ong time attorney Dr. Reiner Fuellmich posted a 49-minute talk on COVID-19 recently which went viral across the internet, and where Dr. Fuellmich described the global COVID-19 phenomenon as “Crimes Against Humanity”, and “The greatest fraud in human history”.
The video received approximately 1.5 million views on YouTube after around a week, then for some mysterious reason was taken down from Dr. Fuellmich’s channel, and thus disappeared (verb) from YouTube altogether..
For that reason, – and because we feel the legal work being conducted by attorney Fuellmich along with a rapidly growing number of men and women attorney associates worldwide is so important – we are sharing an hour-long interview/discussion with Reiner Fuellmich with a Swedish radio host, published shortly after the previous viral video suffered banishment from YouTube..
Here is a comment on the video contributed by a viewer which explains the foundation of the class action case being brought by Reiner Fuellmich and his team of fellow attorneys: the severely inadequate and near completely erroneous COVID-19 PCR Test:
Dr. Yeadon makes these major conclusions: 1. We are closer now to the end of the pandemic than to its middle. 2. Ninety percent of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests in the United Kingdom are false positives. 3. The PCR test is fundamentally flawed and should no longer be used. This is from the second part in tandem with part one, “How many Covid diagnoses are false positives?” (The Manila Times, Oct. 3, 2020), which featured the article of professor Carl Henaghan, director of Oxford’s Center for Evidence-based Medicine. In part two, I will feature a follow-up article by Dr. Michael Yeadon, who first broke the news about false positives. He was chief science officer for 16 years of Pfizer and is co-founder of Ziarco Pharma Ltd.] I quote below key excerpts from Dr. Yeadon’s article:
“I am semi-retired from a career in the pharmaceutical industry and biotech, where I spent over 30 years trying to solve problems of disease understanding and seek new treatments for allergic and inflammatory disorders of lung and skin. I’ve always been interested in problem solving, so when anything biological comes along, my attention is drawn to it. “In 2020 came SARS-CoV-2. I’ve written about the pandemic as objectively as I could. The scientific method never leaves a person who trained and worked as a professional scientist.
“I found it remarkable that, in discussing the Covid-19- related deaths, most people I spoke to had no idea of large numbers. Asked approximately how many people a year die in the UK in the ordinary course of events, each a personal tragedy, they usually didn’t know. I had to inform them it is around 620,000, sometimes less if we had a mild winter, sometimes quite a bit higher if we had a severe flu season.
“This article is about the testing we do with something called PCR, an amplification technique, better known to biologists as a research tool used in our labs, when trying to unpick mechanisms of disease. I was frankly astonished to realize they’re sometimes used in population screening for diseases — astonished because it is a very exacting technique, prone to invisible errors and it’s quite a tall order to get reliable information out of it, especially because of the prodigious amounts of amplification involved in attempting to pick up a strand of viral genetic code. The test cannot distinguish between a living virus and a short strand of RNA from a virus which broke into pieces weeks or months ago. …
“I believe I have identified a serious, really a fatal flaw in the PCR test used in what is called by the UK government as the Pillar 2 screening — that is, testing many people out in their communities.
“What is the evidence? When the first (and I think, only) wave of Covid-19 hit the UK, I was with almost everyone else in being very afraid. I’m 60 and in reasonable health, but on learning that I had about a 1 percent additional risk of perishing if I caught the virus, I discovered I was far from ready to go. So, I wasn’t surprised or angry when the first lockdown arrived. It must have been a very difficult thing to decide. However, before the first three-week period was over, I’d begun to develop an understanding of what was happening. The rate of infection, which has been calculated to have infected well over 100,000 new people every day around the peak, began to fall, and was declining before lockdown. Infection continued to spread out, at an ever-reducing rate and we saw this in the turning point of daily deaths, at a grim press conference each afternoon.
“We now know that lockdown made no difference at all to the spread of the virus.
“Some say that lockdown, directly and indirectly, killed as many as the virus. I mention this because interventions in all our lives should not be made lightly. It’s not only inconvenience, but real suffering, loss of livelihoods, friendships, anchors of huge importance to us all, that are severed by such acts. We need to be certain that the prize is worth the price.
“We supported the first lockdown, because we did not know what we faced, and frankly, almost everyone else did it, except Sweden. I am now resolutely against further interventions in what I have become convinced is a fruitless attempt to ‘control the virus.’ We are, in my opinion closer to the end of the pandemic in terms of deaths, than we are to its middle….
“Now we have learned some of the unusual characteristics of the new virus, better treatments (anti-inflammatory steroids, anti-coagulants and in particular, oxygen masks and not ventilators in the main), the ‘case fatality rate’ even for the most hard-hit individuals is far lower now than it was six months ago.
“I believe any second wave talk is pure speculation. Part of the ‘project fear’ that is rather too obvious, involving second waves, has been the daily count of ‘cases.’ It’s important to understand that, according to the infectious disease specialists I’ve spoken to, the word ‘case’ has to mean more than merely the presence of some foreign organism. It must present signs (things medics notice) and symptoms (things you notice). And in most so-called cases, those testing positive had no signs or symptoms of illness at all.
“Government decided to call a person a ‘case’ if their swab sample was positive for viral RNA, which is what is measured in PCR. A person’s sample can be positive if they have the virus, and so it should. They can also be positive if they’ve had the virus some weeks or months ago and recovered.
“But there’s a final setting in which a person can be positive and that’s a random process. This may have multiple causes, such as the amplification technique not being perfect and so amplifying the ‘bait’ sequences placed in with the sample, with the aim of marrying up with related SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA. There will be many other contributions to such positives. These are what are called false positives.
“Think of any diagnostic test a doctor might use on you. The ideal diagnostic test correctly confirms all who have the disease and never wrongly indicates that healthy people have the disease. There is no such test.
Misuse of power
“I’m focusing solely on the false positive rate in Pillar 2, because most people do not have the virus (recently around 1 in 1,000 people and earlier in summer it was around 1 in 2,000 people). It is when the amount of disease, its so-called prevalence, is low that any amount of a false positive rate can be a major problem.
“Because of the high false positive rate and the low prevalence, almost every positive test, a so-called case, identified by Pillar 2 since May of this year has been a false positive. Not just a few percent. Not a quarter or even a half of the positives are false, but around 90 percent of them….
“As of the most recent ONS survey, to a first approximation, the virus was found in 1 in every 1,000 people. This can also be written as 0.1 percent. So when 10,000 people are tested in Pillar 2, you’d expect 10 true positives to be found.
“So, what is the false positive rate of testing in Pillar 2? For months, this has been a concern. It appears that it isn’t known, even though as I’ve mentioned, you absolutely need to know it in order to work out whether the diagnostic test has any value!
“This test is fatally flawed and must immediately be withdrawn and never be used again in this setting unless shown to be fixed.
“The effect of the day by day climb in the number of people that are being described as ‘cases’ cannot be overstated. I know it is inducing fear, anxiety and concern for the possibility of new and unjustified restrictions, including lockdowns.
“There are very serious consequences arising from grotesque over-estimation of so-called cases in community testing… I have explained how a hopelessly performing diagnostic test has been, and continues to be used, not for diagnosis of disease but, it seems, solely to create fear.
“This misuse of power must cease.”
Here is the 60-minutes interview with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich. Please consider sharing widely. Thank you.