Why A New Investigation Of 9/11 Is Vital For Humanity.

by Jerry Alatalo

“Change lays not her hand upon truth.”

– CHARLES SWINBURNE (1837-1909) English poet

Mount Rainier - 1Alphabet This is the last time the events of September 11, 2001 will become discussed here – until a new investigation becomes announced. Why is a new investigation to discover the truth about 9/11 vital for humanity? There are a number of reasons, including the fact that what young people are reading in their history books today is false.

Those young people are the future leaders of the world, and in order for them to lead and make good decisions – potentially affecting millions of others if elected to national office – they must base those decisions on truth.  The truth of what really happened on September 11, 2001 is essential if those young people are to make decisions in the future which are in the best interests – which are best for the health and well-being of their fellow citizens – of people living in America and around the Earth.

A new investigation of 9/11 is vital for future generations, and it is vital for humanity now. The people who carried out 9/11 are, because a serious criminal investigation with the power to match the events on that day was never undertaken, walking the Earth freely and only they know what criminal actions they’ve undertaken in the fourteen years since they committed mass murder.

A new investigation is vital for future generations and to get mass murderers “off the street” and behind bars. Failure to carry out basic law and order as relates to the criminals who carried out 9/11 could well be the greatest failure of criminal justice in history, and for so many overwhelmingly powerful reasons must not persist. The criminals who did 9/11 simply must be found, tried in a courtroom and punished when found guilty.


Building 7, never mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report, fell into its “own footprint at free-fall speed” in what Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth has described as, for years to anyone willing to listen, “…overwhelming, irrefutable evidence of controlled demolition”. Any rational man, woman or child who’s seen video of Building 7’s collapse knows immediately that fire could not have been the cause for its collapse. The fact that Building 7 came down in a controlled demolition is plain as day.

The number of witnesses who heard explosions that day is well over a hundred, and some heard explosions and saw damage in the lobby of Floor One before the first plane struck. None of the witnesses to explosions testified before the 9/11 Commission.

The government body assigned to investigate the collapse of World Trade Center I and II went only as far as “initiation of collapse” but no further. The final report did not include scientific analysis of the many physical events which occurred after that initiation. The two buildings’ absolutely massive amount of steel, concrete, infrastructure, office equipment and furniture, etc., etc. in Richard Gage’s words were “pulverized into fine powder” – gone and unrecognizable.

There is now enough indisputable evidence discovered through fourteen years of research and discovery by good men and women around the Earth to produce “reasonable doubt” on the findings of the investigation performed under the 9/11 Commission, and strongly suggesting  and justifying in the clearest and most direct manner a re-examination to correct errors of omission or commission.

It can no longer be denied. Humanity can no longer ignore addressing this paramount importance issue manifesting negative consequences in the world today.

The singular events of September 11, 2001 have become the most-researched and written about in the history of the world. It has become clear: an acceptable, inclusive and unprejudiced investigation has yet to become undertaken. For the sake of humanity now, and for future generations that investigation is absolutely vital.

(Thanks to Press TV News Videos at YouTube)

10 thoughts on “Why A New Investigation Of 9/11 Is Vital For Humanity.

  1. There has already been a new investigation into the events of 9/11! Wake up sheeple. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. Big Brother only has as much power as you grant him. Independent thought is powerful. After reading WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood, Charlie Pound of the U. K. produced the song WAKE UP THIS YOUR ALARM! Unless you enjoy being fleeced, leave the opinion herd and read Dr. Wood’s book too. It has been over 14 years since a secret technology was used to create terror and mass murder for the sake of imperialism and hegemony based on a fiat money system in its death throes. What are we as a people left with? A published scientific forensic investigation that concludes a type of Directed Energy that was used as a weapon “dustified” the World Trade Center complex and a group of shadowy people determined to suppress that evidence by any means. This is the sad reality that we live in. Wake up!

