More G20 Awkward.

n contrast to the late (chopped to pieces) Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi, at least Yulia and Sergei Skripal are still alive. That is … IF they are still alive. The father and daughter haven’t been seen nor heard for over near 15 months since surviving what is (still) alleged by United Kingdom Prime Minister Theresa May as a Russia-sponsored “Novichok” nerve agent attack.

The extreme, persistent controversy of the Skripal affair, combined with continuing troubling questions about their health, well-being and … well, aliveness, not to mention their recounts of what they experienced that March 2018 day, unsurprisingly has led to another very awkward moment at the annual G20 meeting in Osaka, Japan.

Could Russia’s Vladimir Putin have just asked Britain’s Theresa May “Where are Yulia and Sergei Skripal?”? Inquiring minds want to know, and that is why men and women around the world have for some 15 months been demanding a straight answer to precisely that same, hugely-important question.

***ALERT: People knowing the whereabouts of Yulia and/or Sergei Skripal are being strongly advised to call 9/11 or their nearest law enforcement agency immediately. Officials emphasized their advisory is directed at politicians as well, and most especially United Kingdom Prime Minister Theresa May. 

*Sarcasm aside and in all seriousness …

Where the hell are Yulia and Sergei Skripal?

And so it goes – June/July 2019 on planet Earth. 

5 thoughts on “More G20 Awkward.

  1. You are obviously a Russian Troll to ask such a traitorous question. They were shown the Khashoggi tapes and told to shut up or join him (ok, be unjoined like him) [sarcasm – great post, Jerry]


    1. It seems people who ask questions in sincere search for the truth, or express, at least, their sincere perception of the truth (e.g. 9/11 was greatest false flag in world history – and similar minutiae, trivia, etc.!), they are labeled either a Russia-bot or anti-Semitic.. Another way of describing this current strange state of communications affairs on Earth is the term “Truthcrime”..Drives one crazy … er, crazier… 🙂


      1. On 911, I was with a tour group yesterday at the Vienna Opera House. A woman asked me why I was in Vienna so I told her about my car window being destroyed and physical attacks and the terrorists Penn and Teller telling people to throw me down the stairs. She asked me about what my problem with 911 was. So I told her about the exploding towers, the controlled demolition of building 7, and no plain parts or holes at the Pentagon. She immediately tells me she was an eye-witness. A few questions later she admits she was not the eyewitness, but someone she knows, and says she is going to go with the eyewitness. I point out that eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable. She responds that that is just for murder cases (this is the biggest murder case in recent history). She then walks off saying she is “going with the eye witness” account. I do a quick internet search and show my friend a picture of the Pentagon right after the explosions with no holes and no plane parts on the ground. The woman’s husband comes over and claims that is not a picture of the Pentagon after the explosions. I say, “Yes it is!” He walks off. Of course, they did not want to talk to me anymore.


        1. Jimmy,

          Of course 9/11 was a covert military-intelligence operation and criminal deception of historic proportion. Just for the sake of argument, let’s assume the unreal – that the official whitewash 9/11 Commission Report is accurate, blah, blah, blah.. There is still a powerful argument to be made for the Southern District of New York to move immediately and – after stalling for over 15 months – start the agreed upon (and mandatory by U.S. law) grand jury process to examine the massive evidence compiled by The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry. The argument?: Societal division over the 9/11 issue is now illustrated, according to reports, by over 50% of Americans NOT believing the whitewash 9/11 Commission narrative. That extremely high level of divisiveness across the United States regarding 9/11, with all the negative consequences including family, friends, co-worker arguments, lasting animosity, bar-room brawls, etc., is reason alone to allow the Lawyers’ Committee to move forward immediately.

          Had a similar incident regarding geoengineering the other day. With around (6) clear lengthy spraying lines running across the sky, I asked a fellow on the street while pointing directly overhead “Do you know what that is?”, whereupon he answered “A cloud.”, whereupon I tried to explain geoengineering to him. He seemed suddenly disinterested, and walked away. For people interested in the controversial topic, we stumbled across C-SPAN and Bill Richardson in February 2018 where Richardson, in “response” to a caller from New Mexico seeking his opinion on skies filled with spraying lines, said “I don’t know anything about that”, or in other words lying through his teeth. Richardson was the freaking Secretary of Energy, so it’s impossible for him not to have heard of geoengineering, even if he believes it’s a conspiracy theory. Richardson’s (honest) response should have been “It’s a conspiracy theory”, but the point is Richardson’s response for this observer who stumbled upon the C-SPAN segment arguably proves that weather is being used widely as a weapon of war. Iran has reportedly actually accused the United States publicly of weather warfare. Search C-SPAN’s website, search “Bill Richardson”, and view the February 2018 appearance – starting at the 19-minute mark. Richardson is dirty, no doubt. I provided the C-SPAN link in comments on YouTube videos by Dane Wigington, Jim Lee (2 of the more well known geoengineering activists), and many other places, but the Richardson lie for whatever reason hasn’t become disseminated. Ah well, better days ahead…



Comments are closed.