“Frankenskies”: New Film Raises Big Questions On Climate Engineering.

By Jerry Alatalo

n 1962 United States President Lyndon Johnson in a commencement address at Southwest Texas State University talked to graduates about “..controlling the weather”, and “..controlling the world”. Just to what extent the U.S. military has advanced since 1962 in the area of weather warfare is unknown except by those in the military working directly in the alleged programs.

Learning the truth will require men and women willing to take the same severe personal risks as Daniel Ellsberg (Vietnam War), Julian Assange (government/corporate crimes), Edward Snowden (government surveillance), Chelsea Manning (Iraq War crimes), John Kiriakou (illegal torture), Scott Bennett (terrorist financing), Brad Birkenfeld (banking corruption), and others determined to speak the truth.

Mr. Matt Landman directed the film “Frankenskies” about the history, development, and facts concerning the phenomenon termed climate engineering, geoengineering, and other various scientific designations. His choice to balance the amount of time in the film to information from both “sides” of the debate over weather control was a good one, adding seriousness and weight to the effort. The final effort, 120-minute film production’s quality is excellent, and a superb example for others to follow in comparison to other small-budget, independently made documentaries.

The topic of weather control technologies, for researchers, is one which can lead one down some very deep, multi-directional, even sometimes strange rabbit holes. Thankfully – and wisely, in light of its very controversial subject – Mr. Landman keeps the film’s focus inside the boundaries of logical, academic and/or scientific reasoning. The result is a very strong film message viewers will find close to impossible to ignore or forget.

Many people will immediately react to mention of weather control with labels of “conspiracy theory”, but they might experience an extreme change of perspective and attitude after watching “Frankenskies”.  They surely will come away with facts and details they’ve never seen mentioned or reported by the corporate media, but for “conditioning”, surprising reports – such as the 12 new cloud formations (or species of clouds) added institutionally recently. The film’s information has neither been transparently shared by government and/or military officials but for recent revelations – again, described in the film as a form of societal “conditioning” for what’s ahead.

What inclines one to lean toward the explanation that weather modification is essentially a tool for war? …The unanimous unwillingness by elected representatives in the U.S. Congress in responding to concerns expressed by large numbers of their constituents on the matter. Add to that government avoidance of historical facts presented in Mr. Landman’s film, and the logical conclusion to arrive at is that nations and high-level military/intelligence officials have been using weather control technology since the 1950’s as a weapon of war.

“Frankenskies” has already, just hours after posting, begun going viral on the internet. The question now becomes one of gathering sufficient momentum, creating a state of affairs making impossible continued government dismissal of legitimate concerns, and leading to where honorable action brings about open public meetings exposing the truth of the matter.


To  those appreciative of his work and wishing to send financial support to Matt Landman for making his next film “Frankenskies II”, please visit:


(Thank you to Matt Landman at YouTube)


Climate Change Deniers Support Geoengineering To Stop Climate Change.

Geoengineering: how to solve climate change?
Geoengineering: how to solve climate change? (Photo credit: explainthatstuff)

Posted December 4, 2013

by Jerry Alatalo

Here’s an interesting question. “Why are U.S. Congressmen and Senators silent on geoengineering?” There are a large number of men and women in the United States House of Representatives and Senate who claim that climate change or global warming is a hoax. In other words, these men and women elected politicians believe there is no such thing as climate change. So, let’s see if we can make some sense of this owned belief and the practice of geoengineering, which is being carried out to stop or reduce global temperatures’ rising.

Well, there is no way to make any sense of the lack of outrage about unnecessary expenditures on geoengineering coming from those climate change-denying men and women politicians.

Through the years we hear about awards going to particularly outrageous spending by the United States government. Like spending $250,000 on studying the mating habits of some odd type of insect, or $400,000,000 on a highway that goes miles into an uninhabited forest only to end in a cul-de-sac, or $1.77 million on a statue of Santa Claus in Florida, etc.

You get my drift.

For some odd reason, there have been no media plastered Washington, D.C. political speeches of outrage on the “wasteful spending on geoengineering, which is stopping a climate change problem that does not even exist!” You would think that the climate change deniers in Congress would be all over the issue of taxpayer money being wasted on spraying metals from planes going on all across America. I have yet to become aware of the amount of taxpayer money that is being spent on geoengineering, but the outrage coming from the climate change deniers is easily tabulated on the accountant’s calculator – zero.

Why is there total silence coming from the climate change deniers?  Because the geoengineering option maintains their status-quo.