    © 2012 Music, Lyrics, & Vocals by Charlie Pound

    Before you can charge someone with a crime, you have to know what crime was committed. Should a death be ruled a homicide by gunshot, there better be a bullet hole in the body…

    The order of crime solving, that one must first identify:

    1) WHAT happened before determining
    2) HOW “it” happened…before one can determine
    3) WHO did “it” or
    4) WHY they did “it.”

    Since writing her book, Dr. Wood has come to understand more clearly how cover-ups work. People are encouraged to skip step #1 and begin arguing about step #2. In order to argue about HOW “it” happened, people are left to IMAGINE what “it” was that happened. From then on, they are only addressing an imaginary problem, not a real problem. And they can never ever solve the real problem unless they begin with step #1, which defines WHAT the problem is they need to solve. So skipping to step #3 is a useless path that leads you nowhere. See how easy a cover-up works! 😉


    Other examples of Directed Energy (not necessarily used as a weapon) are radio waves, cell phone signals, TV remote control signals, wireless internet signals…etc.

    Those who want to cover up the evidence of what happen often falsely claim that Dr. Wood is talking about a specific weapon and a specific location of it (e.g. laser beam from outer space, or “spacebeams”). This disinformation campaign was initiated by Steven Jones on 11/11/2006 in a presentation he gave in California (available in the internet archives), telling his audience that “Judy Woods (Dr. Wood) says it’s a laser or maser from space” while showing how difficult it is to hold his hand like a beam from space. Not only does Dr. Wood NOT SAY THAT, she actually RULES THAT OUT. The mechanism of destruction of a laser beam would be from heat and produce a bright and blinding light. But we know the buildings were not cooked to death. The term Directed Energy is used because energy is directed to do something different then it normally does and it is directed to do this within a certain geographic zone. [As a mental example, think of directing the binding energy of matter to repel instead of attract. A solid object would turn to atomic-sized dust. Direct this to happen within the WTC complex and not across the street.]

    At the end of Chapter 20 in Dr. Wood’s book, she explains why playing “name the weapon” game is counterproductive. Name dropping trendy terms is not synonymous with understanding. The easiest example is HAARP. The full capabilities are classified. But people often name-drop the trendy term to APPEAR to know something. A tongue-in-cheek definition of HAARP stands for High Amplitude Advancement of Real Propaganda. They are just substituting “HAARP” for “Bin Laden.”

    In Dr. Wood’s book, the closest she comes to “naming a weapon” is merely describing what it creates: magnetic-electrogravitic-nuclear reactions (page 365). But as soon as someone starts talking about a name, people will stop looking at the evidence which is another form of a cover up.

    Early on, Steven Jones created a website he called “The Journal of Nine Eleven Studies” or J.O.N.E.S. It is referred to as a “peer-reviewed journal” but the only peer-reviewing was to screen out true scientific work and post what he wanted his followers to believe. For the first two years, it was primarily used to promote disinformation about Dr. Wood’s work. For example, Jones recruited a patent attorney for the oil and gas industry (James Gourley) to write hit pieces on Dr. Wood, refuting “ray beams from outer space.” This convinced his readers that “Judy Woods” must be talking about “ray beams from outer space” and that “such nonsense has been refuted.” Refuting false propaganda about Dr. Wood’s work does not refute Dr. Wood’s work — yet it creates the belief in the average person that Dr. Wood’s work has been refuted.

    Steven Jones and Greg Jenkins also claimed that it would take more than five times the world’s energy to destroy the WTC towers. Does that mean their thermite came from off planet or “outer space”? LOL Steven Jones used to ridicule Dr. Wood during his talks saying that “Judy Woods needs to make calculations to see if it is even possible to turn the buildings to dust”. But any reputable scientist knows that calculations are not a part of observing empirical evidence. What are the calculations for, to prove the buildings are still there or if the buildings are gone? Why not just look? No assumptions needed with empirical evidence.

    The bottom line is that no one has refuted anything in Dr. Wood’s book nor can they. They only refute their own false propaganda about her book, not her book. Other detractors claim that “she hasn’t identified the weapon that was used so she’s got nothing.” To the contrary. The evidence is PROOF that there exists a technology that can do what was done. It happened. That is, the fact that the buildings mostly turned to dust in mid-air shows that there exists a weapon that can turn buildings into dust in mid-air. It happened.

