For him to obfuscate and evade the caller here is, in my mind, clear evidence that he has been compromised in some way regarding Dr. Judy Wood and her evidence of what happened on September 11, 2001.
After that you will find an over two hour presentation by Dr. Judy Wood. Please share your thoughts on September 11, 2001. Thank you.
Palestinians are at the heart of the conflict in the M.E Palestinians uprooted by force of arms.. Yet faced immense difficulties have survived, kept alive their history and culture, passed keys of family homes in occupied Palestine from one generation to the next.
This blog is devoted to legal, historical and human rights matters, in which issues of general concern are addressed freely and spontaneously. It is intended to further an informal exchange of views in the democratic spirit of freedom of opinion and respect for the opinions of others, in an effort to understand rather than condemn, to propose constructive solutions rather than grandstand. The perspective is both from inside and outside the box and the added value lies more in the questions than in the answers.