Stand For The Truth: Healing The World Of 9/11.

n August of 2016, a former employee of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) began looking into the reports his agency had released years earlier on the collapse of the World Trade Center. What he found shook him to the core.

In this poignant half-hour interview, Peter Michael Ketcham tells his story of discovering that the organization where he had worked for 14 years had deliberately suppressed the truth about the most pivotal event of the 21st century.

Through his willingness to look openly at what he failed to see in front of him for 15 years, Mr. Ketcham inspires us to believe that we can all muster the courage to confront the truth — and, in so doing, finally heal the wounds of 9/11.

(Thank you to ae911truth at YouTube)


10 thoughts on “Stand For The Truth: Healing The World Of 9/11.

  1. Wow. I hope we get to the bottom of 9/11. Peter Michael Ketcham mentions 3 reasons why the official investigation is allowed to stand. I would add another: People don’t WANT to know. The alternative scenario is incomprehensible to our patriotic values and sense of love/goodness, in general.


    1. JoAnn,
      Once the investigation begins, hundreds of men and women take the stand and testify and the God-awful truth comes out… after that future generations will talk about 9/11 for thousands of years. Mr. Ketcham is absolutely accurate in using the festering wounds metaphor because an unsolved 9/11 is just that, but on an immeasurable world scale. All the death, destruction, physical, emotional and spiritual harm since September 11, 2001 came about as a result of possibly the greatest lie in human history.

      Liked by 1 person

        1. In a sane and just world, the plans would have gone into effect long ago… If the powerful film and testimony of Mr. Ketcham doesn’t become the spark, then raging inferno, that cracks the wall of coverup – combined with impeccable exposures, books, films, conferences, etc. previously made public – then only God knows what would.

          Liked by 1 person

  2. Excellent Jerry, thank you. This is an especially valuable perspective. No matter how the story is spun, the documented facts contradict the ‘official narrative.’ So it will become increasingly difficult for the apologists to fulfill their complicit obligation to continue to ‘edit reality,’ because over time the old guard will have less & less control over how the cumulative data is processed.

    One can only speculate what certain Saudis and Israelis really know about this event, not to mention the various insiders at home. Somewhere deep in some secret files there will be powerfully incriminating evidence, maybe even in some private diary, that one day will surface. By then the perpetrators will have endured a lifetime of guilt-ridden shame.

    You put it very succinctly ~ “possibly the greatest lie in human history.”


    1. David,
      Yes.. especially valuable because Mr. Ketcham does not project the image many hold of a “tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorist”, but as an educated and rational human being who worked at NIST for some fourteen years. One must also appreciate the film’s producers and editors for consistently positioning the “official” narrative’s spokespersons in sharp contrast to Mr. Ketcham’s persistent refutations of their false claims, in effect squeezing out through the vehicle of film every drop of argument between falsity and truth. The editing is simply masterful. Perhaps one is over-optimistic, but this effort will very likely end up being the one which finally breaks the dam of lies, in Mr. Ketcham’s words “the unraveling.. accelerating”, and destroys the coverup. The world is fortunate here in 2017 for having such good people as these.
      Thank you.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Mr. Ketcham was not involved in the NIST WTC7 investigation. The information he is getting about it is coming largely from AE911 truth who have an agenda that is not about finding out why WTC7 collapsed but trying to dismiss any explanation for it’s collapse, unless it involves explosives.That is basically saying there was no reason for the building to collapse. If you are trying to work out why a building collapsed then the first requirement is that you are trying to work it out.
    I went to a Richard Gage presentation and it was all about explosives, from start to finish. The whole presentation started by talking about 9/11 and the resulting wars, the death toll and the Patriot act etc. The message was basically , aren’t these things terrible? Want to do something about it?, to undermine the reasons that all of these things happened? Well you can if you believe the collapse of WTC7 was caused by controlled demolition. That’s not scientific objectivity. That’s having an objective. There is a difference between having an objective and being objective.


    1. Colin, Perhaps AE911Truth’s agenda is simply getting to the truth, and not the contorted analysis you’ve described here. The organization has worked closely with distinguished university professors for goodness sake, and produced numerous lengthy presentations based on fundamental, routinized scientific principles. If your experience includes watching Building 7 drop into its own footprint and then accepting the NIST report as accurate, then one finds it impossible to perceive any path toward realistic discussion. There are billions of people around the world who weren’t involved in the NIST investigation, including Mr. Ketcham – although his credentials (for which you seem unwilling to credit) include 14 years being employed at NIST, yet any person whose eyes function properly can only conclude Building 7 came down due to controlled demolition.


Comments are closed.