China Reacts To Stoltenberg Threat: NATO’s Hands Stained With Blood, Is Threat To Global Security

The disappointing and concerning seeming inability of powerful nations to agree on positive actions to reduce tensions, and in the process help prevent unnecessary tragic violence, suggests humanity has a considerable ways to go before achieving maximum spiritual evolution….


Global Times
March 16, 2022

Unreasonable, sinister for NATO to push China to condemn Russia

The Ukraine crisis was largely triggered by NATO’s aggressive eastward expansion. The bloc is the culprit. Instead of reflecting on itself, NATO piles pressure on other countries to stand with it against Russia. This is unreasonable and quite sinister.

“China should join the rest of the world in condemning strongly the brutal invasion of Ukraine by Russia,” NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said on Tuesday, “The Russian invasion of Ukraine is a blatant violation of international law so we call on [China] to clearly condemn the invasion and of course not support Russia. And we are closely monitoring any signs of support from China to Russia.”

NATO is a puppet of the US, a Cold War military bloc manipulated by the US. The obsolete military organization has launched many ruthless military aggressions and triggered corresponding…

View original post 412 more words

4 thoughts on “China Reacts To Stoltenberg Threat: NATO’s Hands Stained With Blood, Is Threat To Global Security

  1. A timely historical review by Elle Reynolds, reminding us that the media have long been the greatest liars and warmongers. Blood is … their bread and butter. [Their famous motto is, “if it bleeds, it leads”] Excerpt, a timeless quote from George Orwell, who fought in the Spanish Civil War:

    “I saw great battles reported where there had been no
    fighting, and complete silence where hundreds of men had
    been killed. I saw troops who had fought bravely
    denounced as cowards and traitors, and others who had
    never seen a shot fired hailed as heroes of imaginary
    victories; and I saw newspapers in London retailing
    these lies and eager intellectuals building emotional
    superstructures over events that never happened”, he
    recalled. “I saw, in fact, history being written not in
    terms of what happened but of what ought to have
    happened according to various ‘party lines'”

    We cannot believe either side: both are experts at propaganda. The “Fog of War” is upon us.

    Worse for the US, much worse for the EU and all mankind, are the calls for war with Russia from Washington demagogues.

    Both sides depend on an enemy: “Beware a person who makes his living fighting an enemy, for they have a vested interest in keeping that enemy alive.” which is why there will be no nuclear war.


    1. Hey, Jimmy..

      Member of Congress (R – Florida) Ms. Salazar says Russia forced the United States into “their trap”, while Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano asserts Russia fell into a trap set by NATO, and then Professor Francis Boyle says Russia fell into a U.S. war plan.. Who’s accurate?..

      We find Archbishop Vigano’s 24-page writing the most accurate description of the current reality on Earth. You may already have read it, but we’ll post the link (below) for those who have not yet read his powerful “Declaration on the Russia-Ukraine Crisis”.. Thanks for the input as always Jimmy.. Take good care. Peace.

      Liked by 1 person


        Rappoport reveals the Nietzsches conncection between Russia and the US political, war
        and terrorism industries: Antony Sutton (1925-2002), labored for many years to unearth US-Russian collusion at the highest levels. That’s why Sutton was censored by mainstream news and academic institutions. The Best Enemy Money Can Buy (1986), and his three-volume classic, Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development, published between 1968 and 1973, exposed the deep historic relationship between US and Russian power players.


        1. With all due respect to Mr. Rappoport, his is the theory generally-known as “They are all in on it”, which – to be completely honest – is far from the current reality, threatening to place Rappoport in the category of irrelevant conspiracy purveyor.. While the historic relationship between US and Russian power players is interesting in that it shows the universal commonality of greedsters/gangsters, it has nothing to offer of relevance today. To suggest “they’re all in on it” in light of what’s now occurring borders on the ridiculous..


Sober & mature comments are always encouraged. Thank you!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.