9/11 Justice: ‘Biggest Legal Hill Ever.’

By Jerry Alatalo

Mount Rainier - 1Alphabet Renowned legal expert/attorney, professor and author Daniel Sheehan was one of the keynote speakers in New York City over the weekend (September 10-11) at the Justice In Focus 9/11 symposium. Mr. Sheehan shared details of major historic American cases he’d participated in and/or led, to provide relevant examples of difficulties and challenges the men and women pushing any effort to prosecute the potential criminals responsible for 9/11 will run up against.

From facing aggressive criticism by corporate media, to politically appointed judges who will block efforts for 9/11 justice, to probable near-endless resources available to individuals named as defendants, men and women lawyers on any team working for justice after 15 years will need their legal plans, tactics, and details in proper order – their legal “ducks in a row”.

A legal effort to prosecute individuals responsible for the crimes of 9/11 represents a higher level of seriousness than normal petty political crimes, and another category of scandal or crime involving national politics/government. The extremely rare events of 9/11 are criminal offenses for which existing legal institutions were never designed to handle.

To help illustrate the extraordinary legal nature and seriousness of the crimes committed on 9/11, Mr. Sheehan shares the words of President Jimmy Carter administration official Gary Sick, where Sick, referring to the Iran-Contra scandal, quotes a French poet: “..(crimes) so grave that they cause the very foundation of the law itself to tremble.”

Mr. Sheehan shared more words written by Gary Sick: “We know what to do with someone caught appropriating funds, but when confronted with evidence of a systematic attempt to undermine the very democratic political system itself, we all recoil in a general failure of nerve.”

In what was a very informative, revealing and forceful talk, Daniel Sheehan ended by telling men and women seriously considering lawsuits against the planners of 9/11 that, once begun: “..they better not stop, better not delay, but must be ready to go all the way with this.”

He also pointed out any 9/11 case would end up in front of the U.S. Supreme Court, making clear potential legal actions involve extremely high-level litigation, a heightened level of scrutiny, more attempts by judges to dismiss, and the necessity to “cross every ‘T’ and dot every ‘I’ .”

More people are becoming aware of the individuals and/or groups behind the 9/11 attacks as the U.S. “Deep State”. Of the remaining candidates in the 2016 presidential election, only Dr. Jill Stein and Ajamu Baraka of the Green Party have called for a new, independent investigation of 9/11.


Gary Null of the Progressive Radio Network posted a 15-year commemorative, 6-hour compilation of 9/11 interviews, including a talk with Daniel Sheehan. Other experts on various aspects of 9/11 interviewed by Mr. Null include:

  • Barbara Honeger, Former White House Policy analyst, founding member of Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth
  • Richard Gage, Founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
  • James Fetzer, Professor emeritus of the Philosophy of Science University of Minnesota, founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth
  • Graeme MacQueen, Retired professor of Comparative Religion at McMaster University in Ontario, co-editor of the peer-reviewed Journal of 9/11 Studies
  • Scott Bennett, Federal whistle-blower, author of “Shell Game”, former U.S. Army Special Operations officer specializing in terrorist financing
  • David Chandler, Retired physics teacher and board member of Scientists for 9/11 Truth
  • Lee Jamieson, Organizer of 9/11 Truth symposiums and founder of HR14.org

Consider Gary Null’s compilation of interviews a 6-hour audio book on the events of September 11, 2001. Thank you, Gary Null.


5 thoughts on “9/11 Justice: ‘Biggest Legal Hill Ever.’

  1. The very fact that the powers that be will do all they can to prevent a free and impartial inquiry into the events of 9/11 proves their culpability. It proves they know the truth and if that truth comes out it will destroy them. Can the sheeple see this?


    1. Sha’Tara,
      While Bush, Cheney, Blair, Saudi monarchs, etc. walk freely and create only God knows what level of continuing destruction, the massive false flag 9/11 remains unsolved. Credit goes to Stein-Baraka for taking the moral and courageous stand of calling for a new (real) investigation – embarrassing and pressuring Clinton / Kaine, Trump / Pence, Johnson / Weld to respond in the process. Was it that pressure on this exact topic – 9/11 – from Stein-Baraka that upset Ms. Clinton to the point of fainting? The Clinton campaign has more concern about Dr. Jill Stein than reported, and Ms. Stein’s published 9/11 letter was a devastating blow to Ms. Clinton, Mr. Trump and Mr.(What is Aleppo?) Johnson. Thank you.