Geoengineering (weather modification to combat climate change) has been allowed to continue without a peep of protest from the climate change deniers because nothing then has to change. Big gas, oil, coal, and nuclear corporations and their owners can conduct business as usual. The enormous political, financial, and market power remains where it has always been – no need to fuss with carbon taxes and fees, lifestyle changes, increased production of renewable energies supplied free from the sun and wind, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and best of all, the American taxpayers foot the geoengineering bill.

The silence becomes simple to understand now.

So, we find massive amounts of aluminum, barium, strontium, silver oxides, fluoride and God only knows what else being dropped from planes, into the atmosphere to stop the sun’s rays from reaching the Earth. In effect the decision was made, without the knowledge and consent of American citizens, to massively pollute the Earth’s environment, including all humans, animals, and plants. Drive those SUV’s to the gas station, fill them up, and ride. Nothing to worry about. This technology is taking care of it.

With regard to geoengineering, humanity needs a major-league timeout.

Firstly, geoengineering is a giant experiment, with both known and unknown consequences. How many of you are aware that 193 nations signed on to a United Nations Biological Diversity agreement banning geoengineering? And that the United States was one of three nations which declined to sign the agreement? The situation is one where nations which want to conduct huge geoengineering experiments do not need any consent from the United Nations.

It is time for scientists to come forward and tell the truth about the science behind weather modification experiments. At this point there are scientists suffering from arrogance and hubris in geoengineering marriage with equally arrogant and hubristic billionaire owners of fossil fuels corporations. For a small handful of people to play god, while risking the health and well-being of all living things on Earth in the process, is not right. Humanity simply must collectively demand an end to geoengineering.

So, the situation now is one where the choice has been made to use technology, from the same people who caused the climate crisis in the first place, instead of making the hard choice to change the amounts of fossil fuels that become consumed on Earth. Just allow a few people to adjust the planetary thermostat, while keeping things like they were, without regard for the tremendous damage being done to all life forms.

If the experiments don’t work simply enlarge them. Instead of 50,000 square kilometers/miles, run the “experiment” over 500,000 square kilometer/miles. Pound the surface of the oceans with iron nanoparticles so algae can consume the Earth’s carbon dioxide and sink to the oceans’ floors. This is ocean fertilization, one the proposed options for fighting greenhouse gases. Another proposal calls for “artificial volcanoes”, where sulfurs are distributed up giant pipes into the atmosphere to block the sun’s rays from the Earth.

All these options, actually being considered by national governments around the world, would not require any changes for fossil fuels industries, are the cheapest options (paid by taxpayers), proposed by the same people who caused the crisis in the first place, who ask humanity to “trust us to fix this now”. Go back to watching the ball games and reality shows, we’ve got this all taken care of.

The United Nations General Assembly has to be given the power to vote on the continuance or curtailment of geoengineering actions. There needs to be a debate at the UN on this issue as soon as possible, with the representative of each member nation given a say on the matter. Geoengineering technologies are dangerous because no scientist or politician can predict the outcome(s) from their use. How does the human race know, once this technology has become accepted, when national leaders will use it for military or selfish political reasons?

In the following video, a man well-known by all who have done any research on geoengineering, Dane Wigington, talks with Russ Tanner, in a film made by John Massaria. Thanks to Lewey7777 @ YouTube. Mr. Wigington makes the point that geoengineering is destroying the Earth’s ozone layer, resulting in a powerful system of feed-back loops where continued spraying destroys more of the ozone layer, leading to more Arctic ice melts, leading to less of the sun’s heat being reflected away from the planet, increasing the sun’s heating of the Earth’s oceans, and occurring again and again. This process, according to Dane Wigington, will continue with horrific consequences, the worst being the release of tremendous levels of methane now frozen on polar ocean floors.

He is giving humanity the direst warning possible. Whether the human race will understand soon enough and end all forms of geoengineering, allowing the Earth to heal in ways that are of nature – we shall see.

For more information, please visit:



Related articles

Geoengineering And Worldwide Righteous Indignation.

Vermeende 'chemtrails' nabij Schiphol Purporte...
Vermeende ‘chemtrails’ nabij Schiphol Purported ‘chemtrails’ near Schiphol Airport, The Netherlands (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Posted December 3, 2013

by Jerry Alatalo

Many of you may have done a small or large amount of research into what has come to be called geoengineering. I was aware of the phenomena to a small extent, and had not planned on delving into the issue until what I saw a few days ago. Now, keep in mind that I am in an area on Lake Superior in Michigan, USA that is very (and I mean very) sparsely populated. The largest “city” in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan may approach 30,000, and I am many miles away from that city.

A few days ago I jumped in the car on an errand, and I looked up, on a clear sunny day, to see what has come to be termed a “chemtrail”, or a long cloud-like formation coming from what was probably a B-52 or similar aircraft. I didn’t see any aircraft, told myself that I am seeing my first geoengineering product called a chemtrail, and drove on to my destination. When I got to the store I looked up to check out the chemtrail and the B-52 (or whatever large plane it was) was directly overhead laying down another chemtrail, from east to west.

I asked the cashiers inside if they had ever heard of chemtrails and they both said no, they didn’t know what that was. I don’t have a phone which takes pictures, and regret not asking any of the other shoppers if they could take a picture of the plane spraying directly overhead, and email it to me. So, I jumped back on the highway to the next destination. After a few miles I pulled off to the shoulder and got out to simply look at these contrails, directly overhead and clearly visible.

Those of you who are familiar with the geoengineering phenomena know the difference between a contrail and a chemtrail. A contrail is the exhaust from a plane that quickly dissipates, while a chemtrail is the exhaust from large planes that does not dissipate, and remains like a long cloud for a long period, stretching for what seems like miles. It was as I mentioned a sunny day, and there was no wind – the chemtrail was clearly visible right above me. It stretched for miles and I could see the metal particulates as if they were “misting” off/down from the entire length of the formation.

From the information I came across since that day there were probably a number of metals in that formation, including aluminum, barium, and strontium. These are the metals most often mentioned in articles about geoengineering, although there can be anywhere up to 50 ingredients in these airborne creations, including fluoride. Now, I had to wonder what was going on for these chemtrails to become sprayed out here “in the sticks” where I’m at.

It has made me somewhat upset, to the point where I want to contact someone to learn what was occurring that day, and what was in the sprayed trails that I saw. I want to know everything about those trails I saw plain as day, including what was in them, why they became sprayed in the sky, and who authorized the spraying.

The video here of the documentary on geoengineering, “Why In The World Are They Spraying?”, raises some very disturbing issues surrounding the practice, which evidently is today being carried out all over the Earth. Geoengineering is one of those issues, like genetically modified organisms (GMOs), public banking, etc., which rarely, if ever, are the subjects of reporting on the mainstream media outlets.

I define anger and righteous indignation differently. Anger is a useless emotion which results in nothing but negative consequences like stress, loss of friendships, and good relations with one’s family members, men and women in the work environment, or acquaintances. Righteous indignation constitutes a warranted anger which comes upon one when coming into contact with persons or events that are plainly out of line and wrong.

Those geoengineering trails I saw in the sky have put me in a state of righteous indignation.

If you have any information, whether from personal experience, or if you know someone who has given you the truth about what geoengineering is and why it is occurring, please let everyone reading this know what you know. The documentary delves into some very immoral reasons for the practice, including another Wall Street gambling derivative invented by those at the disgraced Enron Corporation, which allows people to make millions, or billions, of dollars through betting on the weather.

The woman organic farmer makes the point that Monsanto “conveniently” has developed genetically modified crops that are aluminum and drought resistant – while Bill Gates is “coincidentally” heavily invested in Monsanto and a strong geoengineering advocate. Now, the last thing I want to do is go down the rabbit hole of “chemtrail conspiracy theory”, but, somebody in the United States government, preferably Barack Obama, needs to adequately address the concerns that I, as well as a rapidly growing number of American citizens (as well as citizens in nations around the Earth), have about geoengineering.

Is it too much to ask that political leaders address these concerns? The videos I’ve seen on YouTube about geoengineering, including this important documentary, have thousands and thousands of views, so people are definitely interested and concerned about this. When there are people warning about the negative consequences of continuing this practice of geoengineering – very, very negative consequences – the least congressmen and senators can do is address this issue and answer the citizens’ legitimate questions.

The makers of “Why In The World Are They Spraying?” have pointed to some highly controversial motives for the geoengineering practice of spraying many tons of metals all over the world. Other people have pointed to even more sinister theories of motives, which I will not specify here, as they stretch the imagination to areas that are truly disgusting. Let me just say that the theory of the motivating factor being corporate profits would not surprise whatsoever. All I can do is emphasize the point that whoever is running the geoengineering programs on this Earth, whoever is giving the OK to do this, needs to answer humanity’s questions and address their concerns in a forthright, honest way – now.

If you don’t have time to view “Why In The World Are They Spraying?” by Michael Murphy, please give yourself a reminder to view it soon.

For more information visit geoengineeringwatch.org.

Related articles