World Ban On Nuclear Weapons Closer To Reality.

*******

“A specter is haunting mankind. It is the specter of annihilation in a thermonuclear war.”

– ERIC HASS (1905-1980) American writer, editor

___

“Global war has become a Frankenstein’s monster, threatening to destroy both sides… It contains now only the germs of a double suicide.”

– DOUGLAS MacARTHUR (1880-1964) American general

___

“The power to destroy the world by the use of nuclear weapons is a power that cannot be used – we cannot accept the idea of such monstrous immorality… The time has now come for the nations of the world to submit to the just requisition of their conduct by international law.”

– LINUS PAULING (1901-1994) American scientist, Nobel Prize for Chemistry 1954, Nobel Peace Prize 1962

___

“If we are not able to prevent a third world war, we shall go down in history – as the guilty generation, the generation which did nothing to prevent the annihilation of mankind itself.”

– U THANT (1909-1974) Burmese Secretary General, United Nations

___

(Article by Jan Oberg – Originally posted at Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research … Thank you.)

On Mainstream Media Coverage of Nuclear War Risks and Nuclear Abolition

By Jan Oberg

TFF PressInfo # 421

June 30, 2017

ou’re probably an avid consumer of news and reports in one or more daily media – local, national or global. You want to be well-informed and say interesting things when you meet friends and colleagues.

And you certainly don’t want to find out that you’ve been taken for a ride by fake news, half-truths, bias or omissions by media that you trusted because you thought you could.

Now ask yourself whether you remember to have seen one or more of these essentially important initiatives and reports recently, all pertaining to nuclear weapons, the risk of nuclear war and advocacy of nuclear abolition:

1) That a large majority of UN members have drafted a treaty that shall declare nuclear weapons illegal, once and for all?
If not, go here and enlighten yourself on one of the most constructive and visionary initiatives in today’s otherwise gloomy world situation.

2) That a conference is taking place these very days about that goal and its process?
If not, go here.

3) That a scary new film shows why Americans should be very nervous about nuclear arsenals?
If not, go here.

4) That the Marshall Islands filed a lawsuit against all 9 nuclear weapons states for failing to comply with their international legal obligations?
If not, go here and see how the smallest actor of all took responsibility on behalf of 7 billion people.

5) That the Nuclear Crisis Group advocates – just a couple of days ago – that steps be taken urgently to de-escalate nuclear flash points such as NATO-Russia and North Korea?
It consists of predominantly former nuclear weapons commanders, ambassadors and scholars, mostly American.
If not, go herethis report has not been mentioned by one single mainstream/make-believe media!

6) That there is an open letter written to Trump and Putin, meeting in Hamburg soon, urging them to declare that a nuclear war can’t be won and must never be fought, and to cooperate on a series of other issues?
If not, go here – they are politicians, ministers and ambassadors from the US, Russia, Germany and England.

How many of these had you any knowledge about?

How prominently do you think they were featured if you saw them in the mainstream media – given their importance for the very survival of humankind?

If there were more than one or two you had never heard about, consider this:

They all involve NATO countries which possess the far majority of the world’s nuclear weapons. NATO is an alliance that is built on the right to use nuclear weapons.

There has never been a referendum about the desirability of nuclear weapons in any of the countries – also not those who call themselves democracies – that have acquired nuclear weapons. One must assume the reason to be that most normal citizens would not like to be “defended” by nuclear weapons.

It’s a tiny minority of countries, most of them NATO members who have nuclear arsenals. Many more countries have decided to never acquire nuclear weapons.

Let’s say that there are about 100 people in each of the nuclear countries who decide on whether or not to use nuclear weapons in a given situation – thus around 1000 people. It’s the largest concentration of power ever in human history – a God-like power to decide whether or not human beings worldwide shall continue to exist, or not.

In short, non-constituted, dictatorial and non-democratic. No one should be given the power to decide about the existence or destruction of 7 billion people. No political goal can justify it.

And finally ask yourself: Why do most of these so-called ‘leading’ media systematically ignore these issues today? Why is it that any sex scandal or details of the Cosby trial is more important? What should be our priorities?