    The sub-title of the book, “Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11” indicates that the book contains evidence of what happened on 9/11 and it is indeed evidence that a technology exists that can do what was done. But this technology does not have to be used for evil purposes. It can be used to provide free-energy to the world much to the demise of the oil and gas industry. That is, Dr. Wood is noting that the same technology that was used for evil can also be used for good. It’s a silver lining in the dark cloud… while also trying to stimulate thought about “what are we doing here? learning new ways to kill or to live”?

    “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” -Dr. Carl Sagan (1934-1996)

    (Dr. Wood provides extraordinary, overwhelming, and conclusive evidence.)

    by Dr. William L. Baker*

    “The effects can vary in the type of damage mechanism (e.g., blast/fragment, thermal, or ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSE [c-DEW: been there, done that]) as well as the magnitude of the energy deposited on the target so that it will be just enough to defeat the target while minimizing collateral damage.”

    “Scientists will have to overcome technological hurdles, such as the production and storage of antimatter, the ability to propagate sensory information, OR THE ABILITY TO HARNESS AND EXTRACT ENERGY FROM THE ENVIRONMENT [Hurricane Erin 2001: been there, done that], before these sciencefiction concepts will become reality.”


    *Dr. William L. Baker retired on 1/2/10 as the Chief Scientist of the Directed Energy Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M. With an annual budget of more than $300 million, the directorate is responsible for all of the Air Force research and development of lasers, high-power microwave and advanced optical technologies. The directorate conducts advanced technology research to support major applications such as airborne lasers, large optical systems for space situational awareness, airborne high-power microwaves, long-range non-lethal weapons and improvised explosive device defeat. The Chief Scientist is the directorate’s primary adviser on scientific and technical matters and the primary authority for the technical content and quality of the science and technology portfolio.

    Dr. Baker was born in Columbus, Ohio. He received his doctorate in nuclear physics from The Ohio State University in 1969 and served four years on active duty in the Air Force as a nuclear research officer. In 1973 he became a civilian scientist at the Air Force Weapons Laboratory where he performed and led high-energy plasma and pulse power research to develop new techniques to simulate nuclear weapon effects. His work in directed energy weapon technology began with high-energy particle beam weapons. Dr. Baker led a joint effort to develop a unique accelerator and used it to demonstrate stable beam propagation in open air. He then created and led the Air Force high-power microwave weapon technology program. As Chief Scientist, he led research and development on high-energy laser weapons technology and the application of advanced optics to space situational awareness. He is a nationally recognized contributor and leader across the entire spectrum of directed energy technologies. He has been president of the Directed Energy Professional Society for the past two years.

    Dr. Baker has written more than 50 publications in nuclear physics, plasma physics, pulsed power and directed energy.



    1. Stuart,
      How are you. It’s astonishing in the extreme to see otherwise smart people, knowing that deceptions exist in massive dimension, yet fail to expose them. An unacceptable situation any way one looks at it, and it’s past time for resolving – taking moral and right action. Thanks.


  2. Anyone who has read Dr. Wood’s book knows what happened. It’s not a theory. It’s forensic scientific evidence. I have read Dr. Wood’s book. So now, what do people like me do with this knowledge? It has exposed to me the mountain of prepackaged lies, distortions, and half truths the corporate controlled governments of the world produced for control of international economic markets. During the 2008 housing market crisis the Obama Administration assisted the banks because “They were too big to fail.” That is an incorrect use of words. They correct words are: THEY ARE TOO POWERFUL TO FAIL! Something is wrong when I can make 5% on my Discover points but lucky if I get 1% in savings.



    1. Banking family dynasties who’ve built their unimaginable fortunes through many decades have incredible power, far out of balance with what a handful of people should morally possess. There was intense heat in those towers; so hot that people jumped to their certain deaths.


Comments are closed.