  2. Popular theories about what destroyed the World Trade Center towers on September 11, 2001 are:

    1 Fires from jet fuel and office materials weakened steel in the upper floors and the buildings collapsed

    2 Conventional controlled demolition blew out supports at the base and the buildings collapsed

    3 Thermite cut steel columns on virtually every floor and the buildings collapsed

    4 Conventional explosives blew the buildings up

    5 Mini-nukes blew the buildings up

    Theories 1, 2 and 3 rely on gravity to bring the buildings down while the last two blow them up. Popular theories, yes, and dead wrong.
    Five facts scientifically documented in Ph.D. engineer Judy Wood’s comprehensive textbook (Where Did The Towers Go?) prove the popular theories false beyond any doubt whatsoever. Yes, I know it’s amazing. Who’d a thunk it’d be this easy?


    1. DEBRIS: What debris? There was so little debris from each 110-story building that there was no “pile” or “stack.” Rubble totaled less than a story. It was a football field as a survivor who emerged from Stairwell B, North Tower, exclaimed. No computers, toilets, and only one small piece from one Steelcase file cabinet were found. Some steel and mostly dust remained. Lack of debris on the ground from quarter-mile-high twin towers whispers “no collapse.” See Chapter 9.

    2. BATHTUB: A bathtub or slurry wall surrounded 70 feet of WTC subbasements to prevent the Hudson River from flooding the WTC and downtown. If each 500,000-ton tower had slammed into the bathtub in 10 seconds or less, the protective wall would collapse. Did not happen. Upshot? Collapses did not happen. See Chapter 5.

    3. SEISMIC IMPACT: “Had the towers collapsed, foundation bedrock would have experienced tremendous force hammering on it throughout the ‘collapse,’” writes Dr. Wood. Seismic instruments registered disturbances far too short in duration and far too small to record tower collapses. This was true of both the twin towers and 47-story WTC7. Again, no evidence of collapses. See Chapter 6.

    4. SOUND: There were no loud explosions, as established by videos, witnesses, and the official report of NIST. Nor were there loud screeches and screams from massive metal falling, colliding, scraping and collapsing on metal. See Chapter 6.

    5. DUST: Photos, videos and witness testimony show the towers turned to powder in mid-air. Tim McGinn, NYPD, said, “I was standing there for a couple of seconds thinking where the f**k is the tower? I simply couldn’t comprehend it.” The dust rollout was so enormous and thick it blocked out sunlight and left an inch or more of dust covering downtown. Much of it wafted into the upper atmosphere. The volume was incredible. Particles from dust samples were smaller than red blood cells and about the size of DNA. As for toxicity, researchers said the dust “recorded the highest levels we have ever seen in over 7,000 measurements we have made of very fine air pollution throughout the world, including Kuwait and China.” See Chapters 8, 9, 14-16.


    1. A “bold” reply that explains, or refutes absolutely nothing. Traces of military grade explosives were found in the rubble. The buildings are shown on many videos as collapsing straight down in what can only be attributed to a carefully orchestrated demolition. If your claim is the buildings simply disintegrated and turned to dust… how is that explained? Not heat from jet fuel since it cannot reach tempertures high enough to even melt the supporting steel girders in the structures… so? Alien ray guns perhaps? Or perhaps the divine weapon that turned Sodom and Gomorrah to ash? Even a cursory look at the many videos taken of the buildings show a controlled implosion. If only the jet’s impact and subsequent fires were responsible, the buildings would have suffered structural damage to the tope floors where they were hit and the rest would have remained standing and likely the descending fires (fire doesn’t do so well downward) would have been contained by firefighters and installed sprinkler equipment. Nothing was left to chance: those buildings had to be demolished and as much evidence as possible destroyed before reality and common sense reasserted itself and someone said, “Hey, wait a minute, that can’t be right.” I’m always amazed at people who insist despite all evidence to the contrary that criminals, if they are “too big to fail” must be defended. Perhaps the criminals involved in the deaths of thousands which then gave the green light for the deaths of hundreds of thousands and the destruction of the Middle East, will never be brought to justice, but in my mind, and the minds of millions, they have already been tried and convicted. The towers were deliberately imploded and the real guiltyones to this day live on American soil and may even be feeling a tiny bit of trepidation at the possibility that they failed to buy every single expert in the field, or destroy all relevant evidence.


Comments are closed.