Would it not be natural for them to provide public education and offer a fair hearing of the pros and contras of nuclear weapons and the whole mental and societal construction underlying these weapons – the nuclearism of our times?

Admittedly, I’ve got a nasty hunch: If citizens around the world were given free press balanced information instead of being kept in the dark, there would be a much stronger worldwide movement for the abolition of each and every nuclear device anywhere.

Further, thanks to humanity’s civilizational process these Evil weapons would be condemned and/or thrown on the heap of history as other evil constructs: slavery, cannibalism, absolute monarchy, dictatorships, child labour, pedophilia – and we would begin to question whether the exact same should not be done to non-nuclear weapons and wars too.

In the name of ethics, humanity, common sense and civilization. The US $ 100 billion which are spent annually on nuclear weapons systems alone could be allocated to alleviating human suffering.

Top editors of the ‘leading’ media look to what they believe would sell on the – shrinking – market. If they served humanity’s 7 billion instead of about 1000 masters of (nuclear) war they might well get more readers and sell more subscriptions and be seen by citizens as a force for the common good, not an integral part of MIMAC – the Military-Industrial-MEDIA-Academic Complex – that runs all these wars.

Yes, I know I’m just using the main argument of the Zeitgeist: the market and what will sell and yield a profit to shareholders.

If media people would think in terms of common sense, ethics and civil courage too and give us diverse, balanced and critical coverage of nuclear war risks, so much the better! Until then, bless the struggling independent truth-seeking media on the Internet!

Make-believe coverage of the feasibility or legitimacy of nuclear weapons and war as well as omissions of the nuclear facts of our daily lives contributes to increasing that very risk – the risk of the unthinkable: the end of humanity and the world as we know it.

***

Many others in the years since the first atomic bomb have shared Mr. Jan Oberg’s profound concerns over the potential use of nuclear weapons, and likewise called for their total abolition.

Among the men and women, holding varying positions which cross the spectrum, in “Good Thinking: Those Who’ve Tried to Halt Nuclear Weapons” – Anthony Donovan (3-hour, 38-minute documentary) are the following:

  • Sister Megan Rice
  • Eleanor Roosevelt
  • Karen Silkwood
  • Dorothy Day
  • John F. Kennedy
  • Jimmy Carter
  • Ronald Reagan
  • Mikhail Gorbachev
  • Linus Pauling
  • Albert Schweitzer
  • Paul Nitze
  • Michael Dukakis
  • George Bush
  • Dick Cheney
  • Jonathan Schell
  • Andrei Sakarov
  • Carl Sagan
  • Adlai Stevenson
  • Leo Tolstoy
  • Mahatma Gandhi
  • Grigoris Lambrakis
  • Pete Seeger
  • Pope John the 23rd
  • Thomas Merton
  • Martin Luther King Jr.
  • Veterans for Peace
  • John LaForge
  • Nelson Mandela

Historical events, situations and issues covered and discussed in the film include:

  • North Korea and nuclear weapons
  • Nuclear power and nuclear weapons
  • Nuclear weapons and the role of money
  • Taxes, military spending and nuclear weapons
  • United States Departments of Defense and Energy, nuclear weapons
  • Hiroshima and Nagasaki
  • Bomb shelters, air raids and nuclear weapons
  • The Continental Walk Against Nuclear Weapons
  • Sweden, shining example on nuclear weapons
  • United Nations conference to ban nuclear weapons
  • Terrorism and nuclear weapons
  • The nuclear corridor
  • United Nations, nuclear disarmament
  • The Golden Rule 1958
  • Deterrence, and the will to use nuclear weapons
  • Drones, warfare, nuclear weapons
  • Our veterans courage
  • We’ve been lucky
  • Nuclear weapons ban proclamations and Mayors for Peace
  • “Deterrence is obsolete, it will fail”
  • Wall Street profiteering, nuclear weapons
  • What do artists think about nuclear weapons?
  • How do our faiths inform us?
  • Precious Earth and animals
  • The women’s movement, nuclear weapons
  • Solar energy and nuclear weapons
  • Prestigious universities and nuclear weapons
  • Nevada test site, radiation
  • Within 5 minutes of blowing up the planet
  • What one nuclear detonation does
  • Engaged in magical thinking
  • A public health question
  • Verification delays progress – make them illegal

Humanity found the moral courage to create effective rules criminalizing biological and chemical weapons worldwide. Now is the time for humanity to rise with one voice and carry out determined collective actions powerful enough to accomplish the goal. Banish nuclear weapons from this Earth forever.

*******

Here is a segment from the documentary, focused on the multi-billion dollar nuclear weapons industry – the military-industrial complex warned about by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in his famous Farewell Address.

(Thank you to Good Thinking – The Documentary at YouTube)

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “World Ban On Nuclear Weapons Closer To Reality.

  1. Why do I get the feeling that the threat of nuclear war is itself a false flag? When I see the name of Ronald Reagan and George Bush posing as ambassadors of peace, my clockwork mechanism comes to a grinding halt. Nothing has profited the military-industrial, etc… complex more than the ever-present threat of nuclear war. It makes such wonderful headlines, and images of “small” nuclear bombs used on two cities in 1945 evoke such deep fear and revulsion – and how easy it has been to use “nuclear capability” as a reason to lie about and oppress those who did not make the nuclear club in time, or found themselves bereft of Big Brother support – the US, NATO, Russia, China, India…

    The point here isn’t the danger, but the ever-present threat of nuclear war. There is evidence that earth experienced the use of nuclear weapons in prehistory. Did such “man” (or whomever)-made disaster convince the Earthian numbties that war, not just a specific type of war, is a bad thing? Quite the contrary: Earthians are a war-loving, war-mongering, brain-defective species that never gets it. Meanwhile the most socio – and psycho – pathic types among them are constantly pushed and prodded onto the seats of power to make the decisions for the rest. (I could name names here, but it would be redundant – who doesn’t know this?)

    History tells us what that leads to. The more population pressure and resource penury manifest, the more wars there will be, and in my view, whether fought with clubs or nuclear weapons, the actual result is the same: the problem is man’s love of violence and war, not the types of weapons used. Wars are fought constantly, against women, against the poor, against minority races, against “wrong religion” believers, against the dispossessed, against the environment, fought with greed, fists, kicks, machetes, hand guns, legal trickery, poisonous chemicals, propaganda, promises, threats, smear campaigns. The threat of nuclear war is one of the false flags used to mask the real, daily, on-going violence. And that violence cannot be legally banned, or defeated by political correctness. Well, ’nuff said. Sorry about such a long comment.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Sha’Tara,
      No reason to apologize.. 🙂 One can see your point how nuclear threatening has a false flag aspect to it, with constant intentional overestimates of the “enemy” weapons spending/levels, and in that decades-long process (completely ignorant of Eisenhower’s prophetic Farewell Address warnings) results have been regular increases in government spending in the many billions of dollars. Considering the United States government appears to intend on spending $1,000,000,000,000 (one trillion dollars) over the next 30-years supposedly “improving” its nuclear weapons stockpile, people might start more fully appreciating – then, demanding – a global, international law, binding treaty making nuclear weapons of mass destruction illegal.

      After all, these absolutely horrific products are meant for one purpose only, and that is to kill massive numbers of human beings. Bottom line is nuclear weapons are good for nothing but death, and any man or woman who advocates for their continued existence is bat-shit crazy.

      Thanks for the comment. Peace.

      Like

  2. Thanks for the update, Jerry. Thus far, we have used our nuclear stockpiles like snarling dogs to deter the enemy. Problem is: When the leader of the world’s greatest nuclear arsenal is an individual who fights fire with fire – he can’t help it, it’s just the way he is, his aides tell us – and doesn’t appear to understand that missiles and MOABs are not alpha male toys, the likelihood of a nuclear war becomes a frightening possibility.

    Like

    1. Rosaliene,
      The U.S., Russia, China, Britain, France, India, Pakistan, North Korea and Israel along with the NATO countries oppose the nuclear treaty conference at the United Nations, nonetheless that well over 100 nations will pass an historic resolution moving the right direction towards nuclear abolition is very encouraging. Virtually no progress has come since the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty was established in the 1968-70 time frame, but the date July 7, 2017 (if correct on the day) when the vote takes place inside the United Nations likely will go down in the history books as a major, positive turning point for humanity.

      Given the concerns raised in your commentary the timing could be viewed as near perfect. It seems there is an urgent attempt by good men and women, now that Trump has taken off the mask, aimed at preventing or stopping whatever covert war moves/options the Trump administration certainly is planning.

      One theory of Trump’s 59 Tomahawk missile attack on Syria in early April is that he and Netanyahu knew the precise timing and location of Syria’s bombing of the terrorist compound in Idlib, they used the time gap between learning of it and the actual strike to arrange an “off the shelf” false flag attack carried out by the terrorists, then Trump ignored his intelligence experts and bombed the Syrian airbase – with the intention of drawing a military response from Syria/Russia to massively escalate into all-out war. Seymour Hersh by writing his expose on Trump might have saved the world.

      Thank you, Rosaliene. Peace.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

~Burning Woman~

This WordPress.com site is for thoughts from "the other side"

lara trace hentz

on fridays and breaking news

Dimitri Lascaris

"We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools" - Martin Luther King, Jr.

Noise

because the world needs another guy yammering on the interknots

Political Vel Craft

Veil Of Politics

Moving Forward

My Feelings About The World and What To Do Moving Forward

HUMAN WRONGS WATCH

By Baher Kamal & The Like

Fig Trees and Vineyards

A blog by Richard Edmondson

Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items

IPPNW peace and health blog

News and opinion from the international medical movement to abolish nuclear weapons and to prevent war

Political Film Blog

money, power, injustice, sex, violence, propaganda, anti-fascism...

Taking Sides

Thinking Through and Against Received Opinion

The Rabbit Hole

Denying the truth doesn't change the facts.

Uprootedpalestinians's Blog

Palestinians are at the heart of the conflict in the M.E Palestinians uprooted by force of arms.. Yet faced immense difficulties have survived, kept alive their history and culture, passed keys of family homes in occupied Palestine from one generation to the next.

Friends of Syria

revealing the truth

Dig Within

The blog of Kevin Ryan

Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

PEACE ACTION'S GROUNDSWELL

Peace Action, the largest grassroots peace organization in the U.S., was founded in 1957. Groundswell exists to inform, engage and mobilize. Formerly, the Peace Blog.

The Word - Ray Joseph Cormier

God, religion, history, politics, prophecy, current events

WiPoKuLi

Wissenschaft, Politik, Kunst und Literatur

Argentum Post

Human Rights, Social and Economic Justice, Participative Democracy, Peaceful Conflict Resolution, Going Where the Mainstream Media Does Not.

Wobbly Warrior's Blog

Just another WordPress.com site

OffGuardian

because facts really should be sacred

BCfm Politics Show

A Bristol Angle on World Politics

the burning blogger of bedlam

The cultural. The political. The weird. And Things That Go Bump in the Night...

The Most Revolutionary Act

Uncensored updates on world events, economics, the environment and medicine

Truth and Shadows

Following the white rabbit

Rise Up Times

Media for Justice and Peace

Three Worlds One Vision

Guyana - Brazil - USA

Finland Politics

A different view of Finland

WEB OF DEBT BLOG

ARTICLES IN THE NEWS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COMMENTS, FEEDBACK, IDEAS

Global Justice in the 21st Century

commentary on global issues

Jan Oberg

Life • Peace & PhotoGraphics

JoAnn Chateau

Writer & Progressive

The Contrary Perspective

Provocative views on politics, society, and the state of humanity

Voices from the Margins

A welcoming space for resistance to the forces of oppression and hegemony.

In Gaza

and beyond

Alfred de Zayas' Human Rights Corner

This is a human rights blog in which I address issues of general concern freely and spontaneously. It is not an official blog nor is it issued in my function as United Nations Independent Expert on the Promotion of a Democratic and Equitable International Order. It is a private blog intended to further an informal exchange of views in the democratic spirit of freedom of opinion and respect for the opinions of others.

The WordPress.com Blog

Spiritual Evolution 2017

Dandelion Salad

Anti-Capitalism, Anti-Imperialism, Anti-War, Socialism, Civil Liberties, Politics and Videos

Sri Aurobindo Studies

Sri Aurobindo's Integral Yoga

%d bloggers like